20200722 CEM Mars6 Microwave Sole Source Justification.pdf

PDF 233 KB Posted

Attached to
MARC6 MICROWAVE
Solicitation number
1011217
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

(Including Brand Name Requests) ($3,000 - $25,000)

1. Description of supplies or services required (including estimated value).

Purchase of CEM Corporation Microwave Accelerated Reaction System, Model MARS 6 with iWave Temperature Control, for digestion of plant tissue samples. Unit will replace old MARS Express Microwave system which has become unreliable. New microwave system must be compatible with existing rotors and vessels and allow continued use of existing methods.

The deliverables that will result from the contract will include: MARS 6 with iWave Temperature Control, installation and training, and shipping.

2. Which of the Following Circumstances Permitting Other than Full and Open Competition Applies:

* 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and no Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements.

Purchasing newer model of existing unit will allow for use of our existing digest tubes and rotors, as well allowing continued use of existing methods and procedures ensuring consistent results for long-term studies and datasets.

3. A demonstration that the proposed contractor's unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited.

CEM is the leading producer of microwave assisted digestion technology, and the only manufacturer that allows continued use of our existing tubes and rotors, saving the agency thousands of dollars, ensuring consistent methods and results across long-term studies.

4. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable.

None, since the CEM Mars6 system is the only one that allows use of existing equipment and ensure the most identical replacement to our current instrumentation.

5. Is the Price Fair and Reasonable?

Price is as expected and comparable to previous unit

6. A description of market survey conducted and the results or a statement of reasons why market survey was not conducted.

No market survey was conducted as we require the same/similar technology and tube and rotor use as our existing system.

7. Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition.

To the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that this justification is accurate and complete.

Jeff Merriam 7/22/2020 Approving Official/Technical Person Date Contracting Officer Date

2020-07-29T17:07:25-0500
SUSAN DAVIS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .