PAST_PERFORMANCE_Questionnaire.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP 2014 N 15769

This evaluation should be completed by the Government or non-Government Contracting Officer (CO), Contracting Officer’s Representative or other person responsible for monitoring the contractor’s compliance with the requirements of the contract.

In compliance with the direction in the FAR, the information contained in this evaluation is source selection sensitive and may not be used for other purposes.

Any questions you might have concerning completion of this form should be addressed to the CDC Contracting Officer at ins4@cdc.gov.

Contractor Name

Contract Number

Contract Title

Contract Award Date

Contract Completion Date (including options)

Contract Value (including options)

Evaluator

Position/Title

Phone Number

E-mail address

Date

Brief Description of Contract.

Definitions and Rating Guidelines The following ratings summarize contractor performance in technical performance, cost control, timeliness, and management/business relations. Each criterion should be assigned a rating of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. If a particular criterion is not applicable, it should be rated as N/A. The evaluator may provide comments to clarify a rating.

The following guidance is provided in evaluating the contract.

Exceptional- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Very Good- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

and quality of Contractor personnel?

mitigate technical and programmatic risks?

technical requirements and performance standards?

changes in technical direction?

the Contractor’s reports and documentation?

COST CONTROL

efficient practices?

completeness of the Contractor’s cost reports and documentation?

customer cost/billing information requests?

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

tasks or key project milestones on schedule?

completeness of the Contractor’s technical and management reports and documentation submissions?

MANAGEMENT/BUSINESS RELATIONS

support assigned?

coordinate, integrate & manage subcontractors?

retain qualified personnel?

cooperation, and commitment to customer satisfaction?

cost/pricing proposals in relation to ultimate costs?

performance problems?

SUMMARY OF OVERALL PERFORMANCE

performance on this contract?

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain ratings that were either Marginal or Unsatisfactory, or for additional information not included above)

RFP 2014 N 15769 Page 2