AMD 1 - 12-161-SOL-00026.pdf

(x)

12-161-SOL-00026

x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Dallas TX 75202-5433 Suite# 1071 1301 Young Street Division of Eng. Services Dallas

06/22/2012000001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

06/22/2012

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Facility Engineering Techical Specialist Support for the IHS Phoenix Area Office

A. The Evaluation Criteria Table on page 35 of the RFP lists an incorrect Weight for a criterion. For convenience, the attached RFP Page 35 replaces the original Page 35 in its entirety.

B. No other changes are made to the Request for Proposals.

Period of Performance: 10/08/2012 to 10/07/2013

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

DANIEL D. FINLEY

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Facility Engineering Technical Support Solicitation 12-161-SOL-00026

PART IV, SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The proposal will be evaluated based on price, other price-related factors and responses to the Technical Evaluation Criteria. Price and other price related factors is an important aspect of the evaluation and will be assigned a weighting of 35% of the total evaluation. However, the Government is seeking to make an award for the proposal that provides the best overall value and might not award a contract to the offeror proposing the lowest rates depending on the attributes detailed in the response for the Technical Evaluation Criteria below.

For the Technical Evaluation, which accounts for 65% of the total evaluation, the criteria in the Table below will be used to evaluate proposals.

The Government reserves the right to conduct personal interviews after the initial evaluation have been completed. Such interviews will be conducted at the IHS Phoenix Area Office, 40 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ. If such interviews are held, the Offeror will be so informed with a date and time for the interview by the Contracting Officer.

The weight factors listed to the right in the table below is the percentage each criterion represents of the total of 100 percent of the Technical Evaluation.:

Item Technical Evaluation Criteria Weight Factor

1 Qualifications and Experience of Nominated Individual(s): Relevant experience covering the health care facilities activities outlined in the scope of work. Qualifications of Team members and history with the firm and duration of each team member in their current position.

Percentage of work over the past 2-years that has been healthcare related.

2 Native American Experience: Experience of Nominated Individuals working in Indian Country or with Indian tribes.

3 Federal Experience – Corporate Experience relating to services for federal agencies. Examples include, but are not limited to:

Experience working with federal agencies, particularly the IHS and the BIA.

4 Past Performance – Past performance of Nominated Individuals on similar contracts with government agencies, tribal agencies, and/or private industry in terms of demonstrate responsiveness to the needs and requirements of the customer.

(End of Section)