Questions and Answers.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1240LP23Q0038
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 EstesSpringCSE_Detailed_with_Topos.pdf | ||
| WD 1979-1157 r.64 d 12-27-2022.pdf | ||
| 2023 EstesSpringCSE_Aerial.pdf | ||
| 2023 Estes ParkCSE map.pdf | ||
| 2023 EstesSpring_StandTables.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2023 Estes_Spring_CSE_PWS.pdf | ||
| 1240LP23Q0038- Hell Canyon Common Stand Exam.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers- 1240LP23Q0038 HC Estes Common Stand Exam
1. Is Exhibit 1 , page 31 , correct? It contradicts other information on page 12.
2. Are down dead trees recorded?
3.. Is the a general map of the project location, like a Forest visitor map?
4. Is it necessary to record tree class in remarks? Why not just use the tree class field?
5. Why can’t a 15 BAF be used?
Answers to 1240LP23Q0038 HC Estes Common Stand Exam provided by Tim Gilg
1. Yes, Exhibit 1 is an example of what the setup should look like but the information on page 12 is what information to collect.
2. Down dead trees are not recorded.
3. There is a detailed map with roads in the contract. The forest service has a general travel management map on the website that can be downloaded and used with Avenza maps.
4. Yes, tree class should be recorded on the tree form under tree class. It should not be recorded in the remarks.
5. A BAF factor of 15 can be used with this contract.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .