Brand_Name_Justification_Redacted_0001.pdf
PDF 972 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Servers for NIDS Modernization Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140A1625Q0022
About this file
This is a Brand Name Only Justification for the NIDS Modernization requirement (PR #44000241) from the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Information Technology (OIT), Division of Information Security. The justification supports the sole-source procurement of Security Onion products, citing FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) as the authority for other than full and open competition.
The DIS Security Engineering team determined that Security Onion is the only product that meets the netflow monitoring requirements specified in M 21-31 and integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure and C2 systems. While the products are classified as Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items, market research identified 1556 possible ISBEE sources under NAICS 541519, with one vendor (Regency Consulting) already expressing formal interest. The procurement will be a firm-fixed price contract solicited directly to Indian Small Business Economic Enterprises (ISBEEs) via SAM.gov. The contracting officer determined pricing will be fair and reasonable based on competitive quotes, commercial price lists, and IGE comparison from qualifying ISBEE vendors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140A1625Q0022_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140A1625Q0022.pdf | ||
| B08_IA_-_IEE_Representation_Form.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
7. A determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.
I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable. This determination is based on the following:
8. A description of the market research conducted (see Part 10) and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.
9. Any other facts supporting the use of justification of other than full and open competition, such as:
10. A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.
11. A statement of any actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required.
Originating Office Attestation:
I certify that the technical data which forms a basis for this justification is complete and accurate and meets the Government’s minimum needs.
12. Contracting Officer certification that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of the contracting officer’s knowledge and belief:
I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .