Attachment_3_TORFP_Questions_and_Answers_Log_592024_0001.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FENCE - NENAHNEZAD COMMUNITY SCHOOL
- Solicitation number
- 140A2324R0059
About this file
The document provided is a Questions and Answers Log for Task Order Request for Proposal (TORFP) #140A2324R0059 for the "FENCE - NENAHNEZAD COMMUNITY SCHOOL" federal contract opportunity. The contract is being issued by the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Indian Education.
The key details from the Q&A log include:
- There are discrepancies between the stated length of fencing in the Statement of Work (539 linear feet) and the length measured during the site visit (2,104 linear feet). The agency clarifies that the bidders should follow the map attached to the Statement of Work.
- The agency confirms that a survey of the existing fence is required as a visual confirmation of the condition of the equipment and materials.
- The agency clarifies that the existing fencing must be disposed of per the Statement of Work, despite previous verbal instructions to keep it.
- The agency confirms that a payment bond is required as one of two payment protections for this contract.
- The agency provides the missing map attachment referenced in the Statement of Work.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 Questions and Answers Log for Task Order Request for Proposal # 140A2324R0059 Fence
| Number | Date Received | Contractor | Question | Date Sent to COR | Answer | Date Answered |
| 1 | 5/8/24 | Zohnnie Construction | The written sow states 539 lf of fence to be installed but at the site visit we were told to mesure out 2,104 lf. What measurement do we bid on 539lf. or 2,104 lf. | 5/8/24 | Follow the map that I attached to the SOW. | 5/9/24 |
| 2 | 5/8/24 | Zohnnie Construction | On the Sow It asks for a survey to be done on the pre-existing fence? Was this an error or do you really want to have the existing fenceline Surveyed? | 5/8/24 | The original SOW indicated a removel and haul off. This might be a visual confirmation of the equipment and materials if any is in good shape. | 5/9/24 |
| 3 | 5/8/24 | Zohnnie Construction | At the jobwalk the staff told us that they wanted to keep old fencing. The SOW states to dispose of it? Which do we do? Leave at school or take to land fill (this decision effects disposal fees) | 5/8/24 | Dispose as on the SOW. | 5/9/24 |
| 4 | 5/8/24 | Zohnnie Construction | Just checking if bonding is or is not required for the fence bid? | 5/8/24 | The CO requires a minimum of two payment protections: A payment bond; an irreovocable letter of credit (ILC); a tripartite escrow agreement; certificatses of deposit; and/or a deposit of the types of security listed in FAR 28.204-1. FOR MORE INFO SEE FAR 28.102-1. Yes this requirment requies a payment bond. If the vendor selects that to be one of the two payment protections. | 5/9/24 |
| 5 | 5/10/24 | Zohnnie Construction | Im sorry there is no Map with Fence SOW? I went to FBO and did not fine a map or drawing. Please provide indicated map to make sure we are on the same page | 5/10/24 | Attachment 5 of School Map added | 5/10/24 |
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .