PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1605DC-17-R-00013
About this file
MS Word Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1605DC-17-R-00013_RFP_Amendment_000001.pdf | ||
| 1605DC-17-R-00013_RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
Source Selection Information – Sensitive
The offeror is required to electronically complete the top portion (only) of this Past Performance Questionnaire. The offer will then send the questionnaire to the respective organization and request that the completed questionnaire be e-mailed to the Contract Specialist at no later than [The due date of the solicitation].
** THIS SECTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR**
Offeror (Company Name):
Customer (Reference):
Customer Phone Number:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Brief Description of Contract/Requirement:
NAICS Code (if applicable):
** THIS SECTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE**
The ratings below are to be provided by the organization identified above, and submitted to the Contract Specialist provided to you. The organization requesting the reference will provide you with the due date and time.
Answers to Questions 1-6 are based on information obtained from the named organization, not the offeror. Ratings to be used are: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Neutral. Ratings should be supported with the appropriate comments. Anything less than an overall rating of satisfactory will constitute an unacceptable level of risk. Neutral ratings for past performance will be assigned when there is no past performance history available. Neutral ratings will not penalize the offeror and will result in the offerors proposal being further evaluated.
The following chart depicts the ratings that are to be used to evaluate the contractor’s performance:
| Rating |
| Definitions |
| Exceptional |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| The contractor’s performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions, |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The contractor’s performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No relevant past performance record is available for evaluation. |
References should evaluate performance of the offeror identified within this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor for the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control) and provide contractors rebuttal statement. An individual within your organization that is knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.
1. Quality of Services Rating: Choose an item.
Comments: Click here to enter rationale for the chosen rating.
2. Timeliness of Performance
Comments: Click here to enter rationale for the chosen rating.
3. Business Relations
Comments: Click here to enter rationale for the chosen rating.
4. Personnel Management
5. Subcontractor Management
6. Overall Performance
7. Would you do business with this company again? Choose an item.
8. Questionnaire completed by:
Name/Title
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Email Address
Date
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .