1510-56_PRE-BID_TOUR_Bayhorse_Site_Repairs_0001.doc
DOC document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GAOA - BAYHORSE RECREATION SITE REPAIRS
- Solicitation number
- 140L2625R0003
About this file
This document is a Pre-Bid Tour/Site Inspection Record for the Bayhorse Recreation Site Repairs project, solicitation number 140L2625R0003, issued by the Bureau of Land Management. The project involves comprehensive recreation site repairs, including irrigation system redesign, roadway improvements, fencing replacement, and site infrastructure upgrades. Key project parameters include a 180-calendar day performance period with a construction window from August 18, 2025 to November 15, 2025, and specific requirements such as reinstalling existing gates, reusing parking stops, and managing irrigation systems with a 7 gpm flow rate and a watering window between midnight and 4am.
The pre-bid conference was conducted on 06/25/2025 by BLM representatives Jerry Burrows, Nikki Smith, and Matthew Moen, with two potential contractors in attendance: Richard Keate from Vanguard LLC and Tom Lowery from Adapt Construction. The document contains 24 detailed questions and answers covering technical specifics like irrigation system design, water pipe placement, roadway gravel depth, site disturbance limits, and equipment reuse. Notable requirements include using galvanized steel pipes, matching existing road profiles, removing large boulders, and ensuring proper water system burial depths (2 feet for irrigation, 3 feet for potable water).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bayhorse_Specifications_Amend-1_0001.pdf | ||
| Bayhorse_Drawings_Amend-1_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L2625R0003_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Bayhorse_Specifications_Final.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L2625R0003.pdf | ||
| SF-24_Bid_Bond.pdf | ||
| Bayhorse_Drawings_Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1Form 1510-56
(December 1985)
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
SITE INSPECTION TOUR / PREBID CONFERENCE RECORD TC \l1 "
| 1. Solicitation No. :140L2625R0003 |
| 4. Meeting Place: BAYHORSE RECREATION SITE (PROJECT LOCATION) |
| 2. Title: GAOA – BAYHORSE RECREATION SITE REPAIRS |
| 5. Conducted by: JERRY BURROWS/NIKKI SMITH/MATTHEW MOEN |
3. Date and Time: 06/25/2025, 11:00A.M.
7. Attended By: (Attach Separate Sheet, if Necessary)
| Name and Firm |
| Address (include zip code) |
| Phone No. |
(include area code)
RICHARD KEATE
VANGUARD LLC
1059 E 2700 N
MONTEVIEW, ID 83435
208-339-2167
TOM LOWERY
ADAPT CONSTRUCTION
598 REDWOOD RD
SARATOGA SPRINGS, UT 84045
801-259-0584
8. Questions asked, and responses given: (Use Reverse if necessary)
Q1: Is the irrigation system considered a “design build”?
A1: Yes, See drawing sheet C110: Irrigation Notes.
Q2: Is it up to the contractor to locate and remove all of the old irrigation system?
A2: See drawing sheet CD102: Sheet Keynote 1.
Q3: Does the contractor need to dig under the pumphouse to replace the hardware that goes through the existing concrete pad located in the pumphouse? Also, does all of the hardware that currently goes through the pumphouse concrete pad need to be replaced?
A3: See drawing sheet CD200: Sheet Keynote 2.
Q4: The current drawings that have been provided show that the backflow preventer is located on the potable water side of the water system rather than the irrigation side. Is this where BLM wants the backflow preventer placed?
A4: See amended drawing sheet C502 – C3.
Q5: Does the contractor have to use galvanized steel pipe in pump house?
A5: Yes, see specification section 221116 – Pipe and Fittings 2.2.C Q6: What is the current gravel depth of the site road? Also, is there existing cloth under the gravel?
A6: The gravel depth of the existing roadway is unknown. See amended drawing sheet C500: D4. The camping spurs have exposed existing geotextile while the roadway does not.
Q7: The current drawings do not show a gate as part of the fence. Is the contractor expected to re-hang the existing gate along the new fence? Or will it be eliminated?
A7: Yes, the contractor shall re-install existing gate. See amended drawing sheet C120: Sheet Keynotes 4.
Q8: Are the parking stops that are existing going to be salvaged?
A8: Yes, all of the parking stops that exist within the site will be re-used.
Q9: Is it up to the contractor to dispose of the large boulders that are placed around the site?
A9: Drawing CD100 sheet keynotes 5 – Remove existing large boulders, typical of 37.
Q10: Does BLM have a location that the contractor is expected to take the excess materials brought to?
A10: No, the contractor shall be responsible for legal disposal of excess materials.
Q11: There is no survey data included for the site road – does this mean that the road profile is “match existing?”
A11: Yes, the new road profile shall the match existing roadway profile.
Q12: The existing 1-rail fence near camping units will be removed, but do the numbered site posts also get removed?
A12: The numbered site posts that designate the camping units shall remain.
Q13: Is the irrigation water system expected to be buried 2 feet below ground level and the potable water system expected to be buried 3 feet below ground level?
A13: Yes, Irrigation – See specification section 328400 – 3.1.D.1 Execution (PG 77)
Potable Water – See drawing sheet C500 – A4.
Q14: Are there any LOD (limits of disturbance) locations and where are they?
A14: Yes, from the northwest side of the boat ramp to the southeast will remain undisturbed.
Q15: Will the site be closed for construction?
A15: BLM will work with the contractor on site closure.
Q16: Is there a linear footage given for the fence?
A16: Contractor will field verify all quantities in a lump sum and submit their schedule of values to BLM. Demolish quantities are as follows: Drawing CD102 sheet keynote 4 – 3-rail fencing, typical of 1,200 LF. Drawing CD102 sheet keynote 3 – 1-rail fencing, typical of 27 locations.
Q17: There are old cattleguard concrete bases located at this site – will these need to be removed?
A17: No, these do not need to be removed.
Q18: Is there an existing irrigation system on site?
A18: Yes.
Q19: What is the period of performance?
A19: 180 calendar days from Notice to Proceed (NTP). On site construction window: August 18, 2025 – November 15, 2025.
Q20: What does the turf maintenance detail?
A20: See amended specification section 329200 – 3.4 Turf Maintenance.
Q21: Will campsites #12 and #13 (located east of the boat ramp) be included in the roadwork?
A21: No, campsites #12 and #13 are not included in the roadwork. See drawing sheets C120 and C121.
Q22: Pertaining to the 1 – rail fence detail on sheet C501. Would it be acceptable to change the rail sizing from 4.5” to 3.5”?
A22: Yes, the replacement of the 1 – rail fence 4.5” rail with a 3.5” rail is acceptable.
Q23: Does the irrigation system need to stamped by an engineer or architect?
A23: No, the planting irrigation system does not need engineer or architect stamped drawings. See specification section 328400 – 1.2.C Action Submittals.
Q24: Can we confirm that the planting irrigation system flow rate is 7 gpm and the irrigation window is 28 hours per week?
A24: Yes, the irrigation flow rate is limited to 7 gpm (See drawing sheet C110 Irrigation Notes: 1 & 2). Yes, the irrigation watering window is typically between the hours of midnight and 4am (See drawing sheet C110 Irrigation Notes: 3).
9. Was a complete site inspection made? Yes No. (If “No,” explain)
| By (Name) |
| Title |
| Date |
| JERRY BURROWS |
| CIVIL ENGINEER (PROJECT COR) |
| 06/25/2025 |
CONTRACTION OFFICER
COR
PI
COPY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .