133827 - Copy of TAP Scorecard.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 53 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-27-1071-AO-CON01-133827
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This is a scoring workbook for the Massachusetts state procurement system (COMMBUYS) related to the MassAbility Transition to Adulthood Program (TAP) for the 2026 North Shore/Cape Ann and Southeastern Massachusetts regions, managed under Bid BD-27-1071-AO-CON01-133827. The document establishes evaluation criteria and scoring methodologies for the RFR/RFQ process. Bidders must achieve a minimum qualifying score of 60 points to be considered. The procurement is valued above $250,000, requiring all bidders to submit a Supplier Diversity Plan as part of their proposal. The evaluation framework utilizes a standardized workbook with automated calculations to ensure consistency across all bidder scorecards. Scoring is conducted on a 5-point scale for all evaluation criteria, with no partial or half-points permitted.
The scoring structure allocates 75 points to the Program/Business Response and an additional 25 points for the Supplier Diversity Plan component, totaling 100 points for all responses. Weight multipliers are applied to certain criteria to reflect their relative importance, with all weights to be established and locked prior to RFR release. The Massachusetts Office of the Comptroller (OFMB) assigns a member to score the Supplier Diversity Plans on a separate scoring sheet, with these scores subsequently incorporated into the final Score Tabulation worksheet. While the Small Business Purchasing Program does not apply to procurements exceeding $250,000, the evaluation process emphasizes supplier diversity and equity considerations in accordance with Massachusetts purchasing directives. The minimum qualifying threshold of 60 points ensures that only substantially responsive bidders advance in the competitive process.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions Minimum Qualifying Score 60 Pts.
MassAbility RFR/RFQ Score Workbook
| COMMBUYS Bid Number | Bid BD-27-1071-AO-CON01-133827 | Supplier Diversity |
| RFR Name | MassAbility Transition to Adulthood Program 2026 |
North Shore/Cape Ann & Southeastern Massachusetts
| Bids with a value above $250,000 require bidders to provide a Supplier Diversity Plan. | |||
| Supplier Diversity Plans are scored on a separate scoring sheet, titled "SDP Scoring" by a member of OFMB | |||
| Bid Evaluation Start Date | Scores from the SDP Scoring sheet are not reflected on individual Scorecards, but instead pulled in on the "Score Tabulation" sheet for final scoring | ||
| Bid Evaluation End Date | Yes/ No | ||
| Is the value of this procurement greater than $250,000 and require an SDP plan? | Yes | ||
| PMT Members |
| Small Business Purchasing Program (SBPP) |
| Although the SBPP does not guarantee contract awards, Executive Departments are directed to give special consideration to SBPP participants when buying non-construction goods and services estimated to cost $250,000 or less per year. This applies to open-market public procurements as well as requests for quotes solicited from awarded vendors on existing departmental and statewide contracts |
| Yes/ No | |
| Is the value of this procurement less than $250,000 and require consideration of the SBPP? | No |
| Workbook Instructions | |
| This workbook is usable for all types of procurements, includng RFRs and RFQs. | Filling In Score Criteria |
| This workbook uses formulas and coding to keep all pages consistent and to automatically calculate and tabulate scores | All score Criteria, including Mandatory minimums are driven by the "Bidder 1" tab. Once these are filled in, save copies of this scorecard to be used for each Bidder being evaluated. |
| All Scores with an SDP Requirement add up to 100 Points | ||||
| All Scores without an SDP Requirement add up to 75 points | Weight Multipliers | |||
| In most RFRs, some criteria will be more important than others. This column can be used to indicate the relative importance of each criteria. Any number can be used. The higher the number, the higher relative importance versus other criteria. These should be filled out on the Bidder 1 tab prior to commencing scoring responses. All weights must be agreed to and locked down prior to releasing an RFR. | ||||
| Point Value Breakdowns | Fixed Point Values | % Without SDP | % With SDP | |
| SDP | 25 | 0% | 25% | |
| Program / Business Response | 75 | 100% | 75% | |
| Scoring Criteria | ||||
| 100 | 100% | 100% | When scoring responses, fill in only the cells with a Green header; all other cells will calculate based on the information in these cells. No partial or half points are permitted. |
| All criteria are scored on a 5 Point Scale: | ||
| Unsatisfactory | 1 Point | Bidder is unresponsive, or fails to meet the defined criteria |
| Below Average | 2 Points | Bidder is responsive, but response is lacking or not as robust as the expected response |
| Average | 3 Points | Bidder is responsive and adequately addresses the requriements of the criteria |
| Above Average | 4 Points | Bidder is highly responsive, demonsrates an above average understanding of the topic and clearly demonstrates their ability to satisfy the requirement |
| Outstanding | 5 Points | Bidder's response is outstanding in its clarity and their ability to exceed in their deliver the desired requirement |
Score Tabulation
| Score Tabulation Worksheet | ||
| Scores on this sheet are tabulated fom across the workbook. | Notes: | |
| Total scores are color coded to indicate: | >75% | |
| 50-75% | ||
| 25-50% | ||
| <25% | ||
| To be awarded, a vendor must have a "Pass" indicated for Mandatory Minimum Criteria. | ||
| For simple reference, all vendor names who are highlighted in Yellow |
| Bidder 1 |
| 0 |
Mandatory Minimums Requirements Pass
| Supplier Diversity Plan Considered? | Yes |
| Supplier Diversity Plan | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Small Business Purchasing Program | No |
Scored Criteria 0.00
Minimum Qualifying Score 60
Total Score ERROR:#DIV/0!
SDP Scoring
| SDP Required | ||
| https://www.diversitycertification.mass.gov/BusinessDirectory/BusinessDirectorySearch.aspx | ||
| Bidder 1 | Notes/ Certification Screen Shots: | |
| 0 | ||
| SDP Form Received | Yes |
| Estimated Contract Value | |
| Proposed Partner Spend | |
| Prior year Spend | |
| SDP % | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Prime Contractor Certified Business? |
| Certification Body |
| SDO Client ID |
| Date Checked |
| Expiration Date |
| Total Score | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Listed Partner Firms | |
| Firm 1 | |
| SDO Client ID | |
| SDO Expiration | |
| Firm 2 | |
| SDO Client ID | |
| SDO Expiration | |
| Firm 3 | |
| SDO Client ID | |
| SDO Expiration | |
| Firm 4 | |
| SDO Client ID | |
| SDO Expiration |
SBPP Not Considered
| Vendor 1 | Notes/ Certification Screenshots: | |
| 0 | ||
| Small Business Registered? |
| SDO Client ID |
| Date Checked |
| Expiration Date |
https://www.diversitycertification.mass.gov/BusinessDirectory/BusinessDirectorySearch.aspx Bidder 1
Bidder Name Date Reviewed
| Mandatory Requirements to be considered for scoring (OFA) | YES/NO | ||
| 1 | Bidder provided filled in and signed required documents listed on the Bidder's Response Checklist | ||
| 2 | Bidder is not debarred or disqualified from doing business with the Commonwealth | ||
| 3 | |||
| Pass/ Fail | Pass |
PMT Scoring
| Bid Evaluation Criteria | Rating | Points | Weight Multiplier | Score | |
| 1 | Organizational Experience and Capacity | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Staff Knowledge, Skill and Experience | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 3 | Student Engagement and Empowerment | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4 | Ability to Deliver Transition to Adulthood Services | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 5 | Partnering with MassAbility | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 | Quality Assurance and Continuous Quality Improvement | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 7 | Cultural and Linguistic Competency | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Max | 35 | Subtotal | 0 |
| Total (out of 75) | 0 |
&"-,Bold"&16Procurement Scorecard image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .