1240308_SUPPLIER (RFP_REF_DEAM_2405_1240308_ .pdf
PDF 306 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-66062-NONST-2025-000000153
- Issued by
- Fulton County, Atlanta City, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of Atlanta, Department of Enterprise Asset Management, for the operation and management of the City's cafeteria located in Atlanta City Hall. The City is seeking proposals from qualified proponents to provide comprehensive cafeteria services, including continuous service, high-quality food and service, great customer service, and competitive pricing. The cafeteria hours are Monday through Friday, 7:30 AM to 3:00 PM. A pre-proposal conference is scheduled for August 5, 2024, and proposals are due by August 29, 2024. The successful proponent will be required to execute a contract with the City and assume full responsibility for the conduct of its agents and employees during the service period.
The RFP outlines specific requirements for the proponent's management plan, experience and qualifications, organizational structure and key personnel, and financial capability. Proponents must demonstrate a minimum of 5 years of experience in owning and managing a profitable cafeteria, store, or concessions operation within the last 10 years. The City reserves the right to award to multiple proponents and may conduct discussions with short-listed proponents to obtain the best and final offers.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP-REF-DEAM-2405-1240308,
Cafeteria Operation and Management
8/1/24 10:09 AM
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP-REF-DEAM-2405-1240308, Cafeteria Operation and Management
Atlanta, Georgia
Andre Dickens Mayor
Chris Davis
8/1/24 10:09 AM
Commissioner Department of Enterprise Asset Management
Jaideep Majumdar Chief Procurement Officer Department of Procurement
PROJECT OVERVIEW
• Services Being Procured: We are requesting solicitations of proposals from qualified proponents to operate and manage the City's cafeteria, located in Atlanta City Hall. The successful proponent must provide services that include the four pillars of operation: continuous service, high quality service and food, great customer service, and competitive pricing.
• Using Department: Department of Enterprise Asset Management
• Pre-Proposal Conference:
• Monday, August 5 2024 at 10:00am ET via Teams
Conference Call
• Teams Pre-Proposal Conference Information: Register in advance for this Teams Webinar Pre-Conference by clicking the link below or copying the link in your web browser:
https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/826431eb-5dad-42bb- 9e34-d1e2c539cb95@031a550a-f1f3-4b62-9c64-3ef02c7798a5 https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/826431eb-5dad-42bb-9e34-d1e2c539cb95@031a550a-f1f3-4b62-9c64-3ef02c7798a5 https://events.gcc.teams.microsoft.com/event/826431eb-5dad-42bb-9e34-d1e2c539cb95@031a550a-f1f3-4b62-9c64-3ef02c7798a5
8/1/24 10:09 AM
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. All participants must register to attend.
• Deadline to Submit Questions in Writing: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 by 2:00pm.
• Proposal Deadline: Thursday, August 29, 2024 by 2:00 pm ET
• City's Contact Person: Jesse Wilson at jewilson@atlantaga.
gov or 770-658-6776 Ver. 2.1.24
8/1/24 10:09 AM
Table of Contents
1 Requirements
1.0.1 Section 1. Information and Instructions to Proponents
1.0.2 Section 2. Contents of Proposal
1.0.3 Section 3. Required Submittals
1.0.4 Section 4. Exhibit A: Scope of Services
1.0.5 Section 5. Appendix A - Office of Contract Compliance
1.0.6 Section 6. Appendix B - Insurance and Bonding Requirements
2 Lines
2.1 Line Information
2.2 Line Details
2.2. Line 1
3 Appendix: Alternate Lines
3.1 Instructions for Alternate Lines
3.2 Alternate Lines Template
1 Requirements *Response is required
1.1 Section 1. Information and Instructions to Proponents
1.
Part 1: Information and Instructions to Proponents
Part 1: Information and Instructions to Proponents
1. Method of Source Selection and Applicable Law: This Request for proposal ("RFP") is issued by the City of Atlanta pursuant to Section 2-1189 and other applicable provisions of the Procurement and Real Estate Code of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinance ("City's Code). By submitting a proposal to this solicitation, an offeror (herein called a "Proponent") acknowledges familiarity with all laws applicable to this procurement, including, but not limited to, the City's Code, which laws are incorporated into this RFP by reference.
2. Services Being Procured: This RFP seeks to procure the services detailed in the Scope of Services ("Services") on behalf of the City.
3. No Offer by City; Firm Offer by Proponent: This solicitation does not constitute an offer by City to enter into an agreement and cannot be accepted by any Proponent to form an agreement. This procurement is only an invitation for offers from interested Proponents and no offer shall bind City. A Proponent's offer is a firm offer and may not be withdrawn except under the rules specified in City's Code of Ordinances and other applicable law.
4. ProposalDeadline: Your response to this RFP must be received by the Department of Procurement, no later than 2:00 P.M., ET on the date specified in the Project Overview. Any proposal received after this time will not be considered and will not be accepted by the electronic procurement system.
5. Pre-Proposal Conference: Each Proponent is highly encouraged to attend the scheduled Pre-Proposal Conference. Each Proponent must be fully informed regarding all existing and expected conditions and matters which might affect the cost or performance of the Services. Any failure to fully investigate the job requirements shall not relieve any Proponent from the responsibility of evaluating the difficulty or cost of successfully performing the Services properly. A site tour may be scheduled following the Pre-Proposal Conference. Further information will be located in the Project Overview.
6. Procurement Questions; Prohibited Contacts: Any questions regarding this RFP should be submitted in writing to the City's contact person as designated in the Project Overview on or before the date so designated. Questions received after the designated period will not be considered. Any response made by City will be provided in writing to all Proponents by addendum. It is the responsibility of each Proponent to obtain a copy of any addendum issued for this procurement by monitoring the City's website at www.atlantaga.gov. No Proponent may rely on any verbal response to any question submitted concerning this RFP. All Proponents and representatives of any Proponent are strictly prohibited from contacting any other City employees or any third-party representatives of City on any matter having to do with this RFP. All communications by any Proponent concerning this RFP must be made to the City's contact person, or any other City representatives designated by the Chief Procurement Officer in writing.
8/1/24 10:09 AM
7. Ownership of Proposals: Each proposal submitted to the City will become the property of the City, without compensation to a Proponent, for the City's use, in its discretion.
8. Georgia Open Records Act: Information provided to the City is subject to disclosure under the Georgia Open Records Act ("GORA"). Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72(a)(34), "[a]n entity submitting records containing trade secrets that wishes to keep such records confidential under this paragraph shall submit and attach to the records an affidavit affirmatively declaring that specific information in the records constitute trade secrets pursuant to Article 27 of Chapter 1 of Title 10 [O.C.G.A. § 10-1-760 et seq.]".
9. Insurance and/or Bonding Requirements: The Insurance and/or Bonding requirements for any Agreement that may be awarded pursuant to this RFP are set forth in Appendix B - Insurance and Bonding Requirements attached to this RFP.
10. Applicable City OCC Programs: The City's Office of Contract Compliance ("OCC") Programs applicable to this solicitation are set forth in Appendix A - Office of Contract Compliance Requirements, attached to this RFP. By submitting a proposal in response to this RFP, each Proponent agrees to comply with such applicable OCC Programs.
11. Special Rules Applicable to Evaluation of Proposals: A Proponent may be required to submit, in writing, the addresses of any proposed subcontractors or equipment manufacturers listed in the proposal and to submit other material information relative to proposed subcontractors. The City reserves the right to disapprove any proposed subcontractors whose technical or financial ability, resources or experience are deemed inadequate.
12. Examination of Proposal Documents:
12.1. Each Proponent is responsible for examining, with appropriate care, the complete RFP and all Addenda and for informing itself with respect to all conditions which might in any way affect the cost or the performance of any Services. Failure to do so will be at the sole risk of the Proponent, who is deemed to have included all costs for performance of the Services in its proposal.
12.2. Each Proponent shall promptly notify the City in writing should discrepancies, errors, ambiguities or omissions be found in the RFP or if any intent or meaning in the RFP appear unclear or ambiguous, or should any other question arise relative to the RFP. Replies to such notices may be made in the form of an addendum to the RFP, which will be issued simultaneously to all potential offerors who have obtained the RFP from City.
12.3. The City may, in accordance with applicable law, by addendum, modify any provision or part of the RFP at any time prior to the proposal due date and time. The Proponent shall not rely on oral clarifications to the RFP unless they are confirmed in writing by the City in an issued addendum.
13.Evaluation of Proposals; Standard Evaluation Factors and Importance. ln accordance with the City's Code, an Evaluation Committee will review and evaluate each proposal pursuant to the Standard Evaluation Factors below. The importance of each Evaluation Factor is reflected by the relative weight percentage assigned, as listed below:
EVALUATION FACTORS RELATIVE WEIGHT
PERCENTAGE (%)*
Executive Summary/Detailed Executive Summary
10%
Management Plan 40%
Experience/Past Performance 20%
Organizational Structure, Key Personnel and Resumes
20%
Financial Capability 10%
100%
*The relative weight percentage is determined based on the category and complexity of each project and therefore, may differ in each solicitation.
14. Discussions with Responsible Proponents and Revisions to Proposals; General. In accordance with the City's Code, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to conduct discussions with responsible and responsive Proponents who submit proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award for any purpose in the best interests of the City, including the purpose of clarification to ensure full understanding of and responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. In such event, the City will select no less than three Proponents (the "Short-Listed Proponents") deemed to be the most responsible and responsive;
provided, however, that if three or less offerors respond to the RFP, the numerical requirement will not apply. The Short-Listed Proponents shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of proposals, and such revisions may be permitted after submissions and prior to award for the purpose of obtaining the best and final offers. There shall be no disclosure of information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proponents.
14.1. Discussions for Proposal Clarification. The City may elect to hold discussions with any Short-Listed Proponent for the sole purpose of gaining clarification to ensure the City's full understanding of the Proponent's responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. In the event the City elects to hold discussions with Short-Listed Proponents for this purpose, the City will notify such Short-Listed Proponent(s) of the date, time, and location of such discussions in advance of such discussions. To be clear, discussions solely for proposal clarification purposes shall not serve as an opportunity for additional evaluation of any Short- Listed Proponent under this RFP, but rather shall be for the purpose of ensuring the City is obtaining the best and final offers. If following these discussions revisions to the proposal are requested by the City, a fully revised proposal shall be submitted no more than five business days following the conclusion of discussions.
8/1/24 10:09 AM
14.2 Discussions Subject to Additional Evaluation. In the event the City elects to conduct discussions for any purpose other than to solely gain clarification to ensure the City's full understanding of Proponent's responsiveness to the solicitation requirements, such discussions will undergo a separate additional evaluation process from the Standard Evaluation Process set forth above for the purpose of obtaining the best and final position of the Proponent. In such event, the City will announce topics and/or methods for discussion (e.g., demonstration, oral presentation, etc.) to all Short-Listed Proponents in advance of holding any discussions and such announcement will also set forth the total relative weight percentage of such discussions for purposes of conducting the additional evaluation process. The City will notify each Short-Listed Proponent of the date, time, and location of such discussions. If following these discussions revisions to the proposal are requested by the City, a fully revised proposal shall be submitted no more than five business days following the conclusion of discussions.
15. Disqualification of Proponents: Any of the following may be considered as sufficient for disqualification of a Proponent and the rejection of the proposal:
a. Submission of more than one proposal for the same work by an individual, firm, partnership or Corporation under the same or different name(s);
b. Evidence of collusion among Proponents;
c. Previous participation in collusive bidding on Work for the City;
d. Submission of an unbalanced proposal, in which the prices quoted for same items are out of proportion to the prices for other items;
e. Lack of competency of Proponent (the Agreement will be awarded only to a Proponent(s) rated as capable of performing the Work; the City may declare any Proponent ineligible at any time during the process of receiving proposals or awarding the Agreement where developments arise which, in the opinion of the City, adversely affect the Proponent's responsibility;
f. Lack of responsibility as shown by past Work judged from the standpoint of workmanship and progress; financial irresponsibility, including but not limited to, leaving retainage in City account;
g. Uncompleted Work for which the Proponent is committed by Agreement, which in the judgment of the City, might hinder or prevent the prompt completion of Work under this Agreement if awarded to such Proponent; and
h. Being in arrears on any existing or prior contracts with the City or in litigation with the City thereon or having defaulted on a previous contract with the City.
16. Award. Award shall be made to the most responsible and responsive Proponent whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City, taking into consideration the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP.
17. Award of Agreement; Execution: If the City makes an award pursuant to this RFP, the City will prepare and forward to the successful Proponent an Agreement for execution substantially and materially in the form of Agreement included in this RFP.
Execution of the Agreement within 5 business days after notification of award is a requirement of this RFP. Note that the City does
8/1/24 10:09 AM
not intend to modify any language contained in the Agreement as the terms and the conditions are standard, required by law and align with City practices. Any proposed revisions to the terms or language of the Agreement must be submitted in writing with the Proponent's response to the RFP. If no exceptions are submitted, it is assumed that the Proponent fully agrees to the provisions contained in the Agreement in its entirety. Any significant exceptions proposed could render the Proponent ineligible for award under this RFP.
In the event the Scope of Services under this RFP pertains to technology services, the City welcomes the addition of product-specific terms and conditions (e.g., EULA), and such will be exhibited and made part of the Agreement to the extent the technology product-specific terms and conditions are reasonable and do not conflict with the City's terms and conditions. Proponents are required to return any such technology product-specific terms and conditions for the City's consideration with its response to this RFP. If in the City's sole discretion discussion of the technology product-specific terms and conditions are deemed necessary, a representative of the City's Department of Law will contact responsible and responsive Proponents to address any questions the City may have and/or to propose reasonable edits to provisions that are deemed to cause conflict with the City's terms and conditions, or otherwise cause contract ambiguity. In no event will the discussion period with the City's Department of Law extend beyond five
(5) business days from initial contact. For the avoidance of doubt, discussions will be limited to the technology product-specific terms and conditions and will not result in the City's modification of any language contained in the Agreement. Failure to reach agreement with the Proponent on any proposed modifications to technology product-specific terms and conditions within the five (5) -day discussion period could render the Proponent ineligible for award under this RFP.
18. Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act: This RFP is subject to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011 ("IIREA" or "the Act"). IIREA was formerly known as the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act.
Pursuant to the Act, the Proponent must provide with its proposal proof of its registration with and continuing and future participation in the E-Verify Program established by the United States Department of Homeland Security. A completed Contractor Affidavit (Form 1), set forth in Part 4; Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act Forms, must be submitted with the proposal. Under state law, the City cannot consider any proposal which does not include completed forms. Where the business structure of a Proponent is such that Proponent is required to obtain an Employer Identification Number (EIN) from the Internal Revenue Service, Proponent must complete the Contractor Affidavit (Form 1) on behalf of and provide a Federal Work Authorization User ID Number issued to, the Proponent itself. Where the business structure of a Proponent does not require it to obtain an EIN, each entity comprising Proponent must submit a separate Contractor Affidavit (Form 1). It is not the intent of this notice to provide detailed information or legal advice concerning the Act. All Proponents intending to do business with the City are responsible for independently apprising themselves of and complying with the requirements of the Act and assessing its effect on City procurements and their participation in those procurements. For additional information on the E-Verify program or to enroll in the program, go to: https://e-verify.uscis.gov/enroll. Additional information on completing and submitting the Contractor Affidavit (Form 1) precedes the Affidavit.
19. Multiple Awards: The City reserves, at its sole discretion, the option to award to multiple Proponents. Multiple awards may be made on the total Scope of Services or components of the Scope of Services.
20. Cancellation of Solicitation; Rejection of Proposals: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this RFP may be canceled or any or all proposals may be rejected in whole or in part in accordance with the City's Code.
Ver. 2.7.2024 https://e-verify.uscis.gov/enroll
8/1/24 10:09 AM
1.2 Section 2. Contents of Proposal
*1.
Part 2; Contents of Proposals/Required Submittals
1. General Contents of Proposals: A Proponent must submit a complete Proposal in response to this RFP in the format specified in this RFP; no other format will be considered.
2. Informational Proposal: The information drafted and submitted by Proponent in response to this RFP, which must be set forth in and include each of the following parts:
2.1. Executive Summary;
2.2. Management and Overall Approach to Deliver Scope of Services;
2.3. Experience and Qualifications of Proponent Team and Performance on Previous Projects;
2.4. OrganizationalStructure,KeyPersonnelandResumes.
3. Information Requirements Details: The following is a more detailed summary of the Informational Proposal and should be tabbed as indicated:
3.1. Executive Summary – suggested 6 page maximum
The executive summary must include a letter with the Proponent's name, address, telephone number and fax number, signed by a person authorized to act on behalf of the Proponent. The letter should also include the name, title, address, e-mail address, telephone number and fax number of the person signing the letter and the name, title, address, e-mail address, telephone number and fax number of one (1) contact person to
8/1/24 10:09 AM
whom all future correspondence and/or communications may be directed by the City concerning this procurement, if that person is different from the person executing the letter. The letter should also designate the type of business entity that proposes to enter into a Contract with the City and the identity of any other business entities that will comprise the Proponent and include a brief history of the Proponent and statement of the Proponent's approach to providing the services solicited in this RFP including any initiatives you plan to implement to benefit Department of Enterprise Asset Management. The Executive Summary must contain the following information:
3.1.1. Complete legal name of the Proponent and the name of the legal entities that comprise the Proponent. The Proponent must provide the domicile where each entity comprising it is organized, including entity name, brief history of the entity, contact name, address, phone number, and facsimile number, as well as the legal structure of the entity and a listing of major satellite offices;
3.1.1.1. If Proponent is a corporation or limited liability company formed in the State of Georgia, Proponent must include a copy of its Certificate of Incorporation or its Certificate of Organization from the Georgia Secretary of State's office; or
3.1.1.2. If Proponent is a corporation or limited liability company formed outside the State of Georgia, Proponent must include a copy of its Certificate of Existence from the Georgia Secretary of State's office or the Secretary of State office where formed. Proponent must provide a certificate of authority to transact business in Georgia issued by the Georgia Secretary of State prior to the award of any contract.
3.1.2. Litigation Disclosure Statement. A declarative statement as to whether the Proponent or any member of the Proponent's team has an open dispute with the City or is involved in any litigation associated with work in progress or completed work in either the private or public sector during the past five (5) years; and
3.1.3. Demonstrate an understanding of Enterprise Asset Management goals and objectives to be accomplished by the scope of services.
3.2. Management and Overall Approach to Deliver Scope of Services– suggested 15 page maximum: The Proponent must provide the overall management approach that the team proposes to use to successfully carry out the scope of services to Operate and Manage a Cafeteria. Specifically address the following:
3.2.1. Overall approach for organizing the team to be able to respond timely to as-needed tasks, as well as ensuring the availability of individuals identified in the Proposal;
3.2.2. Approach to providing:
3.2.2.1.Continuous Service– Breakfast & Lunch daily, 7:30am – 3pm.
3.2.2.2.Quality of food- cleanliness, presentation, types/variety, healthy selections
3.2.2.3.Great Customer Service
3.2.2.4.Competitive pricing- for all food & beverage products
3.2.2.5.Sample Cafeteria Menu - Proponent shall provide a sample cafeteria menu for
8/1/24 10:09 AM
breakfast and lunch inclusive of pricing. See Section 3 of the Scope of Services for further information.
3.2.3. Plan for coordination and communication with City staff;
3.2.4. Approach on how the work is to be managed by the Proponent (or Joint Venture) considering that work may be performed by a team comprised of Key Staff and team members from various firms;
3.2.5. The successful Proponent shall assume full responsibility for the conduct of his agents and/or employees during the time such agents or employees are on the premises for the purpose of performing the Work herein specified; and
3.2.6. Specifically, based on the Proponent's Organizational structure, describe how the proponent will manage the Services, specifically addressing the following:
3.2.6.1. Ensure proper communication and coordination among pertinent project team members;
3.2.6.2. Establish and maintain the necessary cooperative relationships.
3.2.7. Sustainability Initiative - Describe how Proponent plans to achieve and maintain each of the below-referenced standards:
3.2.7.1. Train staff on zero waste strategies as they become available;
3.2.7.2. Provide guidance to the City on zero waste strategies;
3.2.7.3. Provide signage on zero waste and locally sourced foods to highlight sustainable practices employed in the cafeteria;
3.2.7.4. Provide for recyclable and/or compostable service ware and packaging;
3.2.7.5. Provide products in recyclable or compostable packaging;
3.2.7.6. Provide nutritional information that includes warnings for common allergens
3.3. Experience and Qualifications of Proponent Team and Performance on Previous Projects – Suggested 25 page maximum: Proponent must clearly demonstrate that it meets all the minimum qualification requirements outlined in this RFP. Specifically:
3.3.1 Minimum Qualifications
3.3.1.1 The Proponent must possess five (5) years' experience within the last ten (10) years owning and managing a Cafeteria, store, or concessions that has generated a profitable revenue stream.
3.3.2 Point of Sale – Describe Proponent's Point of Sale ("POS") System.
3.3.2.1 City requires the Proponent to have a POS System that will allow for efficient services and capture necessary financial data.
3.3.2.1.1 The POS system must be able to process all cash transactions and most credit card and debit card transactions. Proponents must reflect all exemptions within their proposal; and
3.3.2.1.2 The POS software package should tie together information captured at the minute visibility of the store operations. Those operations include inventory, accounts receivable, ordering/availability, and other relevant management functions and reports such as sale trending reports.
8/1/24 10:09 AM
3.3.3 Provide the Proponent's experience in providing service to other government entities, or other entities;
3.3.3.1 A matrix identifying three (3) projects that the Proponent has served and/or operated in the last five (5) years in Cafeteria, Operation and Management Services.The matrix must include:
3.3.3.2 Thename ofthe restaurant and/or cafeteria;
3.3.3.3 ThevalueofthecontractunderwhichProponentworked;
3.3.3.4 Brief description of the cafeteria, including size and types of foods provided by the components
3.3.3.5 Descriptionofservices provided andperformedbytheProponent;
3.3.3.6 Number of subcontractors/sub-consultants managed by the Proponent and the work performed by those subcontractors/sub-consultants; and
3.3.3.7 Owner references for each project, including contact name and telephone number.
3.4 OrganizationalStructure,KeyPersonnelandResumes:The Proponent's Organizational Structure Section of the Proposal must consist of a Chart and a Narrative Description. The Chart must contain the following information.
3.4.1 A description of the Proponent's Management organization in narrative format. The narrative must provide a description of the Proponents' views on how it will provide the Services, as well as describe the relationship of its Key Personnel to that of the Principal- in-Charge and other key members of the management team. Describe how this organization will facilitate managing the Services requested and how an efficient flowofinformation will berealized to ensure all Services are fully coordinated within the organization.
3.4.2 Full time employees of the Proponent (including administrative staff) to include position, years with Proponent, and licenses or certifications held.
3.4.2.1 Provide Resumes for Key Personnel you intend to assign to this Project for the following positions:
3.4.2.1.1 Principal-in-Charge (Executive Chef) - Minimum of ten (10) consecutive years' experience in the field leading up to today.
3.4.2.1.2 General Manager/Kitchen Manager - Minimum of eight (8) years' experience in the field.
3.4.2.1.3 Prep Cook/Line Cook- Minimum of eight (8) years' experience in the field.
3.4.2.1.4 Cashier Minimum of four (4) years' experience in the field.
3.4.2.2 For each person listed, submit a written resume, not exceeding 2 pages per person, organized as follows
1. Nameandtitle;
2. Professionalbackground;
3. Currentandpastrelevantemployment;
4. Education;
5. Certifications;
6. List of 3 relevant projects, including client name, project description, project value, role of the individual, project completion date.
Submission of these names constitutes a commitment to use these individuals if the Proponent is awarded a Contract, and changes may be made only with the prior written
8/1/24 10:09 AM
consent of the City.In the event there is need to replace key team members during the term of any Contract awarded, if any, Proponent must describe its back-up personnel plan.
3.4.3. The physical resources the Proponent owns, including equipment, vehicles, etc. (include the year and model when identifying equipment and vehicles).
3.5 References: Proponent shall provide the names, addresses, and current phone numbers of a minimum of two (2) references for each project.
*Note: A reference is non-responsive if the Proponent's information cannot be verified by a reference within seven (7) calendar days of first contact attempt by the City of Atlanta. The City may, at its sole discretion, contact references to verify project work. If the City chooses to exercise that discretion, the same reference checking criteria will be applied to all Proponents.
4 Submission of Proposals:
4.1. Each Proponent should submit a digital version of its Proposal in Adobe Portable Document Format ("PDF") via the ATLCloud system; and
4.2. If Certain Portions of your response are considered confidential and proprietary, we would recommend that you mark any portion of your proposal that you deem to be confidential as such, however, it cannot be guaranteed that the City will not have to disclose such information in accordance with its interpretation of the applicable public records laws. Please refer to the Georgia Open Records Acts (O.C.G.
A. § 50-18-72) for information not subject to public disclosure.
5 Responsiveness and responsibility for each Proponent can be observed as the following:
A. The responsiveness of a Proponent is determined by, but not limited to, the following:
1. A timely and effective delivery of all services, materials, documents, and/or other
8/1/24 10:09 AM
information required by the City;
2. The completeness of all material, documents and/or information required by the City; and
3. The notification of the City of methods, services, supplies and/or equipment that could reduce cost or increase quality.
B. The responsibility of a Proponent is determined by, but not limited to, the following:
1. The ability, capacity, and skill of the Proponent to perform the Agreement or provide the Work required;
2. The capability of the Proponent to perform the Agreement or provide the Work promptly, or within the time specified without delay or interference;
3. The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the Proponent;
4. The quality of performance of previous contracts or work;
5. The previous existing compliance by the Proponent with laws and ordinances relating to the Agreement or Work;
6. The sufficiency of the financial resources and ability of the Proponent to perform Agreement for providing the Work; and
7. The quality, availability and adaptability of the supplies or contractual Work to the particular use required.
6 Selection of Competitive Sealed Proposals.
8/1/24 10:09 AM
The City will carefully evaluate the responsiveness and responsibility of each Proponent. The selection criteria shall include but not be limited to those factors contained in Sections 2-1188(k) of the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances, and the factors set forth in the Evaluation of Proposals. It is solely the responsibility of the Proponent to adhere to all evaluation factors outlined in this RFP.
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description Part 2 - Contents of Proposal
File
Select one of the following:
a. I have attached Volume I of my proposal (Response attachments are required)
8/1/24 10:09 AM
1.3 Section 3. Required Submittals
1. Please see attached CPO Letter
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description CPO Supplier Letter File
*2. Required Submittals - Forms
All Respondents, including, but not limited to, corporate entities, limited liability companies, joint ventures, or partnerships, that submit a Proposal or Bid in response to this solicitation must fill out all forms in their entirety, and all forms must be signed, notarized or sealed with the corporate seal (if applicable), as required per each form's instructions.
If Respondent intends to be named as a Prime Contractor(s) with the City, then Respondent must fill out all the forms listed in this solicitation document; otherwise, Respondent may be deemed non-responsive.
Please download the Required Submittals package below, complete the forms with all required information, then scan and attach the completed forms package.
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description RFP Required Submittals 9.25.2
File
Select one of the following:
a. I have attached the completed forms. (Response attachments are required)
3.
ItemNumber Proposal Submittal Check
CheckSheet ð
1 Informational Proposal:
• Executive Summary
• Management Plan
• Experience/Past Performance
• Organizational Structure, Key Personnel and Resumes References
2 OfficeofContract Compliance (Appendix A Required Submittals Forms)
Required DocumentsAllRequiredProcurement Documents(ifanyoftherequiredsubmittaldocumentsare not submittedor incomplete withinyour Proposalsubmittalpackage,your firm may be deemednon-re sponsive).
Required Submittalsinclude butare not limited to:
• Form 1; Georgia Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act (IIREA) Form
• Form 2; Contractor Disclosure and Declaration Form
• Form 3;Financial Responsibility
• Form 4; Offeror Contact Directory
• Form 5; Reference List
• Form 6; Proposal Guarantee; - N/A
• Form 7; Prohibited Sources' Ethics Pledge
• Authority to Transact Business in the State of Georgia
• Statement of Qualifications
3A
• Cost Proposal (Exhibit A.1) – N/A
4 Proponent's Official Company Name:
Company Physical Address:
5 President/VicePresident/OwnerName:
Title: OfficeTelephoneNumber:___________________ DirectCell TelephoneNumber:
Email Address:
6 PrimaryPoint-of-ContactConcerning RFP: __________ Title: _ ___ OfficeTelephoneNumber: ____ DirectCell TelephoneNumber: ____ Email Address: _________
8/1/24 10:09 AM
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description Submittal Checklist 6.12.24.pd
File
Select one of the following:
a. I have attached the Submittal Checklist. (Response attachments are optional)
8/1/24 10:09 AM
1.4 Section 4. Exhibit A: Scope of Services
1. Please See Attached Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description Cafeteria OM Scope Final 7-12-
File
8/1/24 10:09 AM
1.5 Section 5. Appendix A - Office of Contract Compliance
*1.
Appendix A Office of Contract Compliance Requirements
Please see attached
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description (Policy Statement) RFP-
REF-DEA
File
Select one of the following:
a. I have attached the OCC forms. (Response attachments are required)
8/1/24 10:09 AM
1.6 Section 6. Appendix B - Insurance and Bonding Requirements
1.
Appendix B Insurance and Bonding Requirements
Please see attached.
Attachments:
File Name or URL Type Description
RFP-REF-DEAM-2405-
1240308, Caf
File
2 Lines
2.1 Line Information
Line Target Quantity
Response Quantity
Response Price
Line Amount
Promised Date
1-Food Service - Cafe
8/1/24 10:09 AM
2.2 Line Details
2.2. Line 1 Food Service - Cafe
To provide an alternate line, see appendix.
Category Name FOOD Allow Alternate Lines Yes Alternate Line Provided Yes No
Requested Date Location 55 Trinity Avenue SW
ATLANTA, GA
30303Fulton
Start Price (USD)
4 Appendix: Alternate Lines
4.1 Instructions for Alternate Lines
Alternate lines are allowed for some negotiation lines. For these lines, you can propose one or more alternatives by entering information for each alternate line in the format given below. Print and insert multiple copies as per your requirement.
4.2 Alternate Lines Template
Negotiation Line
(Number and description of the negotiation line for which you have an alternative)
Example:1-xxxxxx where xxxxxx is the line description of first negotiation line.
Alternate Line Number (Enter only numbers in sequence starting with 1 for every alternate line)
Alternate Line Description
Response Price (For a negotiation line with cost factors, enter your line price in the cost factors table)
Response Quantity
UOM
Promised Date
Note to Buyer
Proprietary and Confidential 27
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .