UNSPSC 85875270: Fluoroscopy of bilateral acromioclavicular joints

This classification denotes the group of activities that yields a imaging intervention or procedure to fluoroscopy of bilateral acromioclavicular joints. This intervention or procedure is listed in the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10 as code BP13ZZZ

UNSPSC 85875270 Fluoroscopy of bilateral acromioclavicular joints is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The three most recent opportunities tagged under this code span diagnostic imaging system implementation, ultrasound equipment procurement, and phlebotomy services — none of which directly address bilateral acromioclavicular joint fluoroscopy as a discrete clinical service line. The code appears to be applied inconsistently across issuing bodies, suggesting either miscoding at the point of solicitation or a broad institutional interpretation of imaging and diagnostic services under this taxonomy entry. State and local health systems, county health departments, and police agencies have posted opportunities under this code, but the work being actually solicited does not cluster around fluoroscopy procedures or imaging interpretation services as the code name implies.

San Mateo County Medical Center posted an RFP on July 9, 2026 (due August 7, 2026) for an enterprise-grade Diagnostic Imaging PACS system supporting radiology, cardiology, and dental imaging with EPIC integration, representing systems-level infrastructure investment rather than clinical service procurement. Collier County, Florida issued a Notice of Intent on April 1, 2026 to single-source EchoNous ultrasound equipment and related services, and the Albuquerque Police Department issued an RFB on January 26, 2026 (due February 25, 2026) for on-call blood draw services by certified phlebotomy technicians. The geographic spread spans California, Florida, and New Mexico, but the recent activity does not reflect recurring procurement patterns under this code's stated clinical scope. Bidders evaluating this code should verify the actual commodity or service classification with issuing bodies before pursuing opportunities, as the tagged opportunities suggest either systematic miscoding or a significantly broader institutional definition of the code than its name suggests.