2018_Legal_Training_Evaluation_Factors.pdf

2018 EOIR Legal Training Program

EVALUATION FACTORS

Pass/Fail Factors: All of the following criteria must be met for further consideration of award. If one or more of the following requirements is not met, no further evaluation will be performed and the offer will be eliminated in its entirety. Response to this Pass/Fail factor is limited to 2 pages Times New Roman 12, equal or larger font.

Requirement Description of compliance Must be available June 10, 2018 through June 15, 2018.

(enter exact availability here)

Must be able to provide training space for 750 attendees and 475 sleeping rooms for the dates available

(enter available capacity here)

Training and lodging venues must be located within a 1/2 mile walking distance to restaurants

(enter location here)

Must have active SAM.gov registration (enter DUNS number here) Must offer lodging per diem or lower rate (state rate here) Must provide access to business services, copier, and fax

(describe business services and state any applicable restrictions)

All guests and sleeping rooms must have the same amenities.

(describe amenities)

Must be within 50 miles of 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041

(enter number of miles away from 5107 Leesburg Pike)

Once a rating of Pass is granted for each listed requirement, the following best value trade-off approach will determine a winner in descending order of importance:

Price Technical Past Performance

When combined, Technical and Past Performance will be more important than price.

Price — no page limit.

The Offeror must list all costs associated with the work described in the Statement of Work attached. Sleeping rooms will be paid separately by each attendee and therefore not be funded under this subsequent contract. The pricing structure may follow the following format and be edited further as needed:

CLIN 0001 Hotel lodging

CLIN 0002 Meeting Space CLIN 0003 Audio Visual CLIN 0004 Miscellaneous

Technical

The following evaluation factor will be used to determine the technical adjectival rating.

Response to the technical factor is limited to 10 pages inclusive of graphs and images, Times New Roman 12, equal or larger font.

Offerors must successfully demonstrate how they are able to meet all the requirements listed in the Statement of Work.

The EOIR technical evaluation team anticipates conducting a site visit to assure that the space offered by each respondent fits the need of this conference as described in the Statement of Work. Offerors should provide a point of contact for coordinating a site visit.

Past Performance

The Government will evaluate past performance by using any information available in Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and any other source of information to determine a final rating for this past performance element. Lack of past performance information will result in a rating of "Neutral".

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

A. For Technical factor:

Outstanding: Greatly exceeds the minimum performance or capability requirements in a way beneficial to the Government. There are no significant weaknesses. Those aspects of a factor or sub-factor resulting in an "Outstanding" rating may be incorporated into the resulting contract.

Excellent: Exceeds the minimum performance or capability requirements in a way beneficial to the Government. There are no significant weaknesses. Those aspects of a factor or sub-factor resulting in an "Excellent" rating may be incorporated into the resulting contract.

Acceptable: Meets the minimum performance or capability requirements. There may be minor but correctable weaknesses.

Marginal: May meet the performance or capability requirements. There are apparent or moderate weaknesses that are correctable.

Unacceptable: Fails to meet the performance or capability requirements. There are unacceptable weaknesses.

B. For Past Performance factor

UNACCEPTABLE MARGINAL Neutral ACCEPTABLE GOOD EXCELLENT Performance did not Performance did not No record of past Performance met Performance met all Performance met all meet most meet some performance or the contract contract contract contractual contractual record is in requirements. There requirements and requirements and requirements. There were serious problems and the requirements. There were problems, some of a serious conclusive, were some minor problems and corrective actions exceeded some to the government's benefit. There were exceeded many to the government's benefit. Problem, if contractor's nature, for which taken by the a few minor any were negligible correction actions corrective action contractor were problems which the and were resolved in were ineffective. was only marginally effective.

satisfactory. contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

a timely, highly effective manner.

The Government reserves the right to hold discussions if it is in the best interest of the Government and/or award without discussion.