SECTION M.3 Evaluation factors for award_0001.pdf

Tidal Zone Asphalt and Debris Cleanup Project

PROPOSAL EVALUATION of FACTORS 1-2

Gulf Islands National Seashore Solicitation Number

DATE:

EVALUATOR:

OFFEROR:

OVERALL RATING:

Ratings of “Exceptional”, “Good”, and “Marginal” are all considered ACCEPTABLE

A rating of UNACCEPTABLE on any individual Factor or Subfactor will cause the OVERALL

RATING of the proposal to be rated UNACCEPTABLE. *

*IF THE PROPOSAL WAS RATED UNACCEPTABLE, PLEASE SUMMARIZE REASONS:

A 20-minute Oral Presentation conducted via telephone conference call or Microsoft Teams to clarify the bidder's written proposal will be required from each bidder with an OVERALL RATING of “Good” or better.

Signature of Evaluator:

1. PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Project experience demonstrating:

(A) Capability to successfully complete relevant projects of similar scope and magnitude as demonstrated in the proposal narrative and, if available, by past performance reports. (Exceptional / Good/ Marginal / Unacceptable)

(B) Necessary equipment. Includes an excavator with at least 20' reach (especially for removing submerged debris), a piece of equipment (e.g. front-end loader or skidsteer) to remove debris from unsubmerged areas, slotted attachments or some other way of sifting/removing sand before the load gets dumped, and a piece of equipment that the excavator can empty debris into that can then run to the staging/sorting lot. All equipment should be capable of operating in soft sand. Bidders that do not have access to equipment meeting the above specifications will be rated Unacceptable. (Acceptable / Unacceptable)

(C) Adequate personnel, organization, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills. Proposals the have less than two personnel onsite at a time will be rated Unacceptable. (Exceptional / Good / Marginal / Unacceptable)

(D) Effective management, problem solving, communication, coordination, and organization present lower levels of risk and will be more favorably rated. Those not demonstrating these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be rated less favorably. (Exceptional / Good / Marginal / Unacceptable)

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESSES

2. TECHNICAL APPROACH & SCHEDULE

SUBFACTOR 2A -- TECHNICAL APPROACH: Technical approaches that are appropriate, and efficient; and demonstrate clear logic and scope understanding present lower levels of risk and will be rated more favorably. Approaches not demonstrating these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be rated less favorably. Approaches that do not comply with contract requirements will be rated Unacceptable. (Exceptional / Good / Marginal / Unacceptable)

SUBFACTOR 2B -- SCHEDULE: Proposed Construction schedules that indicate a clear and efficient critical path and logical sequencing, account for procurement lead-time, any subcontractor/trade coordination, on-site storage and staging, and resource and time constraints within the Period of Performance will be deemed acceptable. Proposed schedules unable to account for all the aforementioned factors within the Period of Performance will be rated unacceptable. (Acceptable / Unacceptable)

STRENGTHS

WEAKNESSES