13. Brand Name Justification_1.3_Redacted.pdf
PDF 587 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6426724Q0046
About this file
This document contains a justification for using other than full and open competition procedures for a federal contract opportunity. The opportunity is for fiber optic hardware for the Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point WISSv5 system. The justification cites regulatory authorities that allow the use of other than full and open competition, including the items being unique and requiring compatibility with existing installed systems. The opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command for fiber optic hardware to support the Cherry Point WISSv5 network.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2 | 5
The requested supplies services represent the minimum requirements of the government, which have been verified by the certifying technical and requirements personnel.
2. Regulatory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition.
FBO
FAR 13.106-1(b)(i) Soliciting from a single source
FAR 13.106-1(b)(ii) Particular brand-name item
GSA
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(A) An urgent and compelling need exists
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized
FAR 8.405-6(a)(i)(1)(C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures (the original order or BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures).
FAR 8.405-6 (b) Items peculiar to one manufacturer (brand-name item) ID/IQ Task Order/Delivery Order (e.g. NASA SEWP or ARMY CHESS)
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order. [When utilizing this exception, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g., in terms of scope, period of performance, or value).]
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(D) It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.
3. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Regulatory Authority.
a.) The Items Described in Paragraph 1 Must Be Compatible In All Aspects (Form, Fit And Function) With Existing Systems Presently Installed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .