UNSPSC 85903052: Filtered speech assessment

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a physical rehabilitation intervention or procedure of filtered speech assessment. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code F00Z0ZZ

UNSPSC 85903052 Filtered speech assessment, a Commodity code, does not align with the state and local procurement activity in the source. The recent opportunities tagged under this code span occupational health services, medical director and EMS services, behavioral health support, cancer screening, employee wellness clinics, inmate healthcare, dental services, phlebotomy, background screening, and histology lab work—none of which fall within the scope of speech assessment or audiology services. The code's nominal definition and the actual recent solicitations show no meaningful overlap, indicating that state and local procurement offices are using this code incorrectly or the code carries different operational meaning than its formal taxonomy name suggests.

The issuing bodies are geographically dispersed across multiple states and jurisdiction types, including county health departments (Seminole County, Florida; Solano County, California; Collier County, Florida), state agencies (Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Texas Department of Agriculture; Oregon Health Authority; Illinois Environmental Protection Agency; Nevada Department of Public Safety), school districts (Hillsborough County Public Schools, Austin Independent School District, Katy Independent School District, Northside Independent School District), municipal governments (City of Atlanta, City of Phoenix, City of Ocala), regional authorities (Harris Health System, Houston-Galveston Area Council, Atlanta Regional Commission), and correctional agencies (Atlanta City Detention Center, Collier County Sheriff's Office). No issuing body appears more than once in the recent-opportunities block, and the activity spans procurement offices in Florida, California, Texas, Oregon, Georgia, Illinois, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Arizona, South Carolina, Washington, and Ohio. Given the mismatch between the code's title and actual procurement, the geographic and jurisdictional spread reflects only that multiple agencies are applying an inappropriate classification rather than evidence of concentrated or growing demand for the code's nominal service.