2024_011 Procurement Summary.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- 2024-011 TYPE I AMBULANCE PURCHASES
- Solicitation number
- PE-77123-NONST-2024-000000016
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This document is a Procurement Summary for Request for Proposal (RFP) #2024-011 issued by Cherokee County for the purchase of up to 15 Type I Ambulances. The RFP was advertised for 69.95 days, and 102 vendors were contacted, with 2 submissions received. The source selection method was Highest Proposal Scoring, and the evaluation criteria consisted of technical compliance (45%), delivery schedule and capacity (15%), service and support (10%), and price (30%). Ten-8 Fire Equipment, Inc. of Bradenton, FL was evaluated as the highest scoring, responsive, and responsible firm and is recommended for award. The contract term is standard (15+ days).
The low bid price was $4,920,000, with a high bid of $5,120,604 and an average of $5,020,302. Ten-8 Fire Equipment, Inc. submitted the lowest bid at $4,920,000. No county businesses responded to the RFP. The source of funds is SPLOST, and there are no debarred/suspended vendors or SAM requirements.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROCUREMENT SUMMARY
RFP# 2024-011
Date Submitted: Procurement Process:
Submitted by: Length of Advertising:
Supplier Name: Source Selection Method:
Description: Fair Price Determination:
Agreement Type:
Contract Number:
Contract Category: Submissions Received: 2 Vendors Contacted: 102
Contract Term:
Contract Value: Weight
Contract Options/Renewals: 45%
Source of Funds: 15%
Debarred/Suspended: 10%
SAM Requirement: 30%
BOC Meeting Prepared for:
77.73
Evaluation Criteria
No County Businesses Responded
N/A - Lowest Evaluated Price Awarded
Highest Proposal Scoring
Adequate Price Competition
69.95
RFP/RFQ Selection Criteria Used in Selection Process
Evaluated Price
5,120,604.00$
Place of Business
Bradenton, FL.
*Important Price Evaluation Notes Cherokee County issued RFP # 2024-011 for the purchase of up to (15) Type I Ambulances. (102) Vendors were contacted of which (2) submissions were received. Each submittal was evaluated by members of the Cherokee County Fire Department. Evaluation criteria consisted technical compliance (45%), delivery schedule and capacity (15%), service and support (10%) and price (30%). Ten - 8 Fire Equipment, Inc. was evaluated as the highest scoring, responsive and responsible firm, and is therefore recommended for award.
Other Important Considerations
Safe Industries Easley, SC.
Brian Davis
April 2, 2024
Registration Not Required
No (screen-print on file)
SPLOST
None Technical Compliance
Delivery Schedule and Capacity
Service and Support
Price
Score
4,920,000.00$
Bidder/Proposing Business
4,920,000.00$
Specialty Items
Purchase Order
Ten - 8 Fire Equipment, Inc.
Other - See Notes
Purchase Order Not Low Bid Award:
County Business:
Request for Proposals (RFP)March 25, 2024
Type I Ambulance Purchases
Ten - 8 Fire Equipment, Inc.
Standard (15+) days
Percent of Category
Points Area of Evaluation Safe Industries
TEN-8 FIRE
EQUIPMENT,INC.
Possible Points:
100% 45.00 27.61 30.47
Possible Points:
100% 15.00 8.45 8.80
Possible Points:
100% 10.00 5.06 8.46
70% 70.00 Total Technical 41.12 47.73 30% 30.00 Price Score 28.82 30.00
100% 100 Price + Technical 69.95 77.73
2 1
Safe Industries
TEN-8 FIRE
EQUIPMENT,INC.
Technical Evaluation
Companies in order of scoring:
Company Name:
Delivery Schedule and Capacity
Technical Compliance
Service and Support
PROPORTIONAL DIFFERENCE TO LOW BID
Safe Industries
TEN-8 FIRE
EQUIPMENT,INC. 3 4
5,120,604.00$ 4,920,000.00$ -$ -$
Low Bid: 4,920,000$ Under Average
Percentage of Points Earned 96% 100%
Number of Points Earned 29 30
Low Bid High Bid Average Range # of Bids # Under Average
4,920,000$ 5,120,604$ 5,020,302$ 200,604$ 2 1
Points Available
When purchasing solutions or services where there are a number of possible ways to create acceptable results, there is an expectation that there will be a wide variety of acceptable prices as well. In this situation price scoring still needs to provide proportional outputs but on a less aggressive scale. Here the appropriate method utilizes the lowest acceptable bid as the basis for each other price to be compared and then multiplied by the points available.
Price Evaluation
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .