032_Attachment_4-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Secure radio storage locker and RFID tracking
- Solicitation number
- 1333MK26Q0063
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for federal contract solicitation 1333MK26Q0063, issued by NOAA. The questionnaire is designed to be completed by references for contractors being evaluated during the source selection process and must be submitted to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than May 13, 2026 at 1600 PST.
The questionnaire contains four evaluation categories, each with a five-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory). The first category assesses Quality of Service, evaluating the contractor's performance against contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship, including technical, professional, and environmental standards. The second category addresses Schedule, assessing timeliness in completing contracts, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements. The third category evaluates Cost Control, examining the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling costs. The final category covers Management, assessing the contractor's integration and coordination of all contract execution activities, including problem identification, corrective action planning, proposal submittals, cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. Each category includes space for detailed comments. The questionnaire concludes with fields for the rater's name, signature, and date, as well as an additional comments section.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1333MK26Q0063.pdf | ||
| 002_140802-26-0325_Statement_of_Need.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information
ATTACHMENT 4:
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION
1333MK26Q0063
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION:
REFERENCE CONTRACT #:
PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than 05/13/2026
1600 PST
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
mailto:isaac.bright@noaa.gov
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Send Completed Questionnaire to Isaac Bright at isaac.bright@noaa.gov no later than 05/13/2026 1600 PST |
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2. SCHEDULE |
| 3. COST CONTROL |
| 4. MANAGEMENT |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .