Att__5_Past_Present_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 127 KB Posted

Attached to
World Trade Center Health Program Clinical Center of Excellence
Solicitation number
2016_N_18001
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
QandA_2016N18001_CCE_follow_up_12.09.16_x2.pdf PDF
QandA_2016N18001_CCE_follow_up_12.09.pdf PDF
pricing_worksheet_template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QandA_2016N18001_CCE_follow_up.pdf PDF
CCE_PWS_11_17_16_1.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_CCE_11.17.pdf PDF
CCE_PWS_11_01_16_1.pdf PDF
QandA_2016N18001_CCE.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_CCE_11.01.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_CCE_10.19.pdf PDF
Att__4_ACH_form.pdf PDF
Att__3_BAA.pdf PDF
Att__6_HHS_small-business-subcontracting-plan.doc DOC document
Att__2_IT_Security.pdf PDF
Att__1_CCE_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT #5

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Name of Offeror:

Reference Information Table Business Name of Reference & Address

Point of Contact

Phone number

E-mail address

Contract or Purchase Order Number

Dollar Value

Period of Performance

Description of Services Performed

Explain any problems and resolutions

By submitting a questionnaire to its business references, the offeror authorizes the government to discuss past performance with the business reference identified in the table above.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U S G VG E N

Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral

Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas;

deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.

Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Effective performance;

fully responsive to contract requirements;

reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements;

contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part;

only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.

Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.

No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available

1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones?

Comments:

P/U S G VG E N

2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?

3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service?

4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?

5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?

6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again?

Co mment s :

YES NO

Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:

EVALUATOR NAME

TITLE OF EVALUATOR

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of Offeror:
Reference Information Table
Business Name of Reference & Address
Point of Contact
Phone number
E-mail address
Contract or Purchase Order Number
Dollar Value
Period of Performance
Description of Services Performed
Explain any problems and resolutions
By submitting a questionnaire to its business references, the offeror authorizes the government to discuss past performance with the business reference identified in the table above.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Neutral
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
No record
of relevant
past performance or past
performance
information is not available
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?
Comments:
P/U S G VG E N
7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again?
Comments:
YES NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
______________________________________
EVALUATOR NAME
______________________________________
TITLE OF EVALUATOR
Word Bookmarks
Reference_Questionnaire
Text16
Text17
Text18
Text19
Text20
Text11
Text12
Text13
Text14
Text15
Text2
Check10
Text3
Text4
Text6
Text21
Text5
Text7
Text8
Text9

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .