Ceramic Plates QA.pdf
PDF 215 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rifle Resistant Ceramic Plates Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 15F06722R0000143
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amnd01.pdf | ||
| RFP Cover Ltr RFP15F06722R0000143 Ceramic Plates.pdf | ||
| 2022 Ceramic Plates RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 15F06722R0000143
BALLISTIC PROTECTIVE ARMOR
Rifle Resistant Ceramic Plates
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Posted 26 April 2022
The following questions and answers are provided for informational purposes only.
Nothing contained in the below questions and answers constitutes a change to the terms and conditions of the solicitation. Any change to a term or condition will be issued through an amendment to the solicitation. Upon review of the answers provided below, if additional clarification is needed, please forward questions to the attention of Nell Hitchye, Contracting Officer, at ELHITCHYE@fbi.gov by close of business on 28 April 2022.
Note: In some instances, questions have been abbreviated or additional context has been added to clearly describe the question for all potential Offerors.
QUESTION 1:
Is the Contractor responsible for all costs regarding payment and shipping of test plates?
ANSWER 1:
YES
QUESTION 2:
[Offeror] has ceramic plates that meets the specifications of the solicitation but are available in 10”x12” SAPI and not the requested 10”x13” SAPI size. Will the FBI accept sample plates that are 10”x12” SAPI?
ANSWER 2:
YES.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF TESTING, EXACT MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT
REQUIRED. THE FBI REQUESTED 10”X13” SAMPLE PLATES BASED ON
THE SIZE OF THE FBI’S LEGACY PLATE AND ITS ABILITY TO FIT WITHIN
THE FBI’S CARRIERS.
THE WEIGHTS AND MEASUREMENT SCORES WILL ACCOUNT FOR
SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT SIZES BY SCORING OFF OF A PER SQUARE INCH
MEASUREMENT. FOR BALLISTIC RESISTANCE TESTING, THE FBI
STRIVES FOR A FAIR COMPARISON OF ARMOR PLATES BY HAVING
EQUAL SHOT SPACING ACROSS THE MANUFACTURERS. IF SAMPLES ARE
SUBMITTED THAT ARE SMALLER, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE SHOT
SPACING WILL BE MODIFIED TO ACCOMMODATE THE DIFFERENT SIZE.
SECTION C.5.1 LISTS FOUR (4) CARRIERS THAT ARE IN USE WITHIN THE
FBI. THE MAJORITY OF THE CARRIERS IN USE ARE THE POINT BLANK
FBI TACTICAL PLATE CARRIER AND THE TYR TACTICAL EPIC FED.
BOTH HAVE AN INTERNAL SYSTEM DESIGNED TO SECURELY HOLD A
RANGE OF DIFFERENT SIZED PLATES. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE
CONTRACT WINNER HAVE PLATES AVAILABLE THAT FIT SECURELY
INTO THESE CARRIERS. UPON AWARD, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
WORK WITH THE FBI TO ENSURE A PROPER FIT IN FBI CARRIERS.
QUESTION 3:
Due to supply chain issues, we would request an extension to the solicitation.
ANSWER 3:
THE DEADLINE STANDS AS WRITTEN IN THE SOLICITAION.
QUESTION 4:
Is there a time limit between removing the sample from the conditioning chamber (hot or cold) and completing the 6-shot pattern?
ANSWER 4:
NO. THE FBI CONDITIONS THE SAMPLE ARMOR FOR A PERIOD OF TIME
BETWEEN 14 AND 24 HOURS, THEN REMOVES THE SAMPLE ITEM
IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO TESTING. IT IS THE EXPERIENCE OF THE TEST
PERSONNEL THAT THE SIX (6) TEST SHOTS ARE TYPICALLY COMPLETED
WITHIN TEN (10) MINUTES, BUT THERE IS NO SET TIME LIMIT AND THE
ARMOR WILL NOT BE RE-CONDITIONED OR RE-INSERTED INTO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHAMBER DURING TESTING.
QUESTION 5:
What is the particular lot/source for the Mild Steel Core projectile?
ANSWER 5:
THE FBI UTILIZES 123 GRAIN MILD STEEL CORE PROJECTILES MANUFACTURED
BY ARSENAL JSCO. THE PROJECTILES ARE HANDLOADED TO MEET THE
VELOCITY REQUIREMENTS STATED WITHIN THE SOLICIATION (2,380 FPS +/-
50 FPS).
QUESTION 6:
Can alternative shades (black) be used for source selection samples?
ANSWER 6:
YES. SECTION L.9 OF THE SOLICITATION (PAGES 82-83) STATES THAT, “FOR
THE PURPOSES OF THIS EVALUATION, THE FBI WILL ACCEPT SAMPLES PLATES
IN ANY COLOR.”
QUESTION 7:
The RFP states, “C.3.4 The ‘ceramic’ tile used within the plate shall not be chamfered.”
All SAPI cut plates have a chamfer on the top of the plate to allow range of motion of the arms. Also, side plates (6x6, 6x8) have chamfer relief in each corner to not have a sharp corner chafe the carrier or user. Is it the Government’s request that the edge (perimeter) of the ceramic tile not be chamfered (i.e., the ceramic has the same thickness from front to back across the entire surface), or should offerors provide a true square side plate and true rectangular torso plate?
ANSWER 7:
THE REQUIREMENT OUTLINED IN C.3.4 PERTAINS TO THE UNIFORM
THICKNESS OF THE TILE USED WITHIN THE ARMOR PLATE, NOT THE OUTLINE
OF THE PLATE AS VIEWED FROM THE STRIKE FACE. THE FBI IS NOT SEEKING
TRUE SQUARE OR TRUE RECTANGULAR PLATES. THE TAPER FOR THE SAPI CUT
IS A REQUIREMENT. ROUNDED CORNERS AND ROUNDED EDGES ON THE TORSO
AND SIDE PLATES ARE ALLOWED.
THE FBI HAS SEEN INTERNAL TILES (BORON CARBIDE, ALUMINUM OXIDE, ETC)
WITH DRASTIC CHAMFERS OR BEVELS AROUND ALL EDGES. THE FBI BELIEVES
THAT SUCH A TAPER REDUCES THE BALLISTIC PROTECTION OF THE ARMOR.
NOTE: ROUNDED EDGES AND MICRO BEVELS ARE PERMITTED.
Example of chamfered tile edge While the rounded corner is acceptable, the chamfered edges are not.
QUESTION 8:
Can the same contractor be awarded the contracts for both categories (Standard and Special Mission)?
ANSWER 8:
YES
QUESTION 9:
The Section J, Attachment 4 Data Sheets (for both the Standard and Special Mission plates) require ballistic data for “Threat Projectiles and Impact Velocities Tested Against.”
a. Is there a specific requirement for what needs to be provided with respect to this data for each projectile?
b. Is there a “pass/fail” evaluation criterion for this data sheet?
ANSWER 9:
WITHIN THE MANUFACTURER DATA SHEETS (SECTION J, ATTACHMENT
4), THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR THE THREAT PROJECTILES AND
IMPACT VELOCITIES TESTED AGAINST. THE FBI OUTLINES OUR
BALLISTIC REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION C.4.1. THE FBI ENCOURAGES
OFFERORS TO NOT SUBMIT ARMOR SAMPLES THAT CANNOT MEET
THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION M.3.4, “DATA SUBMITTED FOR VOLUME #1
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL MUST BE COMPLETE.” VOLUME #1 TECHNICAL
PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE MANUFACTURER DATA SHEETS. AS SUCH,
THE “PASS/FAIL” CRITERIA IS LIMITED TO COMPLETION OF THE DATA
SHEET.
INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL TEST DATA TO SUPPORT THE
MANUFACTURER DATA SHEET (THREAT TYPE, VELOCITY, BACKFACE
DEFORMATION, V50, ETC.) IS ALLOWED BUT NOT REQUIRED.
QUESTION 10:
Section M.3 states that Twelve torso plate samples are required in SAPI cut, size Large (~10” x 13”). We produce the SAPI Large at a 10.25” x 13.25” nominal size. Is that size acceptable for submittal purposes?
ANSWER 10:
YES. PLEASE SEE ANSWER #2 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.
QUESTION 11:
Section B.3 states that the maximum threshold for each established IDIQ shall be as follows: Standard $5,000,000 and Special Mission $2,000,000. Is this the maximum for the base year or the maximum for the base year plus four possible one-year option periods?
ANSWER 11:
THE MAXIMUM THRESHOLD OUTLINED IN SECTION B.3 SPECIFIES THE
LIFETIME MAXIMUM FOR THE CONTRACT (BASE YEAR PLUS FOUR
OPTION YEARS).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .