2023.07.14 Atch 4 PPQ.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pituffik Space Base Air Transportation Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC71123RC004
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation seeking air transportation services to Pituffik Space Base. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past and present contracts including contract numbers, types, values, periods of performance, and descriptions of services. It asks the customer to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional for quality, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management. The customer is also asked whether they would award another contract to the contractor and to provide a paragraph explaining their ratings and rationale. Completed questionnaires must be emailed to the contracting officer at the United States Transportation Command by August 14, 2023. The related federal contract opportunity is also for Pituffik Space Base Air Transportation Services being solicited by the Department of Defense United States Transportation Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HTC71123RC004 RFP Q and A 3.pdf | ||
| HTC71123RC004 RFP Q and A 1-2.pdf | ||
| 2023.07.14 Atch 1 Pituffik Airlift PWS.pdf | ||
| 1449 RFP HTC71123RC004.pdf | ||
| 2023.07.14 Atch 3 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2023.07.14 Atch 2 - Aircraft.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation HTC71123RC004 ATTACHMENT 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire When filled in, this document becomes
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
| Solicitation HTC71123RC004 |
| ATTACHMENT 5 – Past Performance Questionnaire |
When filled in, this document becomes
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
PITUFFIK SPACE BASE AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Completed Questionnaire shall be emailed directly to the United States Transportation Command Contracting Officer no later than 11:00AM CDT 14 August 2023 Email: jesika.a.dearmond.civ@mail.mil
SECTION 1 - CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (Company being evaluated)
A. Contractor Name:
B. Contract Number:
C. Contract Type (Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.):
D. Competitive Contract: Yes ________ No ________ E. Period of Performance:
F. Initial Cost of Contract:
G. Current/Final Cost of Contract:
H. Geographic Location of Services (local, regional, nationwide, worldwide):
I. Detailed description of services performed: ______________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2 - CUSTOMER INFORMATION (Organization providing the evaluation) A. Customer Name:
B. Evaluator's Name:
C. Evaluator's Phone Number:
D. Evaluator's Job Title:
| U |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the contractual partner's benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the contractual partner’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.[endnoteRef:1] [1: The Contractor: U M S VG E N |
16. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice (or commercial equivalent)? If yes, please explain the outcome: ______________________________________________________________________________
17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain:
PLEASE PROVIDE A PARAGRAPH SUPPORTING YOUR ABOVE RATINGS. EXPLAIN THE CONTRACTOR’S GREATEST STRENGTHS AND/OR WEAKNESSES AND YOUR RATIONALE FOR WHY YOU WOULD OR WOULD NOT AWARD A FUTURE CONTRACT TO THEM:
//Signed// Evaluator’s Signature Date
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!]
Controlled by:
Controlled by:
CUI Category/ies:
Limited Dissemination Control:
POC:
When Filled-in, this Document becomes
CUI
When Filled-in, this Document becomes
CUI
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .