2. LBP Report ZEM-25187 Bldgs 223-224.pdf
PDF 8 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912C325BA002
About this file
This document is a Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report for Buildings #223 and #224 located at USAG Fort Buchanan in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, prepared by Zimmetry Environmental Management Corp. in July 2025. The comprehensive inspection utilized X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzers to test approximately 423 surface samples across the buildings, identifying lead-based paint on multiple components including wall surfaces, columns, moldings, steps, stringers, window moldings, and bollards. The testing found lead-based paint present in selective concrete, metal, and exterior components, with lead concentrations at or above 1.0 mg/cm², which exceeds EPA and Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources regulatory thresholds.
The report provides detailed documentation of lead-based paint locations, including specific areas within each building, surface colors, substrates, and approximate material quantities. Photographic evidence and XRF sampling data are included in the appendices, with recommendations for proper lead abatement or removal. The inspection was conducted by two state-certified lead inspectors using calibrated XRF instruments, following HUD guidelines and local regulations. The report notes that before any demolition, contaminated surfaces must be abated or removed by a DRNA-certified abatement firm, and the report itself is valid for five years from the inspection date.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Project:
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Client:
Fort Buchanan
ZEM-25187
July 2025
Prepared By:
Zimmetry Environmental Management, Corp.
www.zimmetry.com info@zimmetry.com
Table Of Content
Section 1: Executive Summary
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Summary of Property Evaluation
1.3 Property Locations of Building Components with Lead-Based Paint
Table 1-1: Summary of Components Containing Lead
Section 2: Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
2.1 Overview of the Evaluation
2.2 Sampling Procedure
2.3 Results Presentation
2.3.1 Specific Findings
2.3.2 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations
2.3.3 Inaccessible Areas Presumed to be Lead-Based Painted
2.4 Lead Regulatory Levels
Table 2-1: Lead Regulatory Levels
2.5 Conditions and Limitations—Disclaimer
2.6 Abatement Conditions
2.7 Recommendations
2.8 Environmental Assessment Report Certification
Section 3: Appendices
List of Appendices Appendix A: Certifications, Licenses, and Accreditations Appendix B: XRF Sampling Data Appendix C: XRF’s Performance Characteristics Sheet Appendix D: Photographic Record Appendix E: Location of Positive Materials
Lead Based Paint Inspection Project No. ZEM-25187
Section 1: Executive Summary
1.1 Introduction
A Lead-Based Paint inspection was conducted on June 24, 2025, at Buildings #223 & #224 located at USAG Fort Buchanan, in the municipality of Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. The lead-based paint inspection was performed to identify paint that contains lead above allowable levels and to assist with compliance with local, state, and federal regulations.
1.2 Summary of Property Evaluation
The inspection consisted of the evaluation of the interior and exterior areas of the buildings mentioned above. The inspection determined that lead-based paint was present in selective components and surfaces throughout the project on the inspection date. Table 1-1 identifies the components positive for lead. Table 2-1 identifies lead-based paint as defined by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DRNA) of Puerto Rico. For specific locations and additional details on the lead location- reference Sections 2 and 3.
1.3 Property Locations of Building Components with Lead-Based Paint
Table 1-1 summarizes the site components and surfaces coated with lead-based paint. Additional details identifying positive lead-based paint findings within specific areas and on surfaces are provided in Section 2: Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report. The “substrate” is the building component material directly beneath the painted surface. Photographic documentation is for reference purposes and doesn't necessarily include all the surfaces with lead-based paint and/or components containing lead. The quantification of positive materials presented in this table is only an estimate. If an abatement of the materials will be conducted, the Contractors shall estimate the amount of materials to be abated.
If homogeneous materials not accounted for are identified in areas not described in this report or inaccessible areas described in Section 2.3.3, they shall be managed as containing lead. If suspected components that could contain lead are encountered underneath currently installed tiles or other construction material, they shall be managed as containing lead until the appropriate test is performed. Refer to Appendix E: Location of Positive Materials for specific locations.
Note:
1. The quantification of positive materials presented in this table is only an estimate. If an abatement of the materials will be conducted, the Contractors shall estimate the amount of materials to be abated.
2. Lead-based painted concrete lower wall surfaces are up to 3 feet.
Table 1-1: Summary of Components Containing Lead of Building #223
Area Component Color Substrate Approximate Amount
1-2, 1-5, 1-14 Wall Surface (A) White Concrete 360 Ft2
1-3 Wall Surfaces (A & D) White Concrete 248 Ft2
1-4 2Lower Wall Surfaces
(A) White Concrete 27 Ft2
1-11, 1-9 Wall Surface (C) White Concrete 136 Ft2
1-18 Wall Surfaces (A & C) White Concrete 528 Ft2
Exterior Side B
Lower Wall Surface Red
Concrete
40 Ft2
Steps Cream 18 Ln Ft
Stringer Red 10 Ln Ft
Exterior Side C
Upper & Lower Wall Surface Cream / Red
Concrete 1,264 Ft2 Column Orange
Window Molding Red
Exterior Side D
Upper & Lower Wall Surface Cream / White
Concrete 280 Ft2 Window Molding Red
Exterior Side A
Upper & Lower Wall Surface Cream / Red
Concrete 1,264 Ft2 Window Molding Red
Column Orange
Note:
1. The quantification of positive materials presented in this table is only an estimate. If an abatement of the materials will be conducted, the Contractors shall estimate the amount of materials to be abated.
2. Lead-based painted concrete lower wall surfaces are up to 3 feet.
Table 1-1: Summary of Components Containing Lead of Building #224
Area Component Color Substrate Approximate Amount
Exterior Side A Wall Surface Cream / Red Concrete
1,650 Ft2 Column Cream Concrete
Exterior Side C
Wall Surface Cream / Red Concrete 1,030 Ft2
Column Cream Concrete
Molding Red Concrete 20 Ln Ft
Bollards Yellow Metal 4 Units
1-8, 1-9, 1-13 Wall Surface (A) Cream / White Concrete 100 Ft2
1-12 2Lower Wall Surfaces
(A & C) White Concrete 540 Ft2
1-14, 1-15 & 1-16
2Lower Wall Surface (A) White Concrete 150 Ft2
Section 2: Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
2.1 Overview of the Evaluation
This lead-based paint inspection is an investigation to identify all lead-based paint on a surface-by-surface basis. A lead-based paint inspection conforming to HUD guidelines was performed at the buildings mentioned above.
An average of 423 samples were taken at identified surfaces of the evaluated areas using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. The evaluation found that lead-based paint was present in selective components and surfaces through the buildings on the assessment date (See Table 1-1).
Some of the remaining XRF test locations exhibited lead-in-paint levels below the level that EPA identifies as lead-based paint, namely 1.0 mg/cm2. Such surfaces could create dust-lead or soil-lead hazards if the paint is turned into dust by abrasion, scraping, or sanding. Should these or any lead-containing components or surfaces be disturbed in any manner that generates dust, care should be taken to limit its spread.
Testing was performed by Melanie Bermúdez, state-certified lead inspector LBPI-19224-232, and by Karla L. Sotomayor, state-certified lead inspector LBPI-34024-431, both using the Niton XLp- 300A XRF, SN-25492 and the SciAps X550Pb, SN-03578, respectively. The credentials are provided in Section 3, Appendix A: Certifications, Licenses, and Accreditations. The XRF analyzer is designed to measure the lead content of surface coatings on various building surfaces, substrates, and components. The measurement is rapid and nondestructive and, according to the manufacturer, can detect lead concentrations within numerous layers of various surface coatings.
Please refer to the XRF Testing Results Section 3, Appendix B: XRF Sampling Data for each inspected area's detailed analytical testing results. The reports provide complete testing data.
2.2 Sampling Procedure
The Lead-Based Paint Sampling Procedure was designed to evaluate and document all the data obtained from the inspection in a sequential method that provided confidence at the moment of the presentation of the results.
The survey followed the methodology established in the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint in Housing (2012 revision) and the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DRNA) of Puerto Rico Regulation 9098: Regulation for Proper Management of Lead-Based Paint Activities. The surface-by-surface evaluation was performed as follows:
• If the lead concentration measured by the XRF Spectrum Analyzer is less than 1.0 mg/cm2, it is considered negative.
• If the lead concentration measured by the XRF Spectrum Analyzer is equal to or greater than
1.0 mg/cm2, it is considered positive.
A name was assigned to each functional space of the buildings based on the use of that space. A code letter or number was assigned if no name could be assigned.
Each wall surface was named with letters beginning with wall A, the wall facing the main entrance direction. The wall on your left will be wall B, the wall in front wall C, and the wall on your right will be wall D.
2.3 Results Presentation
This section describes the buildings components and surfaces coated with lead-based paint (LBP) and/or containing lead, which were observed in the inspection. Please note that the recommendations given are the minimum required action, which should be taken based on our professional judgment.
According to the DRNA lead regulations, before demolishing a structure containing lead-based paint, the contaminated surfaces or substrates must be abated or removed. The abatement firm must be certified as an abatement firm by the DRNA.
2.3.1 Specific Findings
The following LBP was found to contain more or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 for what the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DRNA) of Puerto Rico identifies as lead-based paint or materials containing lead:
• Bollards • Stringer
• Column • Wall Surfaces
• Molding • Window Molding
• Steps
2.3.2 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations
NONE
2.3.3 Inaccessible Areas Presumed to be Lead-Based Painted
NONE
2.4 Lead Regulatory Levels
The lead regulatory levels provided below are those used when preparing this lead-based paint evaluation or when evaluating data collected. The EPA regulatory levels are the same as the state regulatory levels provided in the following table.
Table 2-1: Lead Regulatory Levels
EPA/DRNA Levels
Lead-Based Paint
1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight (or 5,000 ppm)
2.5 Conditions and Limitations—Disclaimer
Zimmetry Environmental Management Corp. has performed this lead-based paint inspection thoroughly and professionally, consistent with commonly accepted industry standards. The Preparer cannot guarantee and does not warrant that this evaluation has identified all adverse environmental factors and/or conditions affecting those buildings on the evaluation date.
The results reported, and conclusions reached by the Preparer are solely for the Owner's benefit.
The results and opinions in this report, based solely on the conditions found at the buildings on the evaluation date, are valid only on that date. The Preparer assumes no obligation to advise the client of any changes in any actual or potential lead-based paint hazards at those buildings beyond the date of the evaluation.
The lead inspection was performed to ready accessible components and surfaces. If suspected components that could contain lead are encountered underneath currently installed tiles or other construction material, they shall be managed as containing lead until the appropriate test is performed. According to the DRNA in the “Regulation for the Proper Management of Lead-Based Paint Activities” Rule 139 (Section E, Part 17), all lead-based paint reports have a validity period of five (5) years.
2.6 Abatement Conditions
As defined by HUD and the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DRNA) of Puerto Rico, abatement means any set of measures designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards. The people providing these services must be trained under the DRNA licensing/certification requirements. The product manufacturer and/or contractor must warrant abatement methods to last at least 20 years, or these methods must have a design life of at least 20 years.
• onsite or offsite removal of lead-based paint from substrates and components
• replacement of components or fixtures painted with lead-based paint
• permanent enclosure of lead-based paint with construction materials mechanically fastened to the substrate
• encapsulation of lead-based paint with specially designed encapsulant products
• removal or permanent covering (concrete or asphalt) of soil-lead-based paint hazards
If enclosure or encapsulation is conducted as an abatement method, the lead-based paint remains on the property, so ongoing lead-based paint maintenance is required.
2.7 Recommendations
According to the DRNA lead regulations, before demolishing a structure containing lead-based paint, the contaminated surfaces or substrates must be abated or removed. The waste generated has to be characterized to determine if the waste generated is hazardous or non-hazardous waste. The abatement firm must be certified as an abatement firm by the DRNA. Workers conducting abatement must be trained and certified as abatement workers by a training provider accredited by the DRNA.
2.8 Environmental Assessment Report Certification
Zimmetry Environmental Management Corp. has performed this lead-based paint inspection thoroughly and professionally, consistent with commonly accepted industry standards. The inspection was conducted on June 24, 2025, by Melanie Bermúdez, state-certified lead inspector LBPI-19224-232, and by Karla L. Sotomayor, state-certified lead inspector LBPI-34024-431, both qualified by experience, education, and training in the recognition of lead-based paint and approved sampling techniques using the Niton XLp-300A XRF, SN-25492 and the SciAps X550Pb, SN-03578, respectively.
Melanie Bermúdez Encarnación, BSc Environmental Lead Inspector
Karla Liz Sotomayor Reyes, Bsc.
Environmental Lead Inspector
Section 3: Appendices Appendix A: Certifications, Licenses, and Accreditations Appendix B: XRF Sampling Data Appendix C: XRF’s Performance Characteristics Sheet Appendix D: Photographic Record Appendix E: Location of Positive Materials
APPENDIX A
Certifications, Licenses and
Accreditations
APPENDIX B
XRF Sampling Data
PROJECT:
DATE: 6/24/2025
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
1 Calibration 1.00
2 Calibration 1.00
3 Calibration 1.00
4 Area 1-1 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
5 Area 1-1 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
6 Area 1-1 Wall B White Drywall 0.01 Negative
7 Area 1-1 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
8 Area 1-1 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
9 Area 1-1 Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
10 Area 1-2 Wall D White Concrete 0.03 Negative
11 Area 1-2 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
12 Area 1-2 Wall A White Concrete 1.30 Positive
13 Area 1-2 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
14 Area 1-2 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
15 Area 1-2 Window Casing Black Metal 0.01 Negative
16 Area 1-2 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
17 Area 1-2 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
18 Area 1-3 Wall A White Concrete 2.20 Positive
19 Area 1-3 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
20 Area 1-3 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
21 Area 1-3 Wall D White Concrete 4.40 Positive
22 Area 1-3 Wall D White Concrete 3.90 Positive
23 Area 1-3 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
24 Area 1-3 Door Green Metal 0.00 Negative
25 Area 1-3 Door Frame Green Metal 0.00 Negative
26 Area 1-4 Lower Wall A White Concrete 5.40 Positive
27 Area 1-4 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
28 Area 1-4 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
29 Area 1-4 Wall D White Drywall 0.02 Negative
30 Area 1-4 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
31 Area 1-4 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.02 Negative
32 Area 1-5 Wall A White Concrete 6.60 Positive
33 Area 1-5 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
34 Area 1-5 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
35 Area 1-5 Wall D White Drywall 0.03 Negative
36 Area 1-5 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
37 Area 1-5 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
38 Area 1-5 Door Gray Metal 0.01 Negative
39 Area 1-5 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
40 Area 1-5 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
41 Area 1-6 Wall C White Concrete 0.01 Negative
42 Area 1-6 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
43 Area 1-6 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
44 Area 1-6 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
45 Area 1-6 Door Varnish Wood 0.03 Negative
46 Area 1-6 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
47 Area 1-6 Door Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
48 Area 1-6 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
49 Area 1-7 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
50 Area 1-7 Wall B White Drywall 0.02 Negative
51 Area 1-7 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
52 Area 1-7 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
53 Area 1-7 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
54 Area 1-7 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.02 Negative
55 Area 1-7 Door Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
56 Area 1-7 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
57 Area 1-7 Floor Tile Cream Ceramic 0.01 Negative
58 Area 1-7 Toilet White Ceramic 0.02 Negative
59 Area 1-7 Lavatory White Ceramic 0.02 Negative
60 Area 1-8 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Bldg. #223 LBP Inspector: Melanie Bermúdez
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
61 Area 1-8 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
62 Area 1-8 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
63 Area 1-8 Wall D White Drywall 0.03 Negative
64 Area 1-8 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
65 Area 1-8 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
66 Area 1-8 Door Gray Metal 0.01 Negative
67 Area 1-8 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
68 Area 1-9 Wall C White Concrete 8.40 Positive
69 Area 1-9 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
70 Area 1-9 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
71 Area 1-9 Wall D White Drywall 0.03 Negative
72 Area 1-9 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
73 Area 1-9 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
74 Area 1-9 Door Gray Metal 0.02 Negative
75 Area 1-9 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
76 Area 1-9 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
77 Area 1-10 Wall A Gray Concrete 0.00 Negative
78 Area 1-10 Wall B Gray Drywall 0.03 Negative
79 Area 1-10 Wall C Gray Drywall 0.00 Negative
80 Area 1-10 Wall D Gray Drywall 0.00 Negative
81 Area 1-10 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
82 Area 1-10 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.02 Negative
83 Area 1-10 Door Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
84 Area 1-10 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
85 Area 1-10 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
86 Area 1-11 Wall C White Concrete 8.60 Positive
87 Area 1-11 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
88 Area 1-11 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
89 Area 1-11 Door Green Metal 0.03 Negative
90 Area 1-11 Door Frame Green Metal 0.00 Negative
91 Area 1-11 Door Transom Green Metal 0.00 Negative
92 Area 1-12 Toilet White Ceramic 0.02 Negative
93 Area 1-12 Lavatory White Ceramic 0.02 Negative
94 Area 1-12 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
95 Area 1-12 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
96 Area 1-12 Door Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
97 Area 1-12 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.01 Negative
98 Area 1-12 Floor Tile Cream Ceramic 0.03 Negative
99 Area 1-12 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
100 Area 1-12 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
101 Area 1-12 Wall C White Drywall 0.02 Negative
102 Area 1-12 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
103 Area 1-13 Door Green Metal 0.00 Negative
104 Area 1-13 Door Frame Green Metal 0.01 Negative
105 Area 1-13 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
106 Area 1-13 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
107 Area 1-13 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
108 Area 1-14 Wall A White Concrete 8.90 Positive
109 Area 1-14 Wall B Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
110 Area 1-14 Wall C Cream Drywall 0.02 Negative
111 Area 1-14 Wall D Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
112 Area 1-14 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
113 Area 1-14 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
114 Area 1-14 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.01 Negative
115 Area 1-14 Door Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
116 Area 1-14 Door Frame Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
117 Area 1-15 Wall A White Concrete 0.02 Negative
118 Area 1-15 Panel White Wood 0.00 Negative
119 Area 1-15 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
120 Area 1-15 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
LBP Inspector: Melanie BermúdezBldg. #223
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
121 Area 1-15 Wall D White Drywall 0.03 Negative
122 Area 1-15 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
123 Area 1-15 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
124 Area 1-15 Door Green Metal 0.00 Negative
125 Area 1-15 Door Frame Green Metal 0.01 Negative
126 Area 1-16 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
127 Area 1-16 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
128 Area 1-16 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
129 Area 1-16 Wall B White Drywall 0.02 Negative
130 Area 1-16 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
131 Area 1-16 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
132 Area 1-16 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
133 Area 1-16 Door Green Metal 0.01 Negative
134 Area 1-16 Door Frame Green Metal 0.01 Negative
135 Area 1-17 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
136 Area 1-17 Wall B Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
137 Area 1-17 Wall C Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
138 Area 1-17 Wall D Cream Drywall 0.03 Negative
139 Area 1-17 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
140 Area 1-17 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
141 Area 1-17 Door Green Metal 0.00 Negative
142 Area 1-17 Door Frame Green Metal 0.03 Negative
143 Area 1-17 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
144 Area 1-18 Wall A White Concrete 1.40 Positive
145 Area 1-18 Wall C White Concrete 2.60 Positive
146 Area 1-18 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
147 Area 1-18 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
148 Area 1-18 Window Casing Black Metal 0.02 Negative
149 Area 1-19 Wall A Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
150 Area 1-19 Wall B Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
151 Area 1-19 Wall C Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
152 Area 1-19 Wall D Cream Drywall 0.01 Negative
153 Area 1-19 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
154 Area 1-19 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
155 Area 1-19 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
156 Area 1-19 Door Green Metal 0.02 Negative
157 Area 1-19 Door Frame Green Metal 0.00 Negative
158 Area 1-20 Wall B White Concrete 0.00 Negative
159 Area 1-20 Wall C White Concrete 0.01 Negative
160 Area 1-20 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
161 Area 1-20 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
162 Area 1-20 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
163 Exterior Area, Side B Upper Wall B Cream Concrete 0.02 Negative
164 Exterior Area, Side B Upper Wall B Cream Concrete 0.50 Negative
165 Exterior Area, Side B Lower Wall B Red Concrete 7.70 Positive
166 Exterior Area, Side B Window Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
167 Exterior Area, Side B Soffit Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
168 Exterior Area, Side B Door Green Metal 0.01 Negative
169 Exterior Area, Side B Door Frame Green Metal 0.00 Negative
170 Exterior Area, Side B Steps Cream Concrete 2.00 Positive
171 Exterior Area, Side B Overhang Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
172 Exterior Area, Side B Stringer Red Concrete 1.40 Positive
173 Exterior Area, Side B Fascia Red Drywall 0.00 Negative
174 Exterior Area, Side C Upper Wall C Cream Concrete 3.60 Positive
175 Exterior Area, Side C Lower Wall C Red Concrete 2.80 Positive
176 Exterior Area, Side C Column Orange Concrete 1.50 Positive
177 Exterior Area, Side C Soffit Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
178 Exterior Area, Side C Window Molding Red Concrete 2.35 Positive
179 Exterior Area, Side C Fascia Red Drywall 0.00 Negative
180 Exterior Area, Side C Base White Concrete 0.00 Negative
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Bldg. #223 LBP Inspector: Melanie Bermúdez
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
181 Exterior Area, Side D Upper Wall D Cream Concrete 1.55 Positive
182 Exterior Area, Side D Lower Wall D White Concrete 1.80 Positive
183 Exterior Area, Side D Window Molding Red Concrete 3.30 Positive
184 Exterior Area, Side A Upper Wall A Cream Concrete 2.30 Positive
185 Exterior Area, Side A Lower Wall A Red Concrete 1.80 Positive
186 Exterior Area, Side A Window Molding Red Concrete 3.20 Positive
187 Exterior Area, Side A Column Orange Concrete 1.60 Positive
188 Exterior Area, Side A Soffit Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
189 Exterior Area, Side A Fascia Red Drywall 0.00 Negative
Bldg. #223
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
LBP Inspector: Melanie Bermúdez
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
190 Area 1-17 Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
191 Area 1-17 Wall B Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
192 Area 1-17 Wall C Cream Concrete 0.02 Negative
193 Area 1-17 Wall D Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
194 Area 1-17 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
195 Area 1-17 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
196 Calibration 1.00
197 Calibration 1.00
198 Calibration 1.00
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Bldg. #224 LBP Inspector: Melanie Bermúdez
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
1 Calibration 1.00
2 Calibration 1.00
3 Calibration 1.00
4 Exterior Area, Side A Wall Cream Concrete 9.30 Positive
5 Exterior Area, Side A Wall Cream Concrete 7.09 Positive
6 Exterior Area, Side A Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
7 Exterior Area, Side A Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
8 Exterior Area, Side A Column Cream Concrete 4.29 Positive
9 Exterior Area, Side A Molding Red Concrete 0.02 Negative
10 Exterior Area, Side A Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
11 Exterior Area, Side A Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
12 Exterior Area, Side A Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
13 Exterior Area, Side A Fascia Red Concrete 0.01 Negative
14 Exterior Area, Side A Fascia Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
15 Exterior Area, Side A Fascia Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
16 Exterior Area, Side A Steps Gray Concrete 0.04 Negative
17 Exterior Area, Side A Riser Gray Concrete 0.10 Negative
18 Exterior Area, Side A Soffit White Concrete 0.00 Negative
19 Exterior Area, Side A Soffit White Concrete 0.00 Negative
20 Exterior Area, Side A Soffit White Concrete 0.00 Negative
21 Exterior Area, Side A Stringer Gray Concrete 0.32 Negative
22 Exterior Area, Side A Pipeline Green Metal 0.00 Negative
23 Exterior Area, Side A Wall Red Concrete 1.08 Positive
24 Exterior Area, Side B Wall Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
25 Exterior Area, Side B Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
26 Exterior Area, Side B Column Cream Concrete 0.01 Negative
27 Exterior Area, Side B Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
28 Exterior Area, Side B Fascia Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
29 Exterior Area, Side B Beam Green Metal 0.00 Negative
30 Exterior Area, Side B Ramp Gray Concrete 0.02 Negative
31 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 5.93 Positive
32 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Red Concrete 5.30 Positive
33 Exterior Area, Side C Column Cream Concrete 6.55 Positive
34 Exterior Area, Side C Molding Red Concrete 4.00 Positive
35 Exterior Area, Side C Fascia Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
36 Exterior Area, Side C Molding Red Concrete 4.40 Positive
37 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
38 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
39 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 0.03 Negative
40 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
41 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
42 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Red Concrete 0.01 Negative
43 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
44 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
45 Exterior Area, Side C Lower Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
46 Exterior Area, Side C Lower Wall Red Concrete 0.03 Negative
47 Exterior Area, Side C Lower Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
48 Exterior Area, Side C Pipeline Green Metal 0.00 Negative
49 Exterior Area, Side C Beam Green Metal 0.00 Negative
50 Exterior Area, Side C Bollard Yellow Metal 0.42 Negative
51 Exterior Area, Side C Bollard Yellow Metal 1.67 Positive
52 Exterior Area, Side C Bollard Yellow Metal 2.00 Positive
53 Exterior Area, Side C Base Yellow Concrete 0.00 Negative
54 Exterior Area, Side C Base Yellow Concrete 0.00 Negative
55 Exterior Area, Side C Molding Red Concrete 0.03 Negative
56 Exterior Area, Side C Wall Cream Concrete 2.46 Positive
57 Exterior Area, Side C Column Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
58 Exterior Area, Side C Column Cream Concrete 0.17 Negative
59 Exterior Area, Side C Molding Red Concrete 2.30 Positive
60 Area 1-1 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Bldg. #224 LBP Inspector: Karla L. Sotomayor
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
61 Area 1-1 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
62 Area 1-1 Wall D White Drywall 0.01 Negative
63 Area 1-1 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
64 Area 1-1 Wall B White Concrete 0.00 Negative
65 Area 1-1 Wall B White Concrete 0.00 Negative
66 Area 1-1 Wall C White Concrete 0.02 Negative
67 Area 1-1 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
68 Area 1-1 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
69 Area 1-1 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
70 Area 1-1 Door Blue Metal 0.03 Negative
71 Area 1-1 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
72 Area 1-2 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
73 Area 1-2 Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
74 Area 1-2 Wall B White Concrete 0.02 Negative
75 Area 1-2 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
76 Area 1-2 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
77 Area 1-2 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
78 Area 1-3 Wall A White Concrete 0.01 Negative
79 Area 1-3 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
80 Area 1-3 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
81 Area 1-3 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
82 Area 1-3 Door Varnish Wood 0.01 Negative
83 Area 1-3 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
84 Area 1-4 Wall A White Drywall 0.00 Negative
85 Area 1-4 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
86 Area 1-4 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
87 Area 1-4 Wall C White Concrete 0.03 Negative
88 Area 1-4 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
89 Area 1-4 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
90 Area 1-5 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
91 Area 1-5 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.02 Negative
92 Area 1-5 Floor Tile Cream Ceramic 0.01 Negative
93 Area 1-5 Wall A Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
94 Area 1-5 Wall B Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
95 Area 1-5 Wall C Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
96 Area 1-5 Wall D Cream Plastic 0.02 Negative
97 Area 1-5 Toilet White Ceramic 0.01 Negative
98 Area 1-5 Lavatory White Ceramic 0.01 Negative
99 Area 1-5 Urinal White Ceramic 0.03 Negative
100 Area 1-6 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
101 Area 1-6 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
102 Area 1-6 Wall A White Plastic 0.00 Negative
103 Area 1-6 Wall B White Plastic 0.01 Negative
104 Area 1-6 Wall C White Plastic 0.00 Negative
105 Area 1-6 Wall D White Plastic 0.00 Negative
106 Area 1-7 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
107 Area 1-7 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.03 Negative
108 Area 1-7 Floor Tile Cream Ceramic 0.03 Negative
109 Area 1-7 Wall A Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
110 Area 1-7 Wall B Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
111 Area 1-7 Wall C Cream Plastic 0.00 Negative
112 Area 1-7 Wall D Cream Plastic 0.02 Negative
113 Area 1-7 Toilet White Ceramic 0.01 Negative
114 Area 1-7 Lavatory White Ceramic 0.02 Negative
115 Area 1-8 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
116 Area 1-8 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
117 Area 1-8 Wall A White Concrete 5.30 Positive
118 Area 1-8 Wall C White Concrete 0.02 Negative
119 Area 1-8 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
120 Area 1-8 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
LBP Inspector: Karla L. SotomayorBldg. #224
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
121 Area 1-8 Wall D White Concrete 0.00 Negative
122 Area 1-9 Door Varnish Wood 0.01 Negative
123 Area 1-9 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
124 Area 1-9 Wall A Cream Concrete 1.30 Positive
125 Area 1-9 Wall B Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
126 Area 1-9 Wall D Cream Drywall 0.00 Negative
127 Area 1-9 Wall B Cream Concrete 0.02 Negative
128 Area 1-9 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
129 Area 1-9 Wall C Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
130 Area 1-10 Wall A White Concrete 0.01 Negative
131 Area 1-10 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
132 Area 1-10 Wall B White Concrete 0.00 Negative
133 Area 1-10 Wall D White Concrete 0.00 Negative
134 Area 1-10 Wall B White Drywall 0.02 Negative
135 Area 1-10 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
136 Area 1-10 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
137 Area 1-10 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
138 Area 1-10 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.03 Negative
139 Area 1-10 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
140 Area 1-10 Beam White Concrete 0.00 Negative
141 Area 1-11 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
142 Area 1-11 Wall A White Drywall 0.01 Negative
143 Area 1-11 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
144 Area 1-11 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
145 Area 1-11 Shelves White Wood 0.00 Negative
146 Area 1-12 Lower Wall A White Concrete 2.56 Positive
147 Area 1-12 Lower Wall A White Concrete 2.01 Positive
148 Area 1-12 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
149 Area 1-12 Wall B White Concrete 0.00 Negative
150 Area 1-12 Upper Wall C White Concrete 0.39 Negative
151 Area 1-12 Door White Metal 0.00 Negative
152 Area 1-12 Door Frame White Metal 0.00 Negative
153 Area 1-12 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
154 Area 1-12 Window Casing Black Metal 0.03 Negative
155 Area 1-12 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
156 Area 1-12 Door Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
157 Area 1-12 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.00 Negative
158 Area 1-12 Wall D White Concrete 0.01 Negative
159 Area 1-12 Lower Wall C White Concrete 4.10 Positive
160 Area 1-12 Lower Wall C White Concrete 3.42 Positive
161 Area 1-12 Lower Wall C White Concrete 3.47 Positive
162 Area 1-12 Lower Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
163 Exterior Area, Side D Wall Cream Concrete 0.00 Negative
164 Exterior Area, Side D Wall Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
165 Exterior Area, Side D Column Cream Concrete 0.02 Negative
166 Exterior Area, Side D Molding Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
167 Exterior Area, Side D Fascia Red Concrete 0.00 Negative
168 Exterior Area, Side D Beam Green Metal 0.00 Negative
169 Area 1-13 Wall A White Drywall 0.01 Negative
170 Area 1-13 Wall A White Concrete 6.30 Positive
171 Area 1-13 Partition White Drywall 0.00 Negative
172 Area 1-13 Partition White Drywall 0.00 Negative
173 Area 1-13 Partition White Drywall 0.02 Negative
174 Area 1-13 Wall D White Concrete 0.00 Negative
175 Area 1-13 Wall C White Concrete 0.00 Negative
176 Area 1-13 Wall B White Drywall 0.00 Negative
177 Area 1-13 Door Varnish Wood 0.01 Negative
178 Area 1-13 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
179 Area 1-13 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
180 Area 1-13 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
Bldg. #224 LBP Inspector: Karla L. Sotomayor
Sample ID. Functional Space Location Color Subst.
XRF Reading mg/cm2 Pos/Neg Comments
181 Area 1-13 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
182 Area 1-13 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.03 Negative
183 Area 1-13 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
184 Area 1-13 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
185 Area 1-13 Window Casing Black Metal 0.00 Negative
186 Area 1-13 Window Casing Black Metal 0.01 Negative
187 Area 1-14 Lower Wall A White Concrete 3.57 Positive
188 Area 1-14 Wall B White Wood 0.00 Negative
189 Area 1-14 Wall D White Wood 0.00 Negative
190 Area 1-14 Wall C White Drywall 0.01 Negative
191 Area 1-14 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
192 Area 1-14 Electrical Panel Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
193 Area 1-14 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
194 Area 1-14 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.03 Negative
195 Area 1-14 Beam Red Metal 0.00 Negative
196 Area 1-14 Beam Red Metal 0.00 Negative
197 Area 1-15 Lower Wall A White Concrete 2.08 Positive
198 Area 1-15 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
199 Area 1-15 Electrical Panel Gray Metal 0.00 Negative
200 Area 1-15 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
201 Area 1-15 Door Frame Blue Metal 0.02 Negative
202 Area 1-15 Beam Red Metal 0.00 Negative
203 Area 1-15 Beam Red Metal 0.00 Negative
204 Area 1-15 Wall B White Wood 0.00 Negative
205 Area 1-15 Wall B White Drywall 0.01 Negative
206 Area 1-15 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
207 Area 1-15 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
208 Area 1-16 Lower Wall A White Concrete 3.30 Positive
209 Area 1-16 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
210 Area 1-16 Upper Wall A White Concrete 0.00 Negative
211 Area 1-16 Wall B White Drywall 0.03 Negative
212 Area 1-16 Wall C White Drywall 0.00 Negative
213 Area 1-16 Wall D White Drywall 0.00 Negative
214 Area 1-16 Partition White Drywall 0.00 Negative
215 Area 1-16 Door Varnish Wood 0.01 Negative
216 Area 1-16 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
217 Area 1-16 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
218 Area 1-16 Door Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
219 Area 1-16 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.02 Negative
220 Area 1-16 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
221 Area 1-16 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
222 Area 1-16 Door Frame Varnish Wood 0.00 Negative
223 Calibration 1.00
224 Calibration 1.00
225 Calibration 1.00
Bldg. #224
Buildings #223 & #224 Located at USAG Fort Buchanan, Guaynabo PR CLIENT: Fort Buchanan
LBP Inspector: Karla L. Sotomayor
APPENDIX C
XRF Performance Characteristic
Sheet
Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1
Performance Characteristic Sheet
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004 EDITION NO.: 1
MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:
Make: Niton LLC Tested Model: XLp 300 Source: 109Cd Note: This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated below, for the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, in the XLi and XLp series:
XLi 300A, XLi 301A, XLi 302A and XLi 303A.
XLp 300A, XLp 301A, XLp 302A and XLp 303A.
XLi 700A, XLi 701A, XLi 702A and XLi 703A.
XLp 700A, XLp 701A, XLp 702A, and XLp 703A.
Note: The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument. The differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available, in addition to Lead-in- Paint modes. The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are identical for the source, detector, and detector electronics relative to the Lead-in-Paint mode.
FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode.
XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:
0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm2 (inclusive)
The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film).
If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds.
SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:
For XRF results using Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, substrate correction is not needed for:
Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Metal, Plaster, and Wood
INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:
K+L MODE
READING DESCRIPTION
SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD
(mg/cm2)
Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate
Brick Concrete Drywall Metal
Plaster Wood
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:
This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPA/HUD evaluation using archived building components. Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations. The instruments that were used to perform the testing had new sources; one instrument’s was installed in November 2003 with 40 mCi initial strength, and the other’s was installed June 2004 with 40 mCi initial strength.
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.
SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION:
Substrate correction is not needed for brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster or wood when using Lead-in- Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the normal operating mode for these instruments. If substrate correction is desired, refer to Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for substrate bias.
EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:
Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing. Use the K+L variable time mode readings.
Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.
Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below.
Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:
Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. Do not correct the original or retest results for substrate bias. In single-family housing a result is defined as the average of three readings. In multifamily housing, a result is a single reading.
Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units.
Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each testing combination.
Square the average for each testing combination.
Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.
Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.
Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.
Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.
Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.
Compute the average of all ten original XRF results.
Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF results.
Find the absolute difference of the two averages.
If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient.
Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.
TESTING TIMES:
For the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the instrument continues to read until it is moved away from the testing surface, terminated by the user, or the instrument software indicates the reading is complete. The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode. The times have been adjusted for source decay, normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above. Source strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times. At the time of testing, the instruments had source strengths of 26.6 and 36.6 mCi.
Testing Times Using K+L Reading Mode (Seconds)
All Data Median for laboratory-measured lead levels (mg/cm2)
Substrate 25th Percentile
Median 75th Percentile
Pb < 0.25 0.25 < Pb<1.0 1.0 < Pb
Wood Drywall
4 11 19 11 15 11
Metal
4 12 18 9 12 14
Brick Concrete Plaster
8 16 22 15 18 16
CLASSIFICATION RESULTS:
XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the threshold, and negative if they are less than the threshold.
DOCUMENTATION:
A document titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to construct the data in the sheets, and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. For a copy of this document call the National Lead Information Center Clearinghouse at 1-800-424-LEAD.
This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest Research Institute (MRI) and QuanTech, Inc., under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer. HUD has determined that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint Inspection, of HUD’s Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing.
SciAps X-550 PCS February 2022 Action Level: 1.0 mg/cm2
Performance Characteristic Sheet EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2022
MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:
Make: SciAps Models: Model X-550
X-Ray Source: Rhodium (Rh) or Gold (Au) Anode
FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE
ACTION LEVEL SETTING:
1.0 mg/cm2
OPERATING PARAMETERS:
Timed mode: fixed 10-second reading.
Quick mode: variable-time reading (approximately 2-6 seconds).
XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:
0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm2 (inclusive) on NIST SRM 2579 (1.02 mg/cm2)/NIST SRM 2573, or equivalent
SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:
Not applicable
INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:
Au Anode (quick)
READING DESCRIPTION
SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD (mg/cm2)
Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate
Brick 1.0 Concrete 1.0 Drywall 1.0 Metal 1.0
Plaster 1.0 Wood 1.0
Rh Anode (Timed or Quick), Au Anode (Timed)
READING DESCRIPTION
SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD (mg/cm2)
Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate
Brick 0.9 Concrete 0.9 Drywall 0.9 Metal 0.9
Plaster 0.9 Wood 0.9
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:
This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the
Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, 2012 Edition ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated using test results on building components in the HUD archive.
Testing was conducted on 146 test samples in February 2022, with two separate instruments of each Anode type, operated in both Timed and Quick modes.
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.
XRF CALIBRATION CHECK:
The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film; for NIST SRM 2579a, use film 2573 (1.04 mg/cm2).
If the average (rounded to 1 decimal place) of three readings is outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instrument into control before XRF testing proceeds.
EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:
Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing.
Conduct XRF re-testing at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.
Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below. Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:
Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. In single-family and multi-family housing, a result is defined as a single reading. Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units.
Calculate the average of the original XRF result and the retest XRF result for each testing combination.
Square the average for each testing combination.
Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.
Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.
Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.
Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.
Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.
Compute the average of all ten original XRF readings.
Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF readings.
Find the absolute difference of the two averages.
If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient.
Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.
TESTING TIMES:
The reading time in Archive tests was 10 seconds in Timed mode and from 2-6 seconds in Quick mode, for both the Rh Anode and Au Anode.
CLASSIFICATION OF RESULTS:
XRF results for the Au Anode in Quick mode are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 and negative if they are less than to 1.0 mg/cm2. XRF results for the Au Anode in Timed mode and for the Rh Anode in Timed or Quick mode are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to 0.9 mg/cm2 and negative if they are less than to 0.9 mg/cm2
DOCUMENTATION:
A report titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets (EPA 747-R-95-008) provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to develop Performance Characteristic Sheets at the Federal standard (Action Level) of 1.0 mg/cm2 and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. The report may be downloaded at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/methodology-xrf-performance-characteristic-sheets-epa-747-r-95-008-september- 1997.
http://www2.epa.gov/lead/methodology-xrf-performance-characteristic-sheets-epa-747-r-95-008-september-1997 http://www2.epa.gov/lead/methodology-xrf-performance-characteristic-sheets-epa-747-r-95-008-september-1997
APPENDIX D
Photographic Record
Photo No.
Date:
06/24/2025
Description:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-2 Lead-based painted concrete wall surface (Side A).
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-3
Photographic Documentation is for reference purposes and doesn’t necessarily include all the surfaces with lead.
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-3 surface (Side C).
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-4 Lead-based painted concrete lower wall surface (Side A).
Photographic Documentation is for reference purposes and doesn’t necessarily include all the surfaces with
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-5
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-9
Photographic Documentation is for reference purposes and doesn’t necessarily include all the surfaces with
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-11
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-14
Photographic Documentation is for reference purposes and doesn’t necessarily include all the surfaces with
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-18
Date:
Bldg. #223, Area 1-18
Photographic Documentation is for reference purposes and doesn’t necessarily include all the surfaces with
Date:
Bldg. #223, Exterior Area (Side B) Lead-based painted concrete lower wall surface, steps and stringer.
Date:
Exterior Area (Side B) Lead-based painted concrete lower…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .