B08_SOL_Attachment_2_-_PPQ_0001.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Statistical Production Modernization Support for B Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140D0423R0022
About this file
This document contains a past/present performance questionnaire template for a federal solicitation seeking statistical production modernization support services. The questionnaire is to be completed by a customer evaluator and submitted by April 19, 2023 to assess a contractor's performance on an existing contract. Areas to be evaluated include quality, program management, cost control, and strengths/weaknesses. The related solicitation seeks ongoing maintenance and enhancement support for existing modernization systems as well as development of new systems to support the Bureau of Economic Analysis' Office of the Chief Information Officer. The services are for the Department of the Interior Departmental Offices Interior Business Center.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140D0423R0022_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140D0423R0022_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_4_-_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08_SOL_Attachment_7__-_Pricing_Template_(1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08_SOL_Attachment_6_-_BEA_NDA_(1).pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_3_-_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_140D0423R0022.pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_5_-_Release_of_Claims.pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_2_-_PPQ.pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_1_-_Modernization_SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Document No.
140D0423R0022 Document Title BEA Statistical Production Modernization Support for the BEA-EITS
ATTACHMENT 2 - PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ____________________________________________________________________
B. Contract number: _______________________________________
C. Contract type: ______________________________
D. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
E. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
F. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
G. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
H. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
I. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name and title:
B. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
C. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Note |
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter). |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters). |
| Quality of Product or Service |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements
Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program
Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
| Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations
Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
| Transition/Phase-in & Employee Retention/Attraction |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
| Cost Control |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire no later than 2PM current Eastern Time April 19, 2023 by submitting to:
Email Address: christopher_bothwell@ibc.doi.gov and nicole_gregory@ibc.doi.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .