127EAV23Q0016 Pecos Janitorial Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 127EAV23Q0016
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PECOS JANITORIAL SERVICES
127EAV23Q0016
127EAV23Q0016
Contractor Past Performance Inquiry
INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Customer:
Our firm has submitted a quote to the USDA Santa Fe National Forest Pecos Ranger District NM. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your firm has been listed as a reference for work previously performed.
Your candid response to the attached survey will assist the evaluation team in this process and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed survey as thoroughly as possible. General information regarding the responses may be released to the quoter; the FAR prohibits the release of names providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained.
Please email the completed form NO LATER THAN 06/02/2023.
DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO OUR COMPANY, PLEASE RETURN TO: shavera.leveille@usda.gov
Contractor Name:
Address:
Contract or Order No:
Total Value of Contract:
Liquidated Damages Assessed:
Contract Award Date:
Final Completion Date:
Name of person completing this form:
Phone Number:
Name of Company or Government Agency:
Description of work this company performed:
RATINGS - Summarize contractor performance and check the number that corresponds to the rating for each category.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| E = Excellent |
| Performance exceeded what was required by the contract |
| VG = Very Good |
| Performance met all the requirements of the contract |
| S = Satisfactory |
| Contractor met most (essentially all) of the requirements of |
the contract
| M = Marginal |
| Contractor met some of the requirements of the contract |
however changes to the contractor’s processes were necessary to achieve contract requirements
| U = Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor failed to meet requirements of the contract |
| N/A = Not Applicable |
| Question did not apply to the contract performed for your |
firm.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Was the project completed in accordance with the contract specifications?
How well did the contractor identify and correct deficient work?
Were submittals, testing, certifications, and final drawings (as-builts) completed accurately and timely?
Was work performed as scheduled?
Were delays resolved quickly and to both parties satisfaction?
Comments:
QUALITY OF SERVICES
Did the contractor provide adequate oversight to sub-contractors, suppliers, employees?
Did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner, contracting agency, and management personnel?
If there were change orders, was the contractor reasonable in defining scope of change and controlling cost?
Did the contractor provide adequate work force (number and skills) for work being performed?
How well did the contractor manage the quality of work?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
[Type here]
TIMELINESS
Did the contractor complete the project on time?
If there were problems, were they addressed and resolved?
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Would you recommend the selection of this contractor again?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .