UNSPSC 85875736: Plain radiography of bilateral fallopian tubes using high osmolar contrast

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to plain radiography of bilateral fallopian tubes using high osmolar contrast. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BU020ZZ

UNSPSC 85875736 Plain radiography of bilateral fallopian tubes using high osmolar contrast is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its abstract scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The code's nominal focus on a specific diagnostic imaging procedure does not match the actual work being solicited under it. Recent opportunities tagged to this code span diagnostic imaging systems, ultrasound equipment, and clinical laboratory services — none of which are plain radiography or fallopian tube imaging. State and local health care systems, counties, and police departments are the primary issuing bodies, but their solicitations address enterprise Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS), portable ultrasound platforms, and phlebotomy services rather than the narrow radiographic procedure the code nominally describes.

Geographic activity appears concentrated in California, Florida, and New Mexico based on recent postings. San Mateo Medical Center (California) posted an RFP on July 9, 2026, for a Diagnostic Imaging PACS implementation due August 7, 2026, seeking enterprise-grade imaging systems to support radiology, cardiology, and dental operations with EPIC Electronic Health Record integration and migration of legacy imaging data. Collier County, Florida, issued a Notice of Intent to Single Source on April 1, 2026, for EchoNous ultrasound equipment and related services. The Albuquerque Police Department posted an RFB on January 26, 2026, for on-call phlebotomy technician services due February 25, 2026. The code's low precision and the diversity of actual procurement activity suggest that this category may be misapplied to state and local health care contracting, or that tagging inconsistency is routing unrelated clinical and diagnostic service procurements under it. Bidders pursuing this code should verify alignment with specific issuing-body solicitations rather than rely on the code's nominal description.