Sol_140A0525Q0005_Amd_0001.pdf
PDF 152 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140A0525Q0005
About this file
This file is Amendment 0001 to RFQ #140A0525Q0005 for a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment in Ouzinkie, Alaska, along with associated questions and answers. The amendment extends the quote due date to February 5, 2025 at 12:00 PM Pacific and has a period of performance from March 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026.
The Q&A portion clarifies that while a site-specific work plan is not required (standard ASTM 1527-21 is acceptable), contractors must demonstrate understanding of remote Alaska logistics and tribal village relations. Contractors may use their standard Health and Safety Plan rather than creating a site-specific one. No environmental sampling will be conducted, only field work. The scope covers the entire 1.87-acre BIA parcel (DEC hazard ID 25768), which formerly contained various buildings including a school house and tank farm, and now contains a Fire Hall, Community Center, and City Office. Questions about the amendment should be emailed to jodi.zachary@bia.gov.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140A0525Q0005.pdf | ||
| IEE_Rep_Form.pdf | ||
| A05_-_PWS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
140A0525Q0005 x x
1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR
OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
A13
Sacramento CA 95825
2800 COTTAGE WAY ROOM W2820
Contracting Office
DOI, BIA PACIFIC
A13
Sacramento CA 95825
2800 COTTAGE WAY ROOM W2820
Contracting Office
BIA PACIFIC 00013
02/03/20250001
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
01/16/2025
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to extend the due date and publicly release all questions that have been asked on the solicitation to date and the answers provided by BIA.
The due date and time for this RFQ is hereby changed to 2/5/25, 1200 Noon PS.
All interested parties submitting a quotation must complete blocks 8 and 15A-C of this
Amendment AND INCLUDE the completed page 1 of this Amendment with their quotation.
All questions about this amendment shall be emailed to jodi.zachary@bia.gov.
Period of Performance: 03/01/2025 to 06/30/2026
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
Jodi Zachary
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
Page 1 of 1 2.3.2025
RFQ# 140A1325Q0005, Amendment #1 Phase 1 Environment Site Assessment, Ouzinkie, AK
Questions & Answers
1. Task 1 notes that a planning meeting “will occur within one month of the award where the work plan… will be accepted by BIA”. Industry standard practice does not typically include the preparation of a Site-specific Work Plan for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), as the scope of work for these reports is covered extensively in the ASTM International Standard 1527-21 and is summarized within our proposal. Would BIA find it acceptable to use this standard scope of work, along with the summary of work and schedule laid out in our proposal in lieu of a Site-specific Work Plan for this project?
As noted, adherence to ASTM 1527-21 generally does not necessitate site specific work plan. However, many companies performing PH1 ESAs do so for the purposes of a real estate transfer, whereas our focus is on future remediation efforts and eventual site closure. In addition, many contractors do not understand logistics in remote Alaska or relations with Tribal Villages. Yes, BIA would find it acceptable to use this standard scope of work, along with the summary of work and schedule laid out in a quotation in lieu of a Site-specific Work Plan for this project as long as a there is discussion and understanding of these issues prior to finalization of planning.
2. Task 1 notes that the Contractor shall: “prepare a draft Health and Safety Plan (HASP) in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120 to ensure worker protection.” While we are more than happy to provide BIA with a site-specific HASP for this project, it is industry standard practice to perform Phase I ESA within the auspices of a general HASP, which our company maintains in accordance with 29 CFR
1910.120. Is it acceptable for the purpose of this project to rely on the standard HASP or should we include in the proposal preparation of a site-specific HASP?
If the contractor has such a mechanism in place, it is acceptable for the purpose of this project to rely on their standard HASP.
3. Task 1 notes that the Contractor shall: “Prepare a draft notice to Native Corporation/Village advising them of the proposed site visit and sampling.” The collection of samples is not typically included within the scope of a Phase I ESA. Is BIA requesting that provisions for sampling be included in the scope of this quote and if so, can you provide specifics about the extent of sampling being requested?
No environmental samples will be collected. In this case sampling should have been replaced with field work. The objective is to communicate what will take place to the Village Council.
4. It is our understanding that the BIA parcel in Ouzinkie is approximately 1.87 acres in size and formerly contained the Old School House, a basketball court, a tank farm, a well house, a generator building, a storage building, and two outhouses. It is our understanding that the buildings previously present on the lot have subsequently been demolished and the parcel now contains the Fire Hall, Community Center, and City Office. Is the entirety of the parcel included within the scope of this Phase I, or just the vicinity of these buildings, or just the items remaining on site from prior to the transfer of the property from the BIA to the Municipality of Ouzinkie?
The DEC hazard ID for the site is 25768. The entire parcel is included within the scope of work.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .