Past_Performance_Substitute_Form_Amendment_00.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted Dec 19, 2018

Attached to: Legal Orientation Program for Expedited Removal (LOPE) Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: 15JE1R18Q00000002
Issued by: Department of Justice Offices Boards and Divisions Executive Office for Immigration Review

About this file

From the source

Amendment 02 includes Attachment C (Past Performance Substitute Form) herein.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Legal Orientation Program for Expedited Removal (LOPE) Support Services, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Amendment_01.pdf	PDF	Dec 18, 2018
Solicitation.pdf	PDF	Dec 7, 2018

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE SUBSTITUTE FORM

ATTACHMENT C

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

This form is for the evaluation of past performance purposes only. This form shall only be used for all Non-US Federal and/or US Federal Contracts or Orders that do not have past performance information in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) to report on the Contractor that was awarded the Contract or Order.

The Assessing Official shall be an individual who has knowledge of the Contract or Order and be authorized to provide such a rating.

The Government will use this information for source selection purposes and will not disclose any information to anyone outside the Evaluation Team.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Bjorn Miller at bjorn.miller@usdoj.gov.

Evaluators should submit the completed and signed form directly to Mr. Bjorn Miller at bjorn.miller@usdoj.gov.

Offerors shall submit a copy of this form with their Quote if the project has a period of performance less than one year.

2. COMPANY INFORMATION (OFFEROR TO COMPLETE)

The Offeror shall complete Section 2 on behalf of the Assessing Official.

A. Company Name:

B. DUNS Number:

C. Address:

D. Contract or Order Number:

3. EVALUATION AREAS (ASSESSING OFFICIAL TO COMPLETE)

The Assessing Official shall rate each of the six Evaluation Areas, as applicable, using the following adjectival ratings and their definitions:

The following Adjectival Ratings and Definitions apply to Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management and Regulatory Compliance:

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contained reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contained serious problem(s) for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were ineffective.

N/A

N/A shall be used if the aforementioned ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

The following Adjectival Ratings and Definitions apply to Utilization of Small Business:

Exceptional

Exceeded all statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had exceptional success with initiatives to assist, promote, and utilize small business (SB), small disadvantaged business (SDB), womenowned small business (WOSB), HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business (VOSB) and service disabled veteran owned small business (SDVOSB). Complied with FAR 52.219- 8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Went above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan and other small business requirements of the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

Very Good

Met all of the statutory goals or goals as negotiated. Had significant success with initiatives to assist, promote and utilize SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Complied with FAR 52.219- 8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met or exceeded any other small business participation requirements incorporated in the contract/order, including the use of small businesses in mission critical aspects of the program. Endeavored to go above and beyond the required elements of the subcontracting plan. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

Satisfactory

Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the various socio-economic categories for the current period. Complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Met any other small business participation requirements included in the contract/order. Fulfilled the requirements of the subcontracting plan included in the contract/order. Completed and submitted Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor has addressed or taken corrective action. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order. 18 Reference FAR 42.1503 Table 42-2 Attachment 2 Evaluation Ratings Definitions A2-3 Subcontract Reports in an accurate and timely manner.

Marginal

Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Failed to satisfy one or more requirements of a corrective action plan currently in place; however, does show an interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level and has demonstrated a commitment to apply the necessary resources to do so. Required a corrective action plan.

Unsatisfactory

Noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract/order. Did not submit Individual Subcontract Reports and/or Summary Subcontract Reports in an accurate or timely manner. Showed little interest in bringing performance to a satisfactory level or is generally uncooperative. Required a corrective action plan.

N/A

N/A shall be used if the aforementioned ratings are not going to be applied to this area for evaluation.

A. QUALITY (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

Comments: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B. Schedule (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

C. Cost Control (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

D. Management (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

E. Utilization of Small Business (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

F. Regulatory Compliance (Choose from one of the below adjectival ratings)

1. Exceptional:	____
2. Very Good:	____
3. Satisfactory:	____
4. Marginal:	____
5. Unsatisfactory:	____
6. N/A:		____

4. ASSESSING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION

This form shall be signed by an Assessing Official with knowledge of the Contractor’s past performance. By signing below, I certify that the information provided in this form is accurate to the best my knowledge and believe it to be true and correct.

A. Organization/Agency Name:

B. Name:

C. Title:

D. Email Address:

E. Telephone Number:

F. Address:

G. Signature and Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it.