B26_SQA_26Q0399-A1_(FINAL)_0001.pdf
PDF 157 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Appraisal Services: AVSO - Cantwell, Alaska (CWL_2 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140D0426Q0399
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers amendment attachment for federal contract solicitation 140D0426Q0399. The document addresses clarifications regarding property appraisal scope and methodology for 11 individual lots (Lots 1A through 1J and Lot 2), totaling approximately 116.19 acres. The government confirmed that the appraisal encompasses all lots on both the southeast and northwest sides of a river, with map labels adjusted to eliminate duplicates.
The government response clarifies that each lot should be appraised individually for retail values based on its specific attributes, such as water frontage, rather than using a bulk subdivision or yield capitalization approach. Regarding improvements, the government directed that lots be appraised as if vacant, with any existing improvements identified and recorded but excluded from the valuation conclusion. The use of a hypothetical condition is approved if needed. These clarifications address contractor questions about inspection methodologies, data requirements for different lot types, and the treatment of improvements in the appraisal process.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140D0426Q0399_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140D0426Q0399.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment Attachment 001 Questions and Answers
Solicitation – 140D0426Q0399
Question No. Question Government Response
1 Question Context: Page 2 of the SOW shows 116.19 acres, more or less, but the exhibit seems to point to Lot 1E – 4.87 acres..
Question: Please confirm that the property appraised is all 10 lots on the southeast side of the river and the larger tract (Lot 1) on the northwest.
The map labels were set to remove duplicates. This request is to appraise Lots 1A thru 1J and Lot 2. 11 individual lots.
2 Question Context: Page 2 of the SOW shows 116.19 acres, more or less, but the exhibit seems to point to Lot 1E – 4.87 acres.
Question: Please confirm that the property appraised is all 10 lots on the southeast side of the river and the larger tract (Lot 1) on the northwest.
The map labels were set to remove duplicates. This request is to appraise Lots 1A thru 1J and Lot 2. 11 individual lots.
3 Question Context: If that is the case, an aerial overflight is the best way to inspect all the properties.
But substantial improvements, if any, would require an on-site inspection. Overland access is complicated by the surface conditions – particularly if there are substantial improvements on the lot (2) across the river. So, the nature of the improvements is important.
Question A: If all the lots are to be appraised are you just looking for individual retail values – or a bulk value measured by a subdivision approach (yield capitalization)?
Question B: If all the lots are to be appraised, it will require different data sets to account for waterfront and set-back lots?
See question 4 regarding improvements.
The lots should be appraised for individual retail values.
Each lot should be valued based on its individual attributes, e.g.
water frontage, etc.
4 Question: As the request (RFQ) indicates improvements are to be included and appraised, is any information available as to the type or extent of improvements on the property? I could not verify the improvements through publicly available sources, such as review of the existing survey, plat, or aerial imagery.
Upon further review, lots should be appraised as if vacant. If any improvements are found, identify those and record their presence, to not be misleading. They should not be part of the valuation conclusion. However, this contract is to appraise the subject as if vacant and the use of a hypothetical condition is approved, if needed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .