Insoft;__JEFO_Below_SAT.pdf

OPOAM 3016.505-90(a)(2)(i) Justification for Exception to Fair Opportunity

Exceeding the micro-purchase threshold and up to the SAT pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(A)

JEFO No.: 20103469

Date: May 4, 2010 PR Number 20103469

1. Nature and/or description of the item/service being procured and anticipated cost:

[Example: The Department of Homeland Security, Office of Procurement Operations, (OPO Division), prepared this justification for an exception to fair opportunity.]

2. Statutory Exception and rationale for its use: (Select one and explain rationale below):

_________FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A). The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.

X FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B). Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized. See Rationale below.

_________FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C). The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order. [For logical follow-on, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value)]:

_________FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D). It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

_________FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(E). For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.

Rationale: Upgrades to Huntmaster Software which is proprietary to Insoft, LLC, North Miami, FL

Contracting Officer Date