Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
Solicitation number
12-94TZ-18-Q-0007
Issued by

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMD_1_1_Pg.docx DOCX document
AMD_1_REVISED_SOW_6_PGS.docx DOCX document
SF_30_1_pg.rtf RTF text file
Atch_3_Maps_11_PGS.pdf PDF
SOL_1294TZ18Q0007.docx DOCX document
Atch_1_PWS_6_PGS.docx DOCX document
Atch_2_LatLongLocations_56_PGS.pdf PDF
Wage_Determinations_33_PGS.pdf PDF
Atch_4_Handbook_Marina_Op_2003_22_PGS.pdf PDF
PreQuoteMeetingInfo03-13-18.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Nav Aids Solicitation 1294TZ18Q0007

ATTACHMENT

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

**NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS**

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Region 3 – Western Zone Contracting is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Evaluated Contractor to complete this section)

Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated:

Work Performed as: ____ Prime Contractor ____Subcontractor Percent of Project Work Performed _____% Description of the Work Performed _____________________________________________________

Contract No.:Type of Contract:_ Project Title:__________
Date of Award:_ Completion Date:_ Location:

Initial Amount: Final Amount:

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete this section)

Name of Evaluator:

Company/Agency Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:__________________________________________________

Signature___________________________________________ Date________________________________

RATINGS: If the rating is “Unacceptable”, please provide additional information in the Remarks section of this form.

“E”ExcellentPerformance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. “VG”Very GoodPerformance exceeded the contract requirements.
“S”SatisfactoryPerformance met the contract requirements.
“M”MarginalPerformance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
“U”UnsatisfactoryPerformance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.

“N/A” Not Applicable

Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information for the following:

1. QUALITY:

a)
Level of quality of workmanship or performance related to this project
E VG S M U
b)
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control
E VG S M U
c)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive

customer guidance.

E VG S M U

Contractor being evaluated______________________________________________ Client: _______________________________________________________________

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

a)
Timeliness of submittals, reports, and other documents
E VG S M U N/A
b)
Compliance with work progress schedule
E VG S M U N/A
c)
Ability to complete work within contract time allowed
E VG S M U

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a)
To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project
E VG S M U
b)
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

Including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes

E VG S M U

c)
To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned

With the interests of the customer

E VG S M U

d)
Responsiveness to customer’s requirements and concerns
E VG S M U
e)
Overall customer satisfaction
E VG S M U

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a)
Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of suppliers,

subcontractors and labor force

E VG S M U N/A

b)
Ability to hire and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N/A
c)
Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U
d)
Effectiveness of overall management
E VG S M U

5. GENERAL

a)
Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM, or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)
E VG S M U N/A
b)
Compliance with contractual terms/clauses
E VG S M U
c)
Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If No, explain below)
YesNo
d)
Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations (if Yes, explain below)

Yes No

e)
In summary, provide an overall rating for this contractor
E VG S M U

REMARKS:

Email this questionnaire to: mmcook@fs.fed.us (Margaret M. Cook, USDA Forest Service, no later the closing date of the solicitation (proposed date 3-28-18).

File details come from the government source that posted it.