2.04b QASP.pdf
PDF 196 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EOD Diving: Administrative and Logistics Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6883625QS056
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for an administrative and logistics support contract for EOD Diving services issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The QASP outlines a systematic method for the government to verify contractor performance, with key performance elements including contractor quality, contractor response, quality control, invoicing, contract deliverables, overall contract performance, and regulatory compliance.
The surveillance methodology involves inspection by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) across multiple dimensions, with most performance elements requiring >95% compliance and some requiring 100% accuracy. The plan includes potential consequences for unsatisfactory performance, such as contract termination, loss of future government contracts, and non-exercise of contract options. If performance metrics are not met, the government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), requiring the contractor to respond within 5 days with a prevention plan. The contractor is also incentivized to provide quality work, as the government can require work corrections at no additional cost.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Question Answer Amd 01.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment N6883625QS056 Amd 01.pdf | ||
| 2.04e DD254.pdf | ||
| 2.04c Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| 2.04 SF 1449 - N6883625QS056.pdf | ||
| 2.04d Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| 2.04a CDRL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
To ensure that the Government has an effective and systematic method of surveillance for the services in the PWS, a QASP will be used primarily as a tool to verify that the contractor is performing all services required by the PWS in a timely, accurate and complete fashion.
Performance Standards
a. Schedule - The due dates for deliverables and the actual accomplishment of the schedule will be assessed against original due dates and milestones established for the contract or task order(s).
b. Deliverables – The deliverables required to be submitted will be assessed against the specifications for the deliverables detailed in the contract/task order(s) and the Quality Control Plan (QCP), if required by the contract, for the required content, quality, timeliness, and accuracy.
c. Past Performance - In addition to any schedule, deliverables, and cost aspects of performance discussed above, pursuant to FAR 42.15, the Government will assess the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship, the contractor’s adherence to contract schedules including the administrative aspects of performance, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer.
Surveillance Methods: The primary methods of surveillance used to monitor the performance of this contract will include, but not be limited to, random or planned sampling, periodic inspection, and validated customer complaints.
Performance Measurement: Performance will be measured in accordance with the following table:
Performance Element Performance Requirement
Surveillance Method
Frequency Acceptable Quality Level
Contractor Quality Activities, facilities, deliveries as required by the PWS
Inspection by the
COR
Upon completion of activities as required for corrective action
>95% compliance
Contractor Response Activities, facilities, deliveries as required by the PWS
Inspection by the
COR
As required for Corrective Action
100% compliance
Quality Control Satisfactory Course Evaluations
Inspection by the
COR
Upon event completion
>95% of evaluations rate course as “Satisfactory”.
Invoicing Invoices per contract procedures are timely and accurate.
Review & acceptance of the invoice by the
COR
Upon completion of each event
100% accuracy
Contract Deliverables Contract deliverables furnished as prescribed in the PWS.
Inspection by the
COR
100% inspection of all contract deliverables.
>95% of deliverables performed/submitted timely
Overall Contract Performance
Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to
Assessment by the COR
Annual All performance elements rated Satisfactory (or higher) earn a Satisfactory (or higher) rating in the COR’s annual report on Contractor Performance
Regulatory Compliance
Report labor hours pursuant to ECRMA;
comply with FAR Clause 52.222-50 (human Trafficking)
COR observation, documented performance
Annual 100% compliance
If performance is within acceptable levels, it will be considered to be satisfactory. If not, overall performance may be considered unsatisfactory.
Incentives/Disincentives:
The COR makes an annual report on Contractor Performance via CPARS or other annual report that may be required. The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract/task order and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts/task orders. The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order may result in the non-exercise of available options.
For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.
In accordance with the inspection of services provisions of the contract, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional cost, to replace or correct work that fails to meet contract requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .