Attachment_1_Curriculum_Statement_of_Work_rev_1.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SECONDARY EDUCATION CURRICULUM-CRITICAL MINERALS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140G0124Q0143
About this file
This document contains a Performance-Based Work Statement and a related Federal Contract Opportunity for a secondary education curriculum package focusing on critical minerals.
The Performance-Based Work Statement outlines the background, scope, and requirements for the curriculum development. The curriculum aims to raise awareness and understanding among middle and high school students about the importance of critical minerals, including their science, technology, career opportunities, and global impact. The contractor is required to develop various deliverables such as hands-on activity modules, videos, science fair project guides, teacher training webinars, and activities for informal science audiences. The work process involves a pilot test, field test, and final delivery of the curriculum modules.
The related Federal Contract Opportunity is a sources sought market survey to gather information on industry's interest, capabilities, and qualifications for this project. It includes specific questions for respondents regarding the Performance Work Statement, pricing structure, company capabilities, and the project timeline. The opportunity is for market research purposes only and is not a solicitation for quotes.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE-BASED WORK STATEMENT
Introduction The United States Geological Survey (USGS), National Minerals Information Center is requesting bids to create a secondary education curriculum package focusing on critical minerals.
Background The goal of the curriculum is to raise awareness in middle and high school students (and their teachers and parents) about the importance of critical minerals in their lives, and to provide them with an understanding of the science, technology, career opportunities, and global impact of the human need for critical minerals. This was recently the subject of a lengthy discussion at a seminar at the National Academies of Sciences
Definitions/Applicable documents The science of rocks and minerals is included in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) at both the middle and high school levels (https://www.nextgenscience.org/, accessed 03/20/2024). The topics are also assessed in the Advanced Placement Environmental Science test (https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/ap-environmental-science-course-and-exam-description.pdf accessed 03/20/24) These are important drivers in what science subject matter is taught in schools. Although states each have their own science standards, their standards are typically aligned with national standards and assessments. Most states teach the Earth sciences in grades six and nine, which is why the focus of this proposal is at the secondary level.
Resources for curriculum development include USGS publications A World of Minerals in Your Mobile (General Information Product 167) and The The Rare-Earth Elements-Vital to Modern Technologies and Lifestyles (Fact Sheet 2014 – 3078).
Scope One strategy for engaging students quickly in STEM topics is to start with familiar objects. For a critical minerals curriculum, for example, one might start with the materials that go into a smart phone. Initial questions could be: What are these materials? How is it that these materials were selected? What properties do the materials have? Why do they have these properties? Where did the materials come from and how did they form? How did people find out that these materials were there? Why are some materials found in abundance in certain places in the world and not in others?
Essentially, the instructional strategy of putting the study of critical minerals in a real world context (cell phone) provides the teacher with the platform for the study of minerals in general: What minerals are; how they and their properties are identified; how they form; where they are found and how; how they are extracted and processed; what they are worth; what jobs, skills, and knowledge are involved in all of this; what the roles of federal, state and local governments are in critical minerals; what the risks are of not having enough; and are there any substitutes? The study of the critical minerals that make up a cell phone can act as a template for studying other objects and the critical minerals used in them (computers, solar panels, electric vehicles, etc.)
The teacher can lead the investigation into the cell phone minerals, but, after the template for investigation is established, students can then divide into specialist teams to explore other objects and the critical minerals that make them up. An alternative strategy could be to have student teams focus on one critical mineral and develop a presentation for their classmates (PowerPoint, video, play, poster, web page, etc.) They would also be asked to develop a fact sheet or web page for their peers (or for their parents or younger students) including their sources and links to those sources. Student teams would be asked to find information from reliable sources on their mineral: Its chemistry, properties, source, extraction, processing, uses, rarity, careers involved, etc. Materials kits could also be a part of the curriculum, so that students can study the properties of minerals and learn how to identify them.
The curriculum modules developed for the formal educational audience can then be adapted for an informal audience.
Work Requirements Deliverables The USGS requires the Contractor to submit all results electronically in addition to prepared slides. These deliverables include:
· Drop-in hands-on activity/content/assessment modules on critical minerals that can be enhancements to schools’ existing science/technology/engineering/mathematics (STEM) curricula.
· Links to critical minerals videos from the USGS and other reliable sources.
· Science fair project guide on critical minerals.
· Webinars to prepare teachers to implement the modules.
· Set of activities on critical minerals suitable for an informal science audience (rocks and minerals clubs, scouts, boys and girls clubs, 4-H)
· National competition (along the lines of the National Science Bowl) for projects focusing on critical minerals.
Curriculum Development Process All effective curricula start with identifying outcomes such as what students should know and be able to do by the time they complete the curriculum.
These outcomes can include (among others):
· increased science knowledge
· facility in applying science processes (observing, recording, predicting, formulating hypotheses, designing experiments, collecting, and analyzing data, arriving at evidence-based conclusions, etc.)
· development of laboratory skills
Project Timeline
| Activity |
| Week(s) from Contract Award |
| Notes |
| Contract award |
| Week 1 |
| Kick-off meeting with contract recipient, USGS staff, and external evaluator |
| Week 2 |
| This can be virtual or hybrid. |
| Draft outline for both modules |
| Week 3 |
| This will be submitted to USGS staff for review. |
| Identification of pilot teachers by contractor |
| Week 4 |
| We will need a small group of pilot teachers (5/module) for the initial test once the pilot version is complete. Teachers will be selected to represent a wide geographic distribution, as well as urban, rural, and suburban settings. |
| Return of reviewed outline from USGS to contract recipient |
| Week 5 |
| Completion of draft modules for both levels (grades 6 and 9) |
| Week 6 |
| Review of draft modules by USGS |
| Week 7 |
| Completion of pilot modules by contract recipient |
| Week 8 |
| The delivery of the draft modules will depend on the extent of changes/revisions required by USGS. |
| Training of 10 pilot teachers by contractor |
| Week 9 |
| The training will be virtual or hybrid. |
| Pilot Test and evaluation by USGS |
| Week 10 |
| Identification of field test teachers |
| Weeks 11-12 |
| The field test teacher group should be larger than the pilot group, but can include the pilot teachers. |
| Post-pilot meeting with USGS, evaluator, grant recipient, and pilot teachers |
| Week 13 |
| This will be a virtual meeting to de-brief on the pilot. |
| Delivery of Field-test version of the modules |
| Week 14 |
| The time to delivery will depend on the extent of the revisions resulting from the pilot. |
| Review of Field-test version by USGS |
| Week 15 |
| Delivery of final Field-test version |
| Week 16 |
| Training of Field test teachers |
| Week 16 |
| This will be virtual. |
| Field test and evaluation |
| Weeks 17 |
| Post Field-test revisions |
| Weeks 18-19 |
| Again, the revision time will depend on the results of the field test and evaluation |
| Delivery of final modules |
| Weeks 20-21 |
| Post-project Meeting (grant recipient, evaluator, USGS staff, possibly a subset of teachers) |
| Week 22 |
| Virtual meeting. |
| Launch of modules on the USGS website |
| Week 23 |
| The launch will include publicity to such entities as the USGS, National Science Teachers Association, National Association of Geoscience Teachers, National and State Earth Science Teachers Associations, National Association of Science Supervisors, Mineralogical Society of America, and others. |
Supporting Information Place of Performance – Location of Contractor’s facility.
Government Furnished Property (GFP) – N/A Special Considerations. – N/A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .