UNSPSC 85876507: Fluoroscopy of left elbow using high osmolar contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to fluoroscopy of left elbow using high osmolar contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BP1H0ZZ

UNSPSC 85876507 Fluoroscopy of left elbow using high osmolar contrast is a Commodity code with limited alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code describes a specific diagnostic imaging procedure using contrast media, yet the most recent solicitations under this code classify as healthcare IT infrastructure, ultrasound equipment procurement, and phlebotomy support services — none of which constitute fluoroscopy procedures or contrast-based imaging work. San Mateo Medical Center (California) is soliciting a diagnostic imaging Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) to support radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging with EPIC integration and data migration from legacy systems; Collier County (Florida) issued a single-source notice for ultrasound equipment and related software licensing; and the Albuquerque Police Department (New Mexico) posted a request for bids for on-call phlebotomy and blood draw services. The issuing bodies span county health systems, county procurement offices, and municipal police departments, reflecting fragmented healthcare delivery and public safety operations rather than a consolidated procurement category.

Geographic activity is dispersed across California, Florida, and New Mexico, with no concentration indicating a regional market. The PACS opportunity from San Mateo Medical Center (RFP posted July 9, 2026, due August 7, 2026) represents the most substantial scope, requiring enterprise-grade implementation with 99.9% uptime, support for 100 concurrent users, and a 9–12 month deployment within a five-year agreement. The code shows little recent activity aligned to its stated commodity definition; the mismatch suggests either incorrect code tagging by issuing bodies or significant divergence between the taxonomy label and actual state and local spending patterns in diagnostic imaging and healthcare services.