Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Plumas Off Channel Water Sources Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 129JGP18R0031
About this file
Past Perf. Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0003_-_Project_Specs.pdf | ||
| 129JGP18R0031_Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| 129JGP18R0031_Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| 129JGP18R0031_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| Specifications_-_Drawings.pdf | ||
| 129JGP18R0031.pdf | ||
| Fire_Plan.pdf | ||
| General_Decision_Number-_CA180009_01.26.2018.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Plumas NF Off-Channel Water Sources Project
Solicitation No. 129JGP18R0031
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
**NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS**
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Region 5 – Plumas NF, Quincy, CA is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.
Past Performance Information:
Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated: _____________________________________________
Contract No.:________________________ Type of Contract:_______________________________ Project Title:_________________________ Date of Award:_______________________ Completion Date:_______________________________ Location:____________________________ Initial Amount:_______________________ Final Amount:__________________________________ Description:____________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data)
Name of Evaluator:__________________________________________________________ Company/Agency Name:______________________________________________________ Address:___________________________________________________________________ Phone Number:_____________________________________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________ Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:
Rating: If the rating is “Unacceptable”, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.
“G” Good Performance exceeded the contract requirements.
“A” Acceptable Performance met the contract requirements.
“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.
Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information for the following:
1 The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team: O G A M U N/A
2 The firm’s management and coordination of subcontractors/consultants: O G A M U N/A
3 Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct:
O G A M U N/A
4 Timeliness and quality of reports, deliverables, and other required submittals and documents:
O G A M U N/A
5 The firm’s business integrity: O G A M U N/A
6 Responsiveness to client/customer’s requirements: O G A M U N/A
7 Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price: O G A M U N/A
8 Contract Compliance: O G A M U N/A
9 Contract Management: O G A M U N/A
10 Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable:
O G A M U N/A
11 Performance of Public Relations related to construction: O G A M U N/A
12 Quality Control Procedures: O G A M U N/A
13 Compliance with Labor Standards O G A M U N/A
14 Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes please explain:
15 Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated: If no, please explain:
Yes No
16 Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain:
17 Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
18 Additional Remarks:
Additional remarks (cont’d)
19 Overall rating for this firm: O G A M U N/A
Printed Name of Evaluator
Signature of Evaluator Date
This questionnaire should be submitted to the US Forest Service via email to Craig Ericson at cericson@fs.fed.us.
mailto:cericson@fs.fed.us
File details come from the government source that posted it.