USDA_Past_Performance_Rating_Form.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
Marine Cargo Surveys Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12-1NTS-20-Q-0001
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service Washington Office

About this file

Past Performance Rating Form - Word document.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION 12-1NTS-20-Q-0001

PLEASE RETURN TO cita.trice@usda.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Solicitation Number 12-1NTS-20-Q-0001. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer via cita.trice@usda.gov.

Questionnaire is due to Cita Trice no later than October 21, 2019. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.

For the purpose of gathering USDA past performance information please complete the following questions to the best of your knowledge, only considering contracts for the past three years.

Thank you.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Performance

Comments, if any.

Question 2. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide deliverables in a timely manner?

Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Comments, if any.

Question 3. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements and schedule) on contract being assessed?

Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________ Date: ____________

Title: ______________________________________________________

Company Name: _____________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it.