Responses_to_Solicitation_Questions_0002.pdf

PDF 132 KB Posted

Attached to
Design and Manufacture Palisades Dam Jet-Flow Gate
Solicitation number
140R1022R0009
Issued by

About this file

This document contains responses to questions from potential offerors on solicitation number 140R1022R0009 from the Bureau of Reclamation for the design, manufacture, and delivery of two 90-inch Jet-Flow Gate valves for use at the Palisades Dam in eastern Idaho. Key details include: an extension was granted to the response deadline of January 9, 2023 to allow clients time to complete Past Performance Questionnaires during holiday periods; while previously completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reports will be considered in addition to Questionnaires, they cannot substitute for the Questionnaires; and the milestone payment schedule template in the solicitation is provided as a basis for proposal but offerors are not required to use the specific terms and can propose their own financing terms in accordance with FAR 52.232-31.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Responses to Solicitation Questions

Bureau of Reclamation Palisades Dam Jet-Flow Gates

Solicitation 140R1022R0009

Q 1. Will the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) accept a previously completed Past

Performance Questionnaire(s) (PPQ) that is in the similar format as provided in

Attachment 9, and falls within the seven-year performance window?

A. Reclamation will accept previously completed PPQs which have a similar format and provide the information requested in the PPQ provided in the solicitation. In order to allow for a standardized past performance evaluation, the PPQ must provide the contract information, evaluator information, and adjectival ratings in the arrangement provided

(Outstanding, Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Poor, Not Applicable) to each of the 18 topics stated in the PPQ attached to the solicitation.

As a reminder, the addendum to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, evaluation factor two (2), Past Performance, states that “Only the previous clients/owners filling out the PPQ can submit PPQs to the Government. PPQs submitted by the offeror will not be evaluated.”

Q 2. Instead of a completed Past Performance Questionnaire, will Reclamation accept a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR)?

A. Per the addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and

Commercial Services, evaluation factor two (2), Past Performance, information obtained by the Contracting Officer from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS) will be evaluated in addition to the PPQ responses. As such, a completed CPARs cannot be substituted for PPQs.

Q 3. To give our clients ample time to complete the required Past Performance

Questionnaires during holiday observances and PTO schedules, will BUREC allow extending the deadline by an additional two-weeks?

A. A solicitation extension to 1/9/2023 is granted.

Q 4. In reference to the subject solicitation, and given the very short time allotted to prepare a proposal, we request that a 30 day extension (through the second week in

January) be provided in order to obtain the necessary PPQ responses; properly secure vendor quotes on materials and equipment; and to allow further research into Small

Business subcontracting that may support said proposal.

A. Due to the time needed to manufacture, test, and deliver the two new 90” Jet-Flow Gates and a need-by date of September 2024, we will only grant an extension to a new close date of 1/9/2023 at this time.

Q 5. In reference to Attachment 8 – Contract Financing Terms Template, the

Government indicates it will make payments to Contractor in accordance with milestones as shown in the schedule in para. a). Can the milestones in said schedule be broken down further in order to allow for a more neutral project cashflow? For example, the milestone Submittals could eventually be further broken down in accordance with Table A – List of Submittals (see Attachment 2) which indicate documentation that will be delivered at different times as the project progresses and in accordance with the Due Date/Delivery Time column.

A. The Contract Financing Terms Template is provided as a basis for offerors to propose financing terms. It is the responsibility of the offeror to propose financing terms, if required, in accordance with FAR 52.232-31 and the contract financing evaluation factor.

The offeror is not required to use the template provided or any of the specific terms or language therein.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .