2020 10 22 Atch 2 Survey Bremerhaven.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted Oct 26, 2021

Attached to: Stevedoring & Related Terminal Services, Bremerhaven, Germany Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: TRANSCOM22R002
Issued by: Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Stevedoring & Related Terminal Services, Bremerhaven, Germany, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
2021 10 26 RFI TRANSCOM22R002.pdf	PDF	Oct 26, 2021
Atch 4 DraftSOR -Bremerhaven 22R002.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 26, 2021
2021 10 14 Atch 3 PWS - BremerhavenSRTS - Copy.pdf	PDF	Oct 26, 2021
2021 09 14 Atch 1 RFI InfoSheetBermerhaven 22R002.docx	DOCX document	Oct 26, 2021

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment Two Attachment One

MARKET RESEARCH SURVEY

Stevedoring & Terminal Related Services (S&RTS) Port of Bremerhaven, Germany

TRANSCOM22R002

1. Is your company a registered agent able to provide S&RTS services at the Port of Bremerhaven, Germany?

Answer____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. What documented proof are you able to provide demonstrating your companies authorized ability to access and operate S&RTS services at the Port of Bremerhaven, Germany?

3. The Government intends to utilize US dollars (USD) to compensate the awardee for services rendered. Can your company conduct financial transactions that may result from this requirement in USD? If not, please explain anticipated complications.

4. Does your company have experience handling military vehicles, containers, and cargo to include HAZMAT and/or explosives? If yes, please provide examples of the type, size, and hazardous classifications.

5. The US Government is contemplating the use of one five-year base ordering period with one six-month extension, if needed. Please identify and explain any limitations, constraints or regulatory concerns which may prevent you from performing under these terms?

6. A draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) was included with this RFI. Please identify any terms and conditions you believe deviate from commercial best practices or would cost the US Government unnecessary time and money? Please be specific and provide recommendations as to how we can improve.

7. If an award was to materialize from this effort, would your company be able to start performance within 30 days of contract award? If not, how much transition time would you need to become operational ready to start?

8. Offerors are required to be registered in SAM when submitting a quotation or offer and shall continue to be registered until time of award, during performance and through final payment of any contract resulting from this solicitation. Is there anything impeding compliance with this requirement?

9. Please review the draft Schedule of Rates (SOR) attached. Do the units of measure annotated align with commercial industry best practices? How can it be revised to improve quality of service to the end user and provide cost savings to the Government? Please avoid vague comments and be as specific as possible.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Oct 26, 2021.