UNSPSC 85877319: Magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of left kidney using other contrast, unenhanced and enhanced

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of left kidney using other contrast, unenhanced and enhancedmagnetic resonance imaging (mri) of left kidney using other contrast, unenhanced and enhanced. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BT32Y0Z

UNSPSC 85877319 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of left kidney using other contrast, unenhanced and enhanced is a Commodity code that describes a specific clinical diagnostic imaging procedure. The recent state and local contract opportunities posted under this code show little alignment with the nominal scope — they instead cover broader health system infrastructure, staffing, and service contracting rather than individual MRI procedures or imaging studies. San Mateo Medical Center's RFP for a Diagnostic Imaging Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) addresses enterprise imaging software and data management across multiple modalities (radiology, cardiology, mammography), while the Santa Clara Health System's qualification vehicle for temporary health professional staffing includes diagnostic imaging and radiology technicians as one category among thirteen ancillary clinical positions. These opportunities reflect how state and local health systems actually procure imaging services — not as itemized diagnostic procedures but as technology platforms, staffing capacity, and system contracts supporting high-volume clinical operations.

Activity under this code appears limited and concentrated in California. Beyond the San Mateo and Santa Clara examples, the recent-opportunities block contains no additional state or local solicitations tagged with this commodity code. The geographic and issuing-body data available are insufficient to characterize the code's typical market; what does emerge is that county health systems and public hospital operators post imaging-related work under broader family or class codes rather than this specific procedure-level commodity. The mismatch between the code's clinical specificity (a single organ, imaging modality, and contrast protocol) and the actual procurement activity suggests that state and local buying offices may tag system-level imaging contracts with placeholder or higher-tier codes instead, or that this commodity code sees minimal direct solicitation activity in the state and local space.