AMENDMENT 0003.pdf

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

http://www.adobe.com/go/reader

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Ammendment 0003 topmostSubform[0]:

Page1[0]:

AmendmentNo[0]: 0003

Code[0]: 15BFAO

Code[1]:

AccountingData[0]:

A13[0]:

C13[0]:

D13[0]:

NameandTitleSigner[0]:

NameandTitleOfficer[0]:

Description[0]: Amendment#3 is established to incorporate the following changes:

1. Attachment 1 to correct the Schedule of items as the following for Base and all option years to:See attachment.

2.Attachment 4 to correct the Pricing Categories in descending order as follows:

1a. Inpatient Facility Services. 2a. Inpatient/Outpatient Physicians Services, 1b. Outpatient Facility Services, 2c. Optometrist 2c1. Mobile MRI, 2b.Outpatient Institutions: Other Physicians Services, see attachment.

FacilityCode[0]:

Code[2]: 15B316

IssuedBy[0]: Federal Bureau of Prisons Field Acquisition Office U.S. Armed Forces Reserve Complex 346 Marine Forces Drive Grand Prairie, TX 75051

NameandAddress[0]:

AdministeredBy[0]: Federal Correctional Institution-Williamsburg

8301 HWY 521

Salters, SC 29590

ContractIDCode[0]:

ReqNumber[0]:

AmendmentNo[1]: 15B31619R00000001

ModificationNo[0]:

ProjectNo[0]:

Page[0]:

Pages[0]:

EffectiveDate[0]: 11/20/2020

Dated9B[0]: 09/29/2020

Dated10B[0]:

CheckBox9[0]: Off

CheckBox10[0]: Off

CheckBox11[0]: 1

CheckBox13A[0]: Off

CheckBox13B[0]: Off

CheckBox13C[0]: Off

CheckBox13D[0]: Off

IsNot[0]: Off

Is[0]: 1

Extended[0]: Off

NotExtended[0]: 1

DateSigned[0]:

DateSigned[1]:

Copies[0]: 1

CopiesReturned[0]: 1

Attachment 1: Contract Pricing & Sub-Contract Certification FCI Williamsburg-Comprehensive Medical Services 15B31619R00000001

Blocks 19 through 24 – Contract Pricing and Sub-Contract Certification

Overview Services are required to be provided in accordance with the Performance Work Statement included in this solicitation/contract. Offerors are required to submit, as a part of their business proposal, a completed copy of Schedule of Items and Sub-Contract Certification.

Pricing Methodology

Except for services based on session rate, price proposals will be calculated from benchmarks utilizing Medicare reimbursement methodologies. For each category of service to be provided, Offerors will be allowed to propose a variance from the benchmark Medicare rate in the form of a discount from or a premium to Medicare rates established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The rates established in the resulting contract shall not be construed as participation in the Medicare program; contract rates will merely be equated to Medicare rates of reimbursement without reductions for deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance. When appropriate, outlier payments calculated in accordance with Medicare reimbursement methodologies shall be made in recognition of extremely costly stays. The outlier payment shall be calculated based upon the defined benchmark and will consist of the operating portion only. This structuring of the pricing methodology is not intended to be restrictive of any Offeror;

Offerors need only to propose that percentage discount from or premium to the Medicare benchmark rate which will reflect the desired level of payment for the category of services rendered. If during contract performance, it is determined that a necessary contract deliverable is not covered by Medicare reimbursement methodologies, a separate rate shall be negotiated for such deliverable(s).

Medicare Part A. The Medicare benchmark to be utilized for all services covered by Medicare Part A shall be the most current Basic MS-DRG Payment (i.e., Operating Federal Rate) established for Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) 42 South Carolina Statewide All Counties. The Basic MS-DRG calculation shall not include any provider-specific adjustments allowed under actual Medicare participation. Offerors may propose a discount from or a premium to Basic MS-DRG rates. (Refer to Attachment 5 of this solicitation)

Medicare Part B Physician Services and Non-physician Services. The Medicare benchmark to be utilized for all physician and non-physician services covered by Medicare Part B shall be those rates established in the most current Medicare Part B Fee Schedule for Payment Locality 01 South Carolina Statewide All Counties. The benchmark charges shall be those established for participating providers. Offerors may propose a discount from or a premium to the benchmark charges.

Medicare Part B Facility Services (including hospital outpatient services and ambulatory surgical centers).

The Medicare benchmark to be utilized for all facility services covered by Medicare Part B shall be the most current APC and ASC rates calculated for CBSA 42 South Carolina Statewide All Counties. Offerors may propose a discount from or a premium to the benchmark charges.

Estimated Quantities

Estimated quantities for the base year and all option years are detailed below. The estimated quantities provided are not a representation to the Offeror/Contractor that the estimated quantities will be required or ordered or that conditions affecting requirements will be stable or normal.

Inpatient and Outpatient Facility and Physician Services

Base Year – Effective Date of Award (EDOA) through twelve (12) months from EDOA.

Inpatient Days: 300 days (estimated) Outpatient Days: 265 visits (estimated)

Option Year 1 - Thirteen (13) months through twenty-four (24) months from EDOA.it

Option Year 2 - Twenty-five (25) months through thirty-six (36) months from EDOA.

Option Year 3 - Thirty-seven (37) months through forty-eight (48) months from EDOA.

Outpatient Days: 265 visits (estimated)

Option Year 4 - Forty-nine (49) months through sixty (60) months from EDOA.

Inpatient Days: 300 days (estimated) Outpatient Days: 265 visits (estimated)

Outpatient Institution Services Estimated quantities shall remain constant for the base year and all option years. For Medicare-based services, duration of visits is listed for informational purposes only, as contracted rates will be based upon the Medicare allowable per procedure performed. Mobile MRI & Optometrist shall be paid based upon the provision of defined sessions. Note: Session priced items which exceed the established session or are less than full session shall be pro-rated to the nearest quarter hour.

Cardiologist: Visit duration 4hrs. (approximate) Visit quantity 12 per contract year (estimated)

Prosthetics and Orthotics: Visit duration 4hrs. (approximate) Visit quantity 12 per contract year (estimated)

Mobile MRI: Session duration 8 hrs. (approximate) Session duration 6 per contract year (estimated)

Optometry: Session duration 6 hrs. (approximate) Session quantity 52 per contract year (estimated)

Schedule of Items

Offerors shall complete the following Schedule of Items. All proposed pricing and participation targets will be evaluated in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items, and Attachment 4, Submission and Evaluation of Proposals, of this solicitation.

Effective Date of Award (EDOA) through twelve (12) months from EDOA.

1a. Inpatient Facility Services: - ___Discount or +___ Premium to Medicare Part A 1b. Outpatient Facility Services:-___ Discount or +__ Premium to Medicare Part B 2a. Inpatient/ Outpatient Physician Services: -__ Discount or +__Premium to Medicare Part B

2b. Outpatient Institution Services: - -Other Physicians _ Discount or +__Premium to Medicare Part B

Base Year

2c. Optometry: __________ per session.

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

NOTE: IF OFFERING A VARIANCE FROM THE BENCHMARK MEDICARE RATE, INSERT

APPLICABLE "-/+" PERCENTAGE. IF NO VARIANCE, ENTER "0".

Thirteen (13) months through twenty-four (24) months from EDOA.

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

Twenty-five (25) months through thirty-six (36) months from EDOA.

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

Thirty-seven (37) months through forty-eight (48) months from EDOA.

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

Forty-nine (49) months through sixty (60) months from EDOA.

Option Year 1

Option Year 2

Option Year 3

Option Year 4

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

Sixty one (61) months through sixty (66) months from EDOA.

2c1.Mobile MRI: ________per session

All Offerors are hereby advised that the successful Offeror's unit pricing (to include discount percentage from or premium percentage to the benchmark Medicare rate) for the base year and all option years is public information, in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.503(b)(1)(iv). Accordingly, all successful unit pricing will be released to unsuccessful Offerors with the notification of award as well as to the general public when requested. Any party who objects to the release of their own unit pricing information, should they be awarded a contract in response to this solicitation, should not submit proposal in response to the solicitation.

This contract does _ does not___ provide for subcontracting possibilities. If answer is in the affirmative, Offeror will submit sub-contracting plan in accordance with the requirements of FAR 52.219-9.

Option to Extend Services as Authorized by FAR 52.217-8

Sub-Contract Certification

Blocks 19 through 24 – Contract Pricing and Sub-Contract Certification

UEstimated Quantities

Inpatient and Outpatient Facility and Physician Services

Base Year – Effective Date of Award (EDOA) through twelve (12) months from EDOA.

Option Year 1 - Thirteen (13) months through twenty-four (24) months from EDOA.it

Option Year 2 - Twenty-five (25) months through thirty-six (36) months from EDOA.

Option Year 3 - Thirty-seven (37) months through forty-eight (48) months from EDOA.

Option Year 4 - Forty-nine (49) months through sixty (60) months from EDOA.

Attachment 4: Submission and Evaluation of Proposals

FCI Williamsburg -Comprehensive Medical Services

Submission and Evaluation of Proposals

Proposals shall be submitted in three separate volumes in accordance with the following requirements.

Volume 1 - Technical Proposal Volume 2 - Past Performance Volume 3 - Business Proposal

Offerors/ are required to use the following method when submitting a proposal:

A. Electronic Proposals via e-mail. Offerors shall submit their scanned documents of Volumes 1, 2, and 3 electronically via e-mail to tsjones@bop.gov and a carbon copy (cc :) to GRA-FAO- CMS-S@bop.gov All documents must be in PDF format. All documents must be submitted and received within the inboxes of the e-mail addresses listed above by the due date and time set forth in block 8 of the Standard Form (SF) 1449, page 1 of the solicitation.

B. Offers received after the proposal deadline will be processed pursuant to FAR 52.212-1(f). It remains the Offerors responsibility to ensure ALL DOCUMENTS are in the Government's control (recipient’s in to email addresses identified in paragraph an above) by the proposal due date and time.

C. Please Note: The following applies to all electronic submissions:

a. Please refer to FAR 52.212-1(f) (2) (i) (A) (B) and (C). E-mailed proposals will not be received instantly upon transmission. Offerors must factor delivery time when submitting their proposals. As stated in paragraph B above e-mail proposals must be received within the recipient’s inbox by the proposal due date and time.

b. The Government e-mail system can only receive documents up to 10 Megabytes. Therefore, the e-mail with attachments must be less than 10MB.

D. The Offeror is responsible to ensure all electronic documents have good resolution and are LEGIBLE. The PDF file must also be text searchable.

E. Hard copies of proposals will not be accepted.

Instructions for Preparation of Technical Proposal

The Offeror's technical proposal will be an important consideration in the award of the resulting contract;

therefore, it should be specific and complete. The technical proposal shall set forth in detail an Offeror's conceptual approach to, and interpretation of the following: stated contract goals; proposed work plan for achieving contract objective; proposed methodology and techniques of performing the contract; and the technical resources, experience and background, as well as unique or specialized skills and expertise of both the Offeror and proposed subcontractors.

The Offeror's proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing straight-forward, concise delineation of capabilities to perform satisfactorily the contract being sought. The technical proposal should therefore be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

mailto:tsjones@bop.gov mailto:GRA-FAO-CMS-S@bop.gov mailto:GRA-FAO-CMS-S@bop.gov mailto:GRA/FAO-CMS%7E@bop.gov mailto:GRA/FAO-CMS%7E@bop.gov mailto:GRA/FAO-CMS%7E@bop.gov

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those sufficient to present a complete and effective response to this solicitation are not desired. Elaborate art work and expensive paper, bindings, and presentation aids are neither necessary nor wanted.

The technical evaluation criteria stated within this solicitation will be used by the technical panel in evaluating proposals; therefore, each technical proposal must contain enough specificity to address each evaluation factor and the terms and conditions of the Performance Work Statement. In order that an evaluation may be accomplished strictly on the merit of the material submitted, the technical proposal shall not make reference to pricing data. Additionally, each Offeror shall complete Attachment 8, Technical Proposal Summary Sheets by Hospital Network, and include such with the Offeror's technical proposal.

Proposals which merely paraphrase the requirements of the Government's Performance Work Statement or parts thereof or use such phrases as "will comply" or "standard techniques will be employed" and/or cut and paste information from a proposed subcontractor's website will not be acceptable. The Offeror must submit an explanation of the proposed technical approach in conjunction with the tasks to be performed in achieving the required output.

Instructions for Preparation of Past Performance Proposal

The proposal must describe the experience of the Offeror that is relevant to this contract:

a. Experience providing health care to a diverse inmate population;

b. Experience establishing and maintaining relationships with a large and diverse number of health care providers and/or organizations;

c. Experience receiving and disseminating medical records to and from multiple health care providers.

The following information shall be included in each Past Performance Proposal:

1. A list of a total of three (3) of the Offeror's most recently awarded relevant contracts with a period of performance of at least twelve (12) months. The listing shall include all items listed below:

a. Name of contracting activity;

b. Contract number;

c. Date of Award;

d. Estimated Awarded Amount;

e. Contract Performance Period;

f. Name, Mailing Address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address of the

Contracting Officer, Program Manager, and Administrative Contracting Officer;

g. Relevancy: Describe the relevance of the past of present contract to this RFP. Relevance discussion could include a comparison to providing health care to an inmate population of a similar care level as identified in Attachment 6, Medical Classification – Care Level Criteria

h. Provide any other information the Offeror deems important to understand the past performance of the contract, the Offeror’s ability to deliver quality medical services, meet schedule/performance requirements, and achieve customer satisfaction.

2. For Offerors with no past performance history, the Offeror shall state "No Past Performance History Available." In cases where an Offeror has no previous past performance or past performance information is unavailable, the Offeror will receive a neutral rating and will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably.

A Past Performance Questionnaire is provided as Attachment 9 to this solicitation. Offerors shall complete the sections entitled "Reference Identification" and "Contract Identification" and forward a copy of the entire questionnaire to be completed by the three (3) references identified above. Offerors shall advise the reference that the completed questionnaire is to be considered source selection sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104. Completed questionnaires shall be submitted as part of the Past Performance Proposal.

Any questionnaire received from an organization other than those identified in above will not be considered. In accordance with FAR 15.306, Offerors may be given an opportunity to address especially unfavorable reports of past performance, and the Offeror's response, or lack of, will be taken into consideration.

An Offeror's opportunity to address reports of negative past performance information could be affected by the Government's entitlement to award without discussions. Offerors would be well served to be aware of possible dissatisfied customers and address expected negative issues in initial proposal submissions.

Generally, negative information obtained from references provided by the Offeror are considered historical in nature, not subject to change, and not a matter for discussions.

Instructions for Preparation of Business Proposal

An Offeror's business proposal shall consist of the following information:

1. Completed Schedule of Items and Sub-Contract Certification: Attachment 1

2. Completed certification entered onto the provision 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters, and 52.209 -12 Certification Regarding Tax Matters of this solicitation.

3. Completed representations and certifications entered onto the provision at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representation and Certifications - Commercial Items." (Only if Offeror has not completed annual electronic representations and certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM) as specified at FAR 4.1201.

4. A brief explanation of the Offeror's management structure as it relates to the performance of services under the contract.

5. A reference at a financial institution with general knowledge of the Offeror's financial resources. Please include the name of the individual, name of the financial institution, address, and phone number.

6. Audited and/or certified financial statements (balance sheet, profit and loss statement) for the previous fiscal year.

Freedom of Information Act Notice

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and its amendments have resulted in an increasing number of requests from outside the Government for copies of contract proposals submitted to Federal agencies. If an Offeror's proposal contains information that he/she believes should be withheld from such requestors, under FOIA, on grounds that it is "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" [(b) (4) of the FOIA], the Offeror should identify all such information so that if the proposal is ever the subject of a FOIA request, the decision to disclose or withhold can be made promptly by the responsible Federal official.

If the Offeror considers parts of the proposal withhold able under FOIA, the following notice should be placed on the title page:

"Some parts of this document, as identified on individual pages, are considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential trade secrets or commercial or financial information not subject to mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

Material considered privileged or confidential on such grounds is contained on pages

The Offeror should mark each individual item considered privileged or confidential under the FOIA with the following notice:

"The data or information is considered confidential or privileged, and not subject to mandatory disclosure under the FOIA."

All information in the Offeror's proposal which is not designated may be subject to automatic public disclosure, if it is requested under FOIA. It must be emphasized that under FOIA no information is automatically exempt from public disclosure. However, no disclosures under FOIA will be made without a careful and exacting evaluation, giving due regard to the need for safeguarding material considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential. The Department of Justice's policy is to withhold, whenever possible, material that is genuinely privileged or confidential.

Evaluation of Proposals

Evaluation Procedures

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria set forth in this solicitation. The results of the proposal evaluation will be used to determine whether an Offeror's proposal will be considered for inclusion within the competitive range for the purpose of discussions. Offerors are hereby notified that the competitive range may be limited to the greatest number of proposals that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly-rated proposals. Offerors are also advised that a contract award may be made without discussions; therefore, the initial proposal should provide the Government with sufficient information to recommend a contract award without discussions and should reflect the Offeror's ability to perform at a reasonable price.

Technical Evaluation

The Technical Evaluation Plan will rate each Offeror's proposal against technical evaluation criteria. A technical proposal deserving of an outstanding rating shall receive a higher rating than that of a mediocre proposal, as compared to the technical evaluation criteria. The technical evaluation shall be based on the documentation which supports an Offeror's ability to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this solicitation.

Past Performance Evaluation

Offerors are advised that the Government will utilize information located in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and information obtained from the three references as well as the response from the offeror regarding experience relevant to this contract to evaluate past performance. If adequate information is available in CPARS, the Government may only use information from CPARS in the past performance evaluation. The past performance questionnaires will be used in the evaluation at the Government’s discretion.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past performance for the following:

• relevancy

• quality of services

• timeliness of deliverables/adherence to performance schedule

• cost control

• management

• utilization of small business and

• regulatory compliance

Performance information will be used for both responsibility determinations and as an evaluation factor against which offerors' ratings will be compared in the determination of best value to the Government.

Past performance will be rated and the Government's conclusions about the offeror's past performance will be considered in determining the relative merits of the offeror's proposal.

The Government reserves the right to use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the offeror. Information may be utilized from the references listed in the proposal and other relevant references known to the BOP. The Government also reserves the right to disregard a reference as non-relevant if that reference is unable to provide an informative response. The Government reserves the right to review past performance information received by the Contracting Officer following the deadline for receipt of proposals and up to the time of award.

Evaluation of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of facts and circumstances. It will not be on absolute standards of acceptable performance. By evaluating past performance, the Government intends to consider the offeror's record of conforming to specifications and to standards of good workmanship; the offeror's adherence to contract schedules, including administrative aspects of performance; the offeror's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the offeror's business-like concern for the interests of the customer. This is a matter of judgment.

Price Evaluation

An objective price evaluation and analysis will be performed on each Offeror's price proposal. Offerors are requested to submit a separate price proposal for the base period and each individual option period, as specified in this solicitation. The evaluated price will be inclusive of the base year and all option years.

Price proposals will be evaluated to determine which proposal offers the lowest price to the Government. The Offeror providing the highest discount from the Medicare rate will be considered to be offering the lowest price in each category. The Offeror proposing the highest premium to the Medicare rate will be considered to be offering the highest price in each category. Offerors must adhere strictly to the pricing methodology required by the solicitation.

Offerors who vary their pricing methodology create a situation whereby the Government cannot conduct a comparative evaluation of offers in pricing aspects. Therefore, any Offeror who proposes a pricing methodology in any pricing category which varies from the prescribed (e.g., proposing multiple rates within any category or proposing a differing methodology) will receive no pricing score for each such category.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government intends to make a single award to an Offeror, pursuant to an affirmative determination of responsibility, whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be in the best interest of the Government, price and other factors considered. In this tradeoff process, non-price factors (when combined) are approximately equal to price. Technical criteria and past performance are of equal value.

Evaluation criteria to be applied to proposals received in response to this solicitation are detailed below. Offerors are advised that should the Offeror's proposals be considered approximately the same or equal under non-price factors, price could be paramount in the selection decision.

Technical Criteria

Demonstrated approach to providing an appropriate mix of resources to deliver quality medical care to the inmates located at both the FCI Williamsburg while mitigating the Government's costs and security risks, as measured by the following sub factors, which are of equal importance:

1. Level of diversity of services proposed;

2. Driving distance and conditions to and from the community-based providers;

3. Accreditation status of the proposed contract facility(ies);

4. Enhancements to the basic contract requirements proposed by the Offeror which will facilitate FCI

Williamsburg ability to conform to the BOP's stated mission.

Past Performance Criteria

Sub factors 1 through 7 are listed below and are of equal importance.

1. Quality of services

2. Relevancy

3. Timeliness of deliverables/Adherence to performance schedule

4. Cost Control

5. Management

6. Utilization of Small Business

7. Regulatory Compliance

Price

Pricing categories are listed below in descending order of importance.

1a. Inpatient Facility Services

2a. Inpatient/Outpatient Physicians Services 1b. Outpatient Facility Services 2c. Optometry

2c1. Mobile MRI 2b.Outpatient Institutions: Other Physicians Services

A proportionate amount of points will be awarded to each Offeror below the highest-ranked offeror in each category.

Freedom of Information Act Notice

"Some parts of this document, as identified on individual pages, are considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential trade secrets or commercial or financial information not subject to mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information...

"The data or information is considered confidential or privileged, and not subject to mandatory disclosure under the FOIA."

Evaluation Procedures

Technical Evaluation