2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 6 – Sample Scoring Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY24 ICE 9MM Luger Caliber Readily Identifiable Training Ammunition Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70CMSW24R00000010
- Issued by
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
About this file
This document is a Sample Scoring Sheet for evaluating proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for 9mm Luger Readily Identifiable Training Ammunition (RITA).
The RFP is for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency to procure 70,000,000 rounds of 9mm RITA ammunition over a base year plus four option years. The scoring sheet provides detailed criteria for evaluating proposals across several key areas including compliance with the Statement of Work, packaging requirements, ballistic performance, and function. Proposals will be rated as Outstanding, Very Good, Acceptable, or Unacceptable based on the total points scored out of a possible 12. The RFP is unrestricted, allowing both large and small businesses to submit proposals under the associated NAICS code.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.1- RFP_Attachment 5 - Sample Subcontracting Plan_r1.doc | DOC document | |
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 4 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 5 - Sample Subcontracting Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 2 - Ordering Procedures.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2.2.1-RFP_70CMSW24R00000010_RITA.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 7 - RFP Questions Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2.2.1-RFP - Attachment 3 - Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| SCORING | Sample_________________________ |
| 9mm READILY IDENTIFIABLE TRAINING AMMUNITION | Raters Name_____________________ |
| SOLICITATION ? | Date___________________________ |
Guidance SOW Section Score Comments
| Basic Compliance | Quality Management System | 3.3 | Pass / Fail | |
| Sample Size | 3.4.1 | Pass / Fail | ||
| Documentation | 3.5 | |||
| Missing any documentation = 0 | ||||
| Supplied all required documentation = 2 | ||||
| Packaging | 3.6 | |||
| Missing any packaging requirements = 0 | ||||
| Met all packaging requirements = 2 | ||||
| Cartridge | 3.7 | Pass / Fail | ||
| 3.7.4 | Readily distinguishable Pass / Fail | |||
| Pressure | 3.8 | Pass / Fail | ||
| Major Requirements | Velocity | 3.9 | ||
| Standard Deviation | > 30 fps = Fail | |||
| > 10 fps, ≤ to 30 fps = 0 | ||||
| ≤ 10 fps = 1 | ||||
| Precision Grouping - Test Barrel | 3.10.1 | |||
| Extreme Spread | > 2.0" = Fail | |||
| > 1.5", ≤ 2.0" = 0 | ||||
| > 1.0", ≤ 1.5" = 1 | ||||
| ≤ 1.0" = 2 | ||||
| Evidence of keyholing | Pass / Fail | |||
| Precision Grouping - Firearm | 3.10.2 | |||
| Extreme Spread | > 3.5" = Fail | |||
| > 2.5", ≤ 3.5" = 0 | ||||
| > 1.5", ≤ 2.5" = 1 | ||||
| ≤ 1.5" = 2 | ||||
| Evidence of keyholing | Pass / Fail | |||
| Ballistic Match | 3.11 | |||
| > 1.5" = Fail | ||||
| > 0.75", ≤ 1.5" = 0 | ||||
| ≤ 0.75" = 1 | ||||
| Evidence of keyholing | Pass / Fail | |||
| Function | 3.12 | |||
| Type 1, Type 2, or Type 3 | > Five Type 1, 2, or 3 Malfunctions = Fail | |||
| malfunctions | > 0, ≤ 5 Type 1, 2, or 3 Malfunctions = 0 | |||
| Zero (0) Type 1, 2, or 3 Malfunctions = 2 | ||||
| Evidence of keyholing | Pass / Fail | |||
| OVERALL TOTAL SCORE | /12 |
| Rating Score Key | |
| Outstanding = 9 - 12 points (no Fails) | Sample Rating_________________________ |
| Very Good = 5 - 8 points (no Fails) | Raters Signature_______________________ |
| Acceptable = 0 - 4 points (no Fails) | |
| Unacceptable = One or more Fails |
&16Source Evaluation Plan Attachment 2.B
&18FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page &P of &N
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .