2024-95 Notice of intent.pdf
PDF 336 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Peer Delivered Support Services
- Solicitation number
- S-C01010-00011743
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oakland City, Oregon
About this file
This is a Notice of Intent to Award Contract from Clackamas County, Oregon for RFP #2024-95 for Peer Delivered Support Services. The notice, dated December 3, 2024, announces Folk Time, Inc. as the apparent successful proposer. The notice initiates a seven calendar day protest period during which unsuccessful proposers may file protests in accordance with Rule C-047-0740. Unsuccessful proposers may review the procurement file at the Oregon City address by appointment.
The evaluation scores show Folk Time, Inc. consistently outperforming other bidders across six project components: Choice Program (90.86 points), Aid and Assist (92.29 points), Mobile Crisis Response Team (92.43 points), Mental Health Center (91.71 points), Intensive Care Coordination (91.00 points), and Older Adults (90.14 points). Scoring was based on five criteria: Proposer's General Information (20 points), Program Design/Strategy/Capacity (25 points), Staffing Plan/Training (25 points), Quality Assurance (15 points), and Budget Proposal (15 points). The other main competitors were MHAAO and NAMI, with True Care 24 only bidding on the Older Adults component where it scored significantly lower at 34 points.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PH: 503-742-5400 WWW.CLACKAMAS.US
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD CONTRACT
DATE: December 3, 2024
RFP #: 2024-95
TITLE: PEER DELIVERED SUPPORT SERVICES
APPARENT SUCCESSFUL PROPOSER: Folk Time, Inc.
In accordance with Local Contract Review Board Rule C-047-0740 and the above referenced RFP, Clackamas County (“County”) intends to award a contract to the above named apparent successful proposer. The above named apparent successful proposer shall not acquire any legal or equitable rights relative to the contract services until a contract containing terms and conditions acceptable to the County is executed. If the apparent successful proposer fails to negotiate and execute a contract with the County, the County may revoke the award and award the contract to the next highest ranked proposer or withdraw the RFP.
This Notice of Intent to Award Contract starts the seven (7) calendar day period in which an unsuccessful proposer may file a protest in accordance with Rule C-047-0740. Unsuccessful proposers may review the procurement file at the above Oregon City address upon appointment. Any protest must be in writing and must be delivered by email to the below address.
Thomas Candelario tcandelario@clackamas.us
Clackamas County appreciates the time and effort by proposers to submit for this solicitation and looks forward to receiving other proposals in the future. Please contact Thomas Candelario if you have any questions.
Ryan Rice Clackamas County Procurement mailto:tcandelario@clackamas.us
RFP # 2024-95
Evaluation Scores Averages
Project 1: Choice Program Firm Proposer’s
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100 Points)
Nami
15 15.14 16.29 11.29 8.49 66.14
Folk Time
19.14 22.43 21.71 13.43 14.14 90.86
MHAAO
18.29 22
22.57
12.43 13.57 88.86
Project 2: Aid and Assist Firm Proposer’s
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100
19.14 22.57 22.29 14.14 14.14 92.29
18.29 21.29
21.71
12.29 13.29 86.86
Project 3: Mobile Crisis Response Team
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100
19.14 23 22.29 14 14 92.43
18.29 20.29
22.14
12.29 13.57 86.57
Project 4: Mental Health Center (MHC) Firm Proposer’s
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100
19.14 22.71 22 13.86 14 91.71
18.29 21.71
22.43
12.29 13.29 88
Project 5: Intensive Care Coordination (ICC)
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100
19.14 22.14 21.86 13.86 14 91
18.29 22.14
22.43
12.29 13.43 88.57
Project 6: Older Adults
General Information (0-20 Points)
Program Design, Strategy and Capacity (0-25 Points)
Staffing Plan, Onboarding, Training and Development (0-25 Points)
Quality Assurance (0-15 Points)
Budget Proposal (0-15 Points)
Total (0-100
19.14 22 21.43 13.57 14 90.14
18.29 22.14
12.29 13.43 87.14
True Care 24 5 6.83 9 9.33 3.83 34
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .