Attachment C. Q&A's.pdf
PDF 126 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Perimeter Detection System- FCI Safford Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 15BFA025B00000042
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file for Solicitation Number 15BFA025B00000042, specifically addressing the Replace Fire Detection System project at FCI Safford. The Q&A addresses a technical clarification submitted by Integrated Security regarding the statement of work's specification for "twisted pair lead in" cable. The government's response indicates that the "twisted pair" requirement can be disregarded if the Manufacturer of the Detection System does not require it per their own specifications, providing flexibility for potential bidders in cable selection.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bid Abstract.pdf | ||
| Attachment A. Meeting Minutes and Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| WD AZ20250025.pdf | ||
| Criminal History Check Form.pdf | ||
| Bid Bond .pdf | ||
| 15BFA025B00000042.pdf | ||
| Instruction to Bidders.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
15BFA025B00000042
Replace Fire Detection System FCI Safford
Questions submitted by: Integrated Security (1 question)
Question: The statement of work mentions "twisted pair “lead in” cable" but our lead cable has never been twisted pair. Is that something that can be ignored?
Answer: The "twisted pair" can be ignored if the Manufacture of the Detection System does not require it per their specifications.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .