2018 Muddy Brook Bee Study Bid Evaluation Form Nelson.xls
XLS spreadsheet 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-18-1046-DFW-FW104-22998
- Issued by
- Worcester County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is a bid evaluation form for the 2018-2019 Muddy Brook Bee Study contract opportunity issued by the Massachusetts Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW). The evaluation criteria cover the completeness of the proposal, the contractor's experience, the adequacy of the project scope and methods, the understandability and completeness of the budget, and whether the total cost meets expectations. The reviewer, Michael W. Nelson, an Invertebrate Zoologist, scored the proposal 50 out of a possible 50 points.
The related state and local contract opportunity is for Canopy Bee Surveys at the Muddy Brook Wildlife Management Area (WMA) in Hardwick, Massachusetts, within Worcester County. The contract duration is not specified.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Pay Discount Form~15.doc | DOC document | |
| newMass_W9~47.doc | DOC document | |
| Comm TermsConditions~7.pdf | ||
| contractor authorized signature~24.doc | DOC document | |
| REVENUE ENFORCEMENT AND PROTECTION CERTIFICATION~54.docx | DOCX document | |
| req-specs_New version 2015.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2018 Muddy Brook Bee Study Bid Evaluation Form_jjs.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| 2018 Muddy Brook Bee Study Bid Evaluation Form - Buelow.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| standard-contract-frm~16.doc | DOC document | |
| COMPLIANCE_MA Security Law~49.docx | DOCX document | |
| EFT form~20.doc | DOC document | |
| DFW-2018-018_Request for Proposals Muddy Brook Bee Surveys.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Muddy Brook Bee Study
| Evaluation Form for Proposals Muddy Brook Bee Study 2018-2019 | |
| Joan Milam | |
| Evaluation Criteria : | Score |
| Is the proposal complete? Are all the required sections included? | |
| (Complete = 10 pts; Missing 1 section = 5 pts; Missing more than 1 section = 0 pts) | 10 |
| Is the proposed contractor adequately experienced? | |
| Extensive documented experience = 10 pts; Some documented experience = 5 pts; No demonstarted experience = 0 pts) | 10 |
| Are the project scope and methods adequate / will DFW meet our project goals? | |
| (Clear and appropriate = 10 pts; Vague or questionable = 5 pts; Incomplete = 0 pts) | 10 |
| Is the budget understandable and complete? | |
| (Complete, no questions remaining = 10 pts; Questions remain but low significance = 5 pts; | |
| Incomplete, substantial questions remain = 0 pts) | 10 |
| Does the total cost for the proposed products meet our expectations? | |
| (Meets or exceeds = 10 pts; Cost higher than expectations = 5 pts; Cost prohibitive = 0 pts) | 10 |
| Total Point Score | 50 |
| Reviewer: Michael W. Nelson | |
| Title: Invertebrate Zoologist | |
| Date: February 26, 2018 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .