UNSPSC 85876832: Magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of left ankle using other contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of left ankle using other contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BQ3HYZZ

UNSPSC 85876832 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of left ankle using other contrast, a Commodity code, shows little relevant recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal clinical imaging scope. The three most recent opportunities posted under this code involve diagnostic imaging systems procurement (San Mateo Medical Center's PACS implementation), school district special education contracted services (Birdville Independent School District), and temporary health professional staffing (Santa Clara County Health System); only the first—a PACS platform supporting radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging—connects substantively to medical imaging, while the latter two are unrelated to the code's specific service definition.

Recent activity comes from health systems and school districts in California and Texas. San Mateo Medical Center posted an RFP on October 7, 2026 (due October 21, 2026) for enterprise-grade PACS implementation with EPIC Electronic Health Record integration, supporting approximately 65,000 radiology studies, 5,000 cardiology studies, and 8,000 mammography interpretations annually, with migration of existing imaging data and implementation within 9–12 months. Santa Clara County Health System posted an RFQ on July 7, 2026 (due October 7, 2026) establishing a qualified vendor pool for temporary health professional staffing across ancillary clinical categories including diagnostic imaging and radiology services. The code's nominal focus on specific MRI protocol imaging of the ankle appears poorly aligned with what state and local procurement actually tags it to; the mismatch suggests either data-entry error or broader imaging system categorization by the issuing bodies rather than granular clinical protocol coding.