Sol_140L1723Q0050.pdf

140L1723Q0050

1. REQUEST NO.

5a. ISSUED BY

NAME

a. NAME

c. STREET ADDRESS

d. CITY

10. PLEASE FURNISH QUOTATIONS TO

THE ISSUING OFFICE IN BLOCK 5a ON

OR BEFORE CLOSE OF BUSINESS (Date)

2. DATE ISSUED 3. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 4. CERT. FOR NAT. DEF.

UNDER BDSA REG. 2

AND/OR DMS REG.1

RATING

6. DELIVERY BY (Date)

7. DELIVERY

9. DESTINATION

a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE

b. STREET ADDRESS

PAGE OF PAGES

5b. FOR INFORMATION CALL: (No collect calls)

TELEPHONE NUMBER

AREA CODE NUMBER

8. TO:

b. COMPANY

e. STATE f. ZIP CODE

c. CITY

d. STATE e. ZIP CODE

IMPORTANT: This is a request for information, and quotations furnished are not offers. If you are unable to quote, please so indicate on this form and return it to the address in Block 5a. This request does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of the submission of this quotation or to contract for supplies or services. Supplies are of domestic origin unless otherwise indicated by quoter. Any representations and/or certifications attached to this Request for Quotations must be completed by the quoter.

11. SCHEDULE (Include applicable Federal, State and local taxes)

THIS RFQ

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION

(THIS IS NOT AN ORDER)

IS IS NOT A SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDEX

08/21/2023 0040634285

1 3

Denver Federal Center Building 40 Lakewood CO 80225

COLORADO STATE OFF

06/30/2024

BLM-CO WHITE RIVER FIELD OFFICE

220 E MARKET STREET

MEEKER

CO 81641

303 239-3637Courtni Strickland

09/11/2023 1700 MD

FOB DESTINATION

OTHER

(See Schedule)X

ITEM NO.

(a)

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(b)

QUANTITY

(c)

UNIT

(d)

UNIT PRICE

(e)

AMOUNT

(f)

BLM-CO- WRFO SPRING GULTCH 1-22 AIR QUALITY

MONITORING

This modification is to extend the offer date to September 11, 2023, 1700 MT.

This is a solicitation for methane air quality monitoring at Spring Gulch in accordance with the terms and conditions of your Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Federal Orphaned Well Program Support Services IDIQ and the attachments.

Basis for Award: Lowest Price Technically Continued ...

12. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

a. 10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) b. 20 CALENDAR DAYS (%) c. 30 CALENDAR DAYS (%) d. CALENDAR DAYS

NUMBER PERCENTAGE

NOTE: Additional provisions and representations

13. NAME AND ADDRESS OF QUOTER

b. STREET ADDRESS

c. COUNTY

d. CITY e. STATE f. ZIP CODE

14. SIGNATURE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

SIGN QUOTATION

16. SIGNER

a. NAME (Type or print)

c. TITLE (Type or print)

a. NAME OF QUOTER

AREA CODE

NUMBER

15. DATE OF QUOTATION

b. TELEPHONE are are not attached

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

Previous edition not usable

STANDARD FORM 18 (REV. 6-95)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.215-1(a)

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 3

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

140L1723Q0050

Acceptable

This award will be made based off of Lowest-Price

Technically Acceptable (LPTA) as detailed in FAR

15.101-2. The LPTA process is a simplified best value source selection strategy that permits the best value to result from the selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price. While evaluating quotes utilizing LPTA, price and technical are the two evaluation factors. Price and Technical Acceptability when evaluated are weighted equally.

If the lowest priced evaluated is considered a technically acceptable offer that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point.

Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not considered technically acceptable, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is determined to be technically acceptable or until all offerors are evaluated. The Contracting

Officer shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

Evaluation Factors

Evaluation Approach.

Price Reasonableness Evaluation. The offeror¿s

Price Quote will be evaluated based upon the total price proposed. Price will be ranked from lowest to highest price.

Technical Qualifications. Technical submissions will be evaluated utilizing as shown below.

Acceptable Information provided demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Information provided does not demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Vendor Responsibility. Federal Databases such as

FAPIIS/CPARS will be utilized. Information recorded in FAPIIS and SAM and will be used to determine a contractor¿s responsibility.

The evaluation process shall proceed as follows.

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

3 3

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

140L1723Q0050

Step 1 ¿ Rank all proposals by price and evaluate price reasonableness from lowest price to highest price.

Step 2 ¿ Evaluate the lowest-priced proposal for technical acceptability. The technical portion of the quote will be rated based on the table below as either ¿acceptable¿ or ¿unacceptable¿.

Step 3 ¿ Determine the responsibility of the vendor.

Period of Performance: 09/15/2023 to 06/30/2024

00010 Methane Monitoring on Spring Gulch 1-22

Product/Service Code: F999

Product/Service Description: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES

Delivery: 06/30/2024

All invoices must be submitted directly to www.ipp.gov and include a matching invoice attachment, certification for progress payments, certified payroll and for the final invoice a release of claims.

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)