2. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx
DOCX document 88 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12444524Q0022
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan outlines performance monitoring for a non-native invasive species treatment contract on the Hoosier National Forest. The contractor will apply herbicides to infested areas according to the statement of work, treating at least 90% of target species with a minimum 90% kill rate. Work will be evaluated visually and with GPS to confirm boundaries and kill percentages. The contractor is responsible for quality control and completing work by the deadline. The contracting officer representative will monitor performance using daily diaries and make recommendations to the contracting officer if deficiencies occur. Acceptable quality levels define allowable deviations, and non-performance will be addressed through documentation and potential remedial actions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix A Daily Diary.pdf | ||
| 3. Maps.pdf | ||
| 5. Experience Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4. Orange County SCA WD 2015-4821.txt | TXT text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Contents
| Project Name | 3 | |
| Section 1: Introduction | 3 | |
| 1.1 | Purpose | 3 |
| 1.2 | Relation to the Contract | 3 |
| 1.2.1 | Revisions | 3 |
| 1.2.2 | Surveillance of Performance Progression | 3 |
| 1.3 | Relation to the Quality Control Plan (QCP) | 3 |
| Section 2: Performance Description | 3 | |
| 2.1 | Performance Standards and Quality Levels (AQLs) | 3 |
| 2.1.1 Performance Requirement Summaries | 4 | |
| 2.1.2 | Allowable Deviation | 4 |
| 2.1.3 | Substantially Complete | 5 |
| 2.2 | Non-Performance | 5 |
| 2.2.1 | Documentation | 5 |
| 2.2.2 | Remedial Actions | 5 |
| Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities | 5 | |
| 3.1 Contractor Responsibility | 5 | |
| 3.2 | Government Responsibility | 5 |
| 3.2.1 | Contracting Officer (CO) | 5 |
| 3.2.2 | Contracting Officer Representative (COR) | 5 |
| Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance | 6 | |
| 4.1 Surveillance Methods | 6 |
Project Name Wesley Chapel Gulf NNIS 2024
Section 1: Introduction This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the statement of work (SOW) entitled Wesley Chapel Gulf Non-Native Invasive Species (NNIS) treatment. This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines that the USDA, Hoosier National Forest will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to measure performance and to identify the reports required and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the contractor is meeting the performance standards identified in the SOW. This QASP is designed to define roles and responsibilities, identify the performance objectives, define the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor’s performance, describe quality assurance reporting, and describe the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results.
1.2 Relation to the Contract
1.2.1 Revisions
The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) may make revisions or changes to the QASP procedures and surveillance methods or increase or decrease the degree of surveillance methods at any time during the contract performance period. Changes to the Metric must be incorporated into the SOW, Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) and QASP by a bilateral modification to contract that is issued by the Contracting Officer (CO). A copy of the QASP is provided to the contractor to enable the contractor to enhance its Quality Control (QC) program to perform in accordance with its Quality Control Plan (QCP).
1.2.2 Surveillance of Performance Progression
As the performance period progresses, the levels of surveillance may be altered for service areas where performance is either consistently excellent or unsatisfactory. If consistently good performance, then the amount of surveillance may be reduced. If observations reveal consistent deficiencies, increased surveillance may be implemented.
1.3 Relation to the Quality Control Plan (QCP)
The QCP is a required element of contract and the Contractor shall adhere to its established quality control processes and procedures in managing and performing work as described in the contract. While the QCP represents the way in which the Contractor will ensure its quality and timeliness of services, as defined in the SOW, the QASP represents the way in which the Government personnel specified in Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities, Paragraph 3.2, Government Responsibilities will evaluate the contractor’s performance. The contractor’s QC program and the residual organization’s QASP should be complementary programs that ensure successful contractor performance.
Section 2: Performance Description Performance of the contractor will be monitored through the surveillance methods described in Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance to assess the Contractor’s performance against SOW requirements.
2.1 Performance Standards and Quality Levels (AQLs)
For selected activities in the SOW, the PRS provides a performance standard and an AQL. A performance standard is the expected level of contractor performance. An AQL defines the level of performance that is satisfactory. Depending on the service evaluated and the evaluation method selected, performance standards and AQLs may be stated as a number of occurrences or as a percentage. Performance standards and AQLs for random sampling and 100 percent inspection are generally stated as percentages. For periodic inspections, performance standards may be stated as either percentages or as absolute numbers.
The contract requires the Contractor to perform all work as specified. Any inaccuracies or omissions in services or products are referred to as “defects” on the part of the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for all identified defects and may be required to perform the work at no cost to the government. The AQLs take into account that in some instances an allowable level of deficiencies (deviations) is possible while overall performance continues to meet the government’s desired level of service.
2.1.1 Performance Requirement Summaries
Contract Line Item No. – Work Requirement
| Task / Critical Sub-tasks |
| Inspection requirements |
| *Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
| (Line Items: 1-3) |
| Contractor will apply foliar herbicides in a systematic fashion to provide coverage to the infested area according to the specifications on the Statement of Work. |
| At least 90% of target NNIS infestation(s) treated. |
AQL determinations are made by the COR upon inspection of the work.
These determinations are unilateral and not protestable.
Minimum 90% kill of target NNIS infestation(s)
Visual and with use of GPS unit
Quality Assurance Plan
Contract Line Item No. – Work Requirement
| Task / Critical Sub-tasks |
| Inspection requirements |
| *Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Monitoring Method |
Schedule (non-Line Item)
| Timely Completion of the contract work |
| Per the Work Schedule, the Contractor will complete all work prior to the contract end date. |
AQL determinations are made by the COR upon inspection of the work.
These determinations are unilateral and not protestable.
| All work must be complete by the end date of the contract and meet the AQL. |
| Visual and with use of GPS unit |
*Meeting the AQL for Line Items: Contractor(s) must reapply the required herbicide, or mechanical work, at their expense upon failure to meet AQL values at the final inspection for each contract line item where the work performed failed to reach the minimum acceptable target kill ratio of the NNIS infestation(s).
2.1.2 Allowable Deviation
The AQLs define the level or number of performance deficiencies the Contractor is permitted to reach under this contract. AQLs take into account the difference between an occasional defect and a gross number of defects. AQLs can be expressed as a percentage of or as an absolute number (e.g., three per month). There may be instances where 100 percent compliance is required, and no deviation is acceptable (e.g., where safety is involved).
2.1.3 Substantially Complete
In some cases, service outputs are evaluated using subjective values (e.g., excellent, satisfactory, unsatisfactory). The criteria for acceptable performance and for defects must be defined for these service outputs. The concept of “substantially complete” should be the basis for inspections based on subjective scales. Work is considered “substantially complete” where there has been no significant departure from the terms of the contract and no omission of essential work. In addition, the Contractor has performed the work required to the best of its ability and the only variance consists of minor omissions or deficiencies.
2.2 Non-Performance
Non-performance occurs when the contractor’s performance does not meet the AQL for a given requirement. Requirements may contain multiple performance elements, and therefore, deficiencies may occur in one or more aspects of performance (e.g., timeliness, accuracy, completeness, etc.) or subject areas of effort.
When surveillance indicates that the contractor's service output is not in compliance with the contract requirements, the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) must determine whether the Contractor or the Government caused the deficiency. If the cause of the defect rests with the Government, corrective action must be taken through Government channels. If the cause of the defect is due to action or inaction by the contractor, the contractor is responsible for correction of the problem at no additional expense to the Government.
2.2.1 Documentation
Documentation of work non-performed or unacceptable work is essential for tracking Contractor performance. The COR will document deficient work by compiling facts describing the inspection methods and results and to substantiate nonconformance with the contract. Contract Daily Diary (Reference FSH 6309-32) will be used to document Contractor performance. The documentation, with any recommendations, will be forwarded to the CO. In the case of the Contractor, the COR will decide whether to elevate the problem to the CO for corrective action.
2.2.2 Remedial Actions
The Federal Acquisition Regulation allows for penalties in the event that the Contractor fails to perform the required services. Penalties are defined as those actions taken under the direction of the CO against the contractor within the general provisions of the contract for nonconformance to the SOW and PRS.
Section 3: Contractor and Government Responsibilities
3.1 Contractor Responsibility
The Contractor is responsible for delivering products or services in accordance with the contract. Implementing its QCP, which describes the Contractor’s methods for ensuring all products and services under the contract meet established performance standards and AQLs. Maintaining, and providing for audit, quality control records and reports and all records associated with the investigation and complaint resolutions. Appointing a single quality control point-of-contact to act as a central recipient of communication from the COR or CO.
3.2 Government Responsibility
3.2.1 Contracting Officer (CO)
The CO is responsible for administering and monitoring contract compliance, contract administration, and cost control and for resolving any differences between the observations documented by COR and the contractor’s performance. The CO may delegate various day-to-day contract administration duties to an Administering ACO (ACO) and/or the COR for performance management and administrative actions such as invoice approval and issuance of Contract Discrepancy Reports may be, and normally are, delegated by the CO to the COR. The CO shall approve any revisions to the QASP processes or standards.
3.2.2 Contracting Officer Representative (COR)
The COR, is designated in writing, by the CO. The COR will ensure that the Quality Assurance (QA) function is properly executed, plays a key role in contract administration, and performs the contract surveillance and monitoring. Some key contract administration duties include, but are not limited to, performs surveillance as required by this QASP; make recommendations to the CO for issuance of Contract Discrepancy Reports or letters of commendation and acceptance or rejection of completed work and for administrative actions based on unsatisfactory or non-performed work, and revisions or changes to the QASP; and assists the CO in identifying necessary contract modifications and preparing reports of Contractor performance and cost.
The COR may use the form(s) included in the Appendices to perform the inspection or other forms as approved by the CO.
Section 4: Surveillance Methods to Perform Quality Assurance
4.1 Surveillance Methods
The surveillance methods used in the QA process are the Government’s tools to monitor the Contractor’s products and services. The best means of determining whether the Contractor has met all contract requirements is to inspect the Contractor’s service products and analyze the results. Further, documented inspection results are an effective tool in contract administration that can confirm the successful achievement of all performance requirements or highlight areas where defects exist and improvements are necessary.
1. Work will be evaluated based on visual inspection, to confirm kill rates to both target NNIS species and non- target native plant species.
2. A GPS unit will be utilized to confirm work is performed inside project boundaries.
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .