Vol_II_-_Past_Performance_Relevancy_Individual_Determination..doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Trial Advocacy and Related Training Services
- Solicitation number
- 1605DC-19-R-00047
About this file
Volume II Past Performance Relevancy Individual Determination
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1605DC-19-R-00047_-_Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No. 1605DC-19-R-00047
Trial Advocacy and Related Training Services Attachment 5 Recency/Relevancy Determination
Factor 3 – CURRENT/PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
RECENCY/RELEVANCY DETERMINATION
OFFEROR: _____________
(Check as applicable)
FORMCHECKBOX
Individual Rating: ________ /Individual Evaluator: ______________________
Instruction to Evaluator: Upon review of performance information provided each Offeror, check the appropriate box indicating relevancy of each of information to the scope of work required under subject solicitation. Provide supporting rationale for any reference information deemed “relevant,” or “not relevant.” The table below defines recency and relevancy.
Table 3a: Recency/Relevancy Definitions
Recency: To be recent, effort must be active or completed within the past three years (3) from the issue date of the RFQ. Efforts completed before the issue date are not deemed to meet the definition of recent.
Relevancy Definitions: The Government will perform an independent determination of relevancy of the data provided or obtained. A relevancy determination will be made for each of the recent three (3) submitted contracts referenced. The Government is not bound by the Service Provider’s opinion of relevancy. The following relevancy criteria apply:
| Relevancy Rating |
| Definitions |
| Relevant |
| Effort must be similar in size, scope, complexity to services described in the PWS for this RFQ. The government is not bound by a vendor’s opinion of relevancy. |
| Not Relevant |
| Effort is not similar in size, scope, complexity to services described in the PWS for this RFQ. The government is not bound by a vendor’s opinion of relevancy. |
EVALUATOR: _____________________________ (applicable to individual evaluation)
REFERENCE #1: XXXXX
Recent: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X
| Company Name |
| Relevant |
Not Relevant
POC:
Contract Number:
Dollar Amount:
Performance Period:
REFERENCE #2: XXXXX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X
| Company Name |
| Relevant |
| Not Relevant |
POC:
Contract Number:
Dollar Amount:
Performance Period:
REFERENCE #3: XXXXX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX NO Mark appropriate box with an X
| Company Name |
| Relevant |
| Not Relevant |
POC:
Contract Number:
Dollar Amount:
Performance Period:
File details come from the government source that posted it.