Wing_QR_Aug2017_1560-01-361-1256.pdf
PDF 189 KB Posted
- Attached to
- F-16_Wing_1560-01-361-1256_16W1030-862
- Solicitation number
- 1560-01-361-1256_March_2019
About this file
Qualification Requirement
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Wing_EDL_-1256____3-8-2019_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MANUFACTURING QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NSN: 1560‐01‐513‐2991, 1560‐01‐513‐4288, 1560‐01‐361‐1255, 1560‐01‐361‐1256, 1560‐01‐367‐ 4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728 Noun: Wing Assembly Application: F‐16
29 Aug 2017 Section C 1/7
AMSC: M (DFARS PGI 217.7506, DoD Spare Parts Breakout Program)
SECTION A: ITEM IDENTIFICATION
1. National Stock Number (NSN): 1560‐01‐513‐2991, 1560‐01‐513‐4288, 1560‐01‐361‐1255, 1560‐01‐361‐ 1256, 1560‐01‐367‐4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564
1. Part Number (P/N): 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐ 863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
2. Noun: Wing Assembly
3. Application: F‐16
SECTION B:
1. JUSTIFICATION FOR ESTABLISHING A QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT
a. Criticality: Production of this Wing Assembly requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 416 SCMS/GUEAA in order to maintain the quality of the part.
Failure to procure this Wing Assembly from a fully qualified source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the F‐16 and could cause loss of aircraft and/or crew.
b. Complexity, Manufacturing Processes, and/or Material Considerations: Inadequate control of characteristics associated with machining and processing of this Wing Assembly can result in product structural or durability degradation. Close tolerance matching of components is required. Special care and attention is required for surface finish, assembly, and sealing of this Wing Assembly to assure compliance with specified acceptance test requirements.
c. Form, Fit, Function, and Interface: The qualification requirements specified herein are necessary to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the Wing Assembly being procured.
4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
29 Aug 2017 Section C 2/7
2. REASON WHY QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT MUST BE DEMONSTRATED PRIOR TO ANY CONTRACT
AWARD
a. Completion of the specified pre‐contract award qualification requirements are necessary to assure the government that the offeror is capable of producing the Wing Assembly in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. There are significant technical and schedule risks which can only be minimized by a completion of the requirements prior to contract award.
b. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation, which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified: $47500.00.
c. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity that completion of this qualification effort should require 600 days. This is based on complexity of the Wing Assembly and other factors.
4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
29 Aug 2017 Section C 4/7
Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate
Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3) (The following categories may not apply in all cases. The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate N/A on all sections that do not apply.)
Total cost is $47,500.00
Section A. Shipping, if required, use DD Form 1654, Evaluation of Transportation Cost Factors to develop the information. Refer any questions to the Procurement Contracting Officer for cost estimation.
Section B. Dimensional/Electronic Verification. Contact the science/engineering laboratory to obtain cost estimates (bids) for tests such as:
$30,000.00
a. Chemical na
b. Metallurgical $ 0.00
(1) Destructive na
(2) Non‐Destructive na
c. Dimensional 20000
d. Electronic na
e. Mechanical na
f. Non‐Destructive Inspection 10000
Section C. Nuclear Hardness [This includes cost of shock, vibration, and Electro‐Magnetic Pulse (EMP)]. Contact Systems Engineering Integration and Test Division for hourly rate.
na
Section D. Form, Fit, Function and Interface. Contact your organizational Production Management Specialist (PMS) to obtain information on the same or similar item where work has been accomplished in the past using AFMC Form 206, Temporary Work Request.
10000
Section E. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Qualification Testing (If required) $ 0.00
a. Laboratory Costs (Costs are directly dependent on the type of testing to be accomplished and the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the depth of testing. Aircraft and missile testing will vary as the requirement dictates and the cost will have to be identified by the source of testing).
b. Flight/Data Reduction & Analysis Costs.
Section F. Travel by Contractor to Test Site (if required) $2,500.00
a. Lodging 1000
b. Per Diem 1000
c. Rental Cars 500
d. Incidentals (Verified)
Section G. SAR Package Development/Evaluation Cost: A potential new source’s development of a Source Approval (SAR) package may cost as much as:
In addition, the cost incurred for Government evaluation of their SAR may be as much as: 10000
Evaluation cost may be born by the government if it is in the best interest of the Government to qualify alternate sources.
4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
29 Aug 2017 Section C 5/7
SECTION C:
1. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE SATISFIED TO BECOME A QUALIFIED SOURCE
a. Prequalification Notice/Sources Sought: The offeror shall notify the appropriate government Small Business Office or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in the appropriate government contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Wing Assembly.
b. Facilities, Testing, and Inspection Capabilities: The offeror must certify to the government that they have, or have access to, the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, package, and store the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.
c. Data Verification: The offeror must verify that he has a complete data package. This verification must include a complete list of all procedures, drawings, and specifications, including change notices, in the offeror’s possession including, at a minimum Wing drawing and sub assemblies per the EDL. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications. Offeror must provide proof of ownership of master gauge controlled tooling required to manufacture an F‐16 wing. Contact Lockheed Martin for access to the master gauges for tooling calibration.
d. Manufacture/Process Verification: The offeror must manufacture this item to conform to the government requirements as prescribed within the ESA‐approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA‐approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by 416 SCMS/GUEAA. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes. I The offeror must also provide evidence in the form of a management process in which they will manage Critical Safety Items (CSIs) and all of the critical characteristics and critical safety processes.
e. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification: The offeror, at their own expense, shall prepare and submit to 416 SCMS/GUEAA for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements identified by wing drawings and sub assembly drawings. After completion of the approved qualification testing, the offeror shall be required to submit a complete test report of the results to 416 SCMS/GUEAA for their review and approval prior to the contract award. The government retains the right to exercise the option to inspect the testing processes, including on‐site witnessing of any or all documented testing. To
4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
29 Aug 2017 Section C 6/7 allow accomplishing this, the offeror shall notify the government at least 30 days in advance of the occurrence of any testing that will be used as a basis for qualification. The offeror’s facilities shall be made available for government inspection during these tests.
f. Qualification Article Verification: In lieu of a qualification article the government will perform extensive review of the offeror’s tooling and the tooling setup, processes and plan for wing manufacture. This may require multiple site visits at the manufacturing location at the offeror’s cost.
g. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation, which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified: $47500.00.
h. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity that completion of this qualification effort should require 600 days. This is based on complexity of the Wing Assembly and other factors.
i. Qualification Time Limitation: An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the vendor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards specified in this qualification requirement.
j. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified: The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in the qualification requirement before the date specified for award of the contract. Once all requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved source for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.
4175, 1560‐01‐514‐6565, 1560‐01‐367‐4176, 1560‐01‐514‐6564 P/N: 16W030M1‐885, 16W030M1‐886, 16W1030‐861, 16W1030‐862, 16W1030‐863,16W1030‐727, 16W1030‐864, 16W1030‐728
29 Aug 2017 Section C 7/7
2. SOURCE QUALIFICATION WAIVER REQUIREMENTS
Sources who meet any of the following source Qualification Waiver Criteria (QWC) may apply for a waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post‐contract award first article exhibit to verify production capability:
a. QWC1: The potential source submits written certification that the articles have been supplied to the government or original equipment manufacturer (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Purchase Order invoice, etc).
b. QWC2: A source qualified to provide earlier dash numbers of a basic P/N may be qualified to provide other dash numbers of that same basic P/N, provided there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other relevant requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it.