Vol_II_-_Past_Performance_Relevancy_Individual_Determination..doc

DOC document 58 KB Posted

Attached to
Trial Advocacy and Related Training Services
Solicitation number
1605DC-19-R-00047
Issued by

About this file

Volume II Past Performance Relevancy Individual Determination

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_1605DC-19-R-00047_-_Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation No. 1605DC-19-R-00047

Trial Advocacy and Related Training Services Attachment 5 Recency/Relevancy Determination

Factor 3 – CURRENT/PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

RECENCY/RELEVANCY DETERMINATION

OFFEROR: _____________

(Check as applicable)

FORMCHECKBOX

Individual Rating: ________ /Individual Evaluator: ______________________

Instruction to Evaluator: Upon review of performance information provided each Offeror, check the appropriate box indicating relevancy of each of information to the scope of work required under subject solicitation. Provide supporting rationale for any reference information deemed “relevant,” or “not relevant.” The table below defines recency and relevancy.

Table 3a: Recency/Relevancy Definitions

Recency: To be recent, effort must be active or completed within the past three years (3) from the issue date of the RFQ. Efforts completed before the issue date are not deemed to meet the definition of recent.

Relevancy Definitions: The Government will perform an independent determination of relevancy of the data provided or obtained. A relevancy determination will be made for each of the recent three (3) submitted contracts referenced. The Government is not bound by the Service Provider’s opinion of relevancy. The following relevancy criteria apply:

Relevancy Rating
Definitions
Relevant
Effort must be similar in size, scope, complexity to services described in the PWS for this RFQ. The government is not bound by a vendor’s opinion of relevancy.
Not Relevant
Effort is not similar in size, scope, complexity to services described in the PWS for this RFQ. The government is not bound by a vendor’s opinion of relevancy.

EVALUATOR: _____________________________ (applicable to individual evaluation)

REFERENCE #1: XXXXX

Recent: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X

Company Name
Relevant

Not Relevant

POC:

Contract Number:

Dollar Amount:

Performance Period:

REFERENCE #2: XXXXX

Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X

Company Name
Relevant
Not Relevant

POC:

Contract Number:

Dollar Amount:

Performance Period:

REFERENCE #3: XXXXX

Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X

Company Name
Relevant
Not Relevant

POC:

Contract Number:

Dollar Amount:

Performance Period:

File details come from the government source that posted it.