Attachment_1_-_PPQ.pdf

PDF 286 KB Posted

Attached to
Marine Systems Engineering Consulting Services
Solicitation number
1305M324Q0329
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. The Questionnaire assesses a contractor's past performance on a previous contract across several criteria including quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management. The Questionnaire is for Solicitation # 1305M324Q0329 for Marine Systems Engineering Consulting Services, which is a commercial item procurement by the Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The contract is a small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 541620 and a $19.0M size standard. The solicitation is a combined synopsis/solicitation, and vendors must provide their compliance with FAR Provisions 52.204-24 and 52.204-25. Quotes should include contact information and CAGE code at minimum.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_1305M324Q0329.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1: PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION # 1305M324Q0329

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contractor Being Evaluated:

Contract number:

Project Title:

Period of Performance:

Total Funded Value:

Past Performance Reference Name:

Reference role on the project:

Questionnaire Instructions: Please assess the contractor’s performance on the referenced contract using the following adjectival rating scale:

ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMACE

QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION # 1305M324Q0314

Source Selection Information

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE. Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

Rating:

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance.

Rating:

Comments:

3. COST CONTROL. Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

Rating:

Comments:

4. MANAGEMENT. Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. Check the appropriate rating box.

Rating:

Comments:

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMACE

QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION # 1305M324Q0314

Source Selection Information

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract or order's most significant requirements, I ___would ___would not recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE SIGNATURE [note: digital signature is acceptable]:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor Being Evaluated:
Contract number:
Project Title:
Period of Performance:
Total Funded Value:
Past Performance Reference Name:
Past Performance Reference role on the referenced project:
2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance.
Text1:
Dropdown3: [[Select Rating Below]]
Text6:
Text2:
Text3:
Text4:
Text5:
Text7:
Dropdown1: [[Select Rating Below]]
Dropdown2: [[Select Rating Below]]
Dropdown4: [[Select Rating Below]]
Group4: Off
Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .