Sabinoso_Gravel_Pit_Run_Evaluation_Criteria_0001.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TFO SABINOSO WILDERNESS PIT RUN GRAVEL
- Solicitation number
- 140L2222Q0020
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sabinoso_Pit_Run_Gravel_Contract_Site_Map_(1)_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L2222Q0020_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L2222Q0020_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sabinoso_Gravel_Pit_Run_Evaluatin_Criteria_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sabinoso_Pit_Run_Gravel_Spec_0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Sol_140L2222Q0020.pdf | ||
| Sabinoso_Pit_Run_Gravel_Spec.doc | DOC document | |
| Sabinoso_Gravel_Pit_Run_Evaluatin_Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sabinoso_Pit_Run_Gravel_Location_Map.pdf | ||
| Sabinoso_Pit_Run_Gravel_Bid_Schedule.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TAOS FIELD OFFICE
SABINOSO GRAVEL PIT RUN SUPPLY
52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items. (OCT 2014)
The Government intends to award the contract to a responsible party whose proposal is responsive to the solicitation process for Sabinoso Gravel Pit Run Supply and provides “Best Value to the Government” on a Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis.
A Technical Evaluation Panel consisting of no less than three members will conduct the initial evaluation. Upon completion of the evaluation period, the panel will review each proposal and make their final award recommendation to the Contracting Officer. Provide your bid in two separate volumes:
Volume 1 – Pricing.
Volume 2 – Non-pricing, which includes information of evaluation factors.
The following factors and sub-factors will be used to determine technical acceptability:
Factor #1 -Technical Capability of Item Offered
Subfactor #1 – Ability of Item to Meet Required Specifications - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offer must at a minimum, demonstrate adequate technical capability of the item offered to meet or exceed the item specifications.
Subfactor #2—Ability to Meet Delivery Schedule - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offeror shall provide a schedule for delivery that meets the desired delivery date.
Factor #2 -Past Performance
Subfactor #1- Recency and relevancy of present/past performance in relation to this effort - To receive a rating of “acceptable” for this subfactor, offeror must, at a minimum provide past experience on similar type contract(s). The past experience should indicate successes of the contractor in completing/meeting delivery dates and customer satisfaction.
The Government considers “recent” present/past performance to be within the past 5 years.
The Government considers “relevant” present/past performance to be present/past performance effort involved in similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Factor # 3 -PRICE: Award will be made to the lowest priced offeror that is evaluated as “acceptable” for all non-price factors.
All non-price factors, when combined, are approximately equal in importance to cost or price.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .