00265_RFP Attch 2 - PPQ_Final.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NEED30002100265
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors providing professional program science support services to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The questionnaire requests ratings on quality, schedule, price/cost control, management, and subcontractor management for an incumbent contractor. Respondents are asked to provide narrative justification and signature. The completed questionnaire must be returned by email to the specified contracting officer by May 28, 2021.
The related federal contract opportunity notice is a combined synopsis/solicitation issued by the Department of Commerce NOAA seeking proposals from eligible 8(a) small businesses to provide CoastWatch professional program science support services. Proposals must adhere to the terms of FAR 52.212-1 and be submitted in response to solicitation number NEED30002100265. The requirement is for time-and-materials support in NAICS code 541715 with a performance period and award date unspecified.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 20210524_00265_RFP Sects. A-M_thru Amd 2.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Sects. A-M_thru Amd 1.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Attch 1 - Price Schedule Summary_thru Amd1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00265_RFP QA Matrix_Final.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Attch 1 - Price Schedule Summary_Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00265_RFP Sects. A-M_Base.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Attch 5 - NDA Template.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Attch 4 - QASP.pdf | ||
| 00265_RFP Attch 3 - PPRI_Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT #2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
CENTER FOR SATELLITE APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH (STAR), COASTWATCH CENTRAL (CWC) PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM SCIENCE SUPPORT SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
<Header section, in gray fill, is to be completed by the offeror and provided to the reference with a description of the project and instructions to submit the completed questionnaire directly to the government contact identified in Section 4. >
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Contract Name:
Contract Period of Performance:
Contract Description:
Rater Name:
Rater Telephone:
Rater E-Mail Address:
Rater’s Role in Relation to Contract (program/project manager, contracting officer, major end user, etc.):
RATINGS DEFINITIONS
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
INDEX
Section 1 – Ratings Section 2 – Additional Narrative Justification Section 3 – Signature of Rater Section 4 – Return Instructions Section 5 – Contact Information
Please provide any relevant information to support the above ratings.
<Note: When completing this questionnaire by e-mail, please do not use a color, such as red, to select the rating in section I of this questionnaire. Color fonts do not show well when printed. Just bold it, underline it, or increase the font size in black.>
Section 1 Contractor Performance
Quality:
1. How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s products/services provided (e.g., compliance with contract requirements and accuracy of work)?
Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>
Response (Check One)
☐Exceptional
☐Very Good
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Schedule:
2. How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness (e.g., met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, on-time completion, wrap-up and contract administration, and no liquidated damages assessed)?
☐Exceptional
☐Very Good
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Price/Cost Control:
3. How would you rate the performance of the contractor’s ability to control costs?
☐Exceptional
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Management:
4. How would you rate the contractor’s management and business relations (e.g. effective management, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, effective recommended solutions, and business-like concerns for Government’s interests)?
Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>
☐Exceptional
☐Very Good
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Management, continued:
5. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet special needs (such as contingency support, innovative IT solutions, etc.) for delivery requirements?
☐Exceptional
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Subcontractors (Small Business Utilization, if applicable):
6. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage, coordinate, and integrate subcontractors, and if applicable utilize small business subcontractors?
☐Exceptional
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
7. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the contractor’s performance?
☐Exceptional
☐Satisfactory
☐Marginal
☐Unsatisfactory
Section 2
Additional Supporting Narrative, if required: <Include the number of the question to which this supporting narrative applies. Additional pages may be used.>
Section 3
Signature of rater: _______________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________ <Signature of rater is required, if faxed. It is not required if sent via e-mail directly from rater to todd.blose@noaa.gov.>
Section 4
Return the completed questionnaire via e-mail to: todd.blose@noaa.gov
Please return the completed questionnaire by 2:00pm Eastern Time on May 28, 2021.
Section 5
For any questions pertaining to the questionnaire, please contact: Todd Blose, Contracting Officer, by email at todd.blose@noaa.gov.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .